22.08.2015 Views

A Look at Amazon Basin Seasonal Dynamics with the Biophysical ...

A Look at Amazon Basin Seasonal Dynamics with the Biophysical ...

A Look at Amazon Basin Seasonal Dynamics with the Biophysical ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Tower- and Biometry-based Measurements of Tropical Forest Carbon BalanceScott D. Miller, Michael L. Goulden, Mary C. MentonDepartment of Earth System Science, University of California IrvineHumberto R. da Rocha, Helber C. Freitas, Adelaine Michela Silva e Figueira, CleilimAlbert Dias de SousaDepartment of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Sao PauloCorresponding author:Scott D. MillerDepartment of Earth System ScienceUniversity of CaliforniaIrvine, CA 92697-3100sdmiller@uci.eduVoice 949 824-2314Fax 949 824-3256We used two independent approaches, micrometeorology and biometry, todetermine <strong>the</strong> Net Ecosystem Production (NEP) of a primary forest in Para, Brazil. Eddycovariance measurements of CO 2 exchange were made during 93% of <strong>the</strong> time from July2000 to July 2001 using both open and closed-p<strong>at</strong>h gas analyzers. The annual sum (NEP)was calcul<strong>at</strong>ed using 12 different combin<strong>at</strong>ions of hardware and software to gauge <strong>the</strong>sensitivity to methodology. The annual sum calcul<strong>at</strong>ed using <strong>the</strong> closed-p<strong>at</strong>h gas analyzerand 30-minute averaging was –4.0 T C ha -1 yr -1 , consistent <strong>with</strong> tower measurements ino<strong>the</strong>r <strong>Amazon</strong>ian forests. We directly show th<strong>at</strong> this result is not significantly affected byhardware configur<strong>at</strong>ions and flux-calcul<strong>at</strong>ion methods. This tower-based result issignificantly different from three inventories of forest biomass <strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> site over a 16-yearperiod th<strong>at</strong> indic<strong>at</strong>e <strong>the</strong> forest has not been accumul<strong>at</strong>ing a large amount of carbon(0 ± 1.5 T C ha -1 yr -1 ). The tower-based measurements indic<strong>at</strong>ed nocturnal respir<strong>at</strong>ionwas underestim<strong>at</strong>ed during calm conditions. The annual sum changed by ~4 T C ha -1 yr -1 ,and became consistent <strong>with</strong> <strong>the</strong> biometric measurements, when <strong>the</strong> NEE during periods<strong>with</strong> u * < 0.2 ms -1 were replaced <strong>with</strong> observ<strong>at</strong>ions from more turbulent periods. Weconclude th<strong>at</strong> this u * filter provides <strong>the</strong> best estim<strong>at</strong>e of annual CO 2 exchange, resulting ina NEP of +0.1 T C ha -1 yr -1 , such th<strong>at</strong> <strong>the</strong> forest nei<strong>the</strong>r gained nor lost large amounts ofcarbon during <strong>the</strong> study interval. The high Gross Primary Production and calm nightscharacteristic of tropical forest amplify <strong>the</strong> uncertainty in tower-based annual sumscompared to temper<strong>at</strong>e and boreal forest sites, and hence we <strong>at</strong>tach a confidence intervalto <strong>the</strong> tower-based NEP of –5.2 and +1.2 T C ha -1 yr -1 .Key words: biosphere-<strong>at</strong>mosphere exchange, tropical forest, CO 2 exchange, NetEcosystem Production, eddy covariance, LBA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!