LEGIONELLA - World Health Organization
LEGIONELLA - World Health Organization LEGIONELLA - World Health Organization
It is often practical and highly effective to reduce the concentration of dissolved minerals, such as calcium and magnesium, in make-up water before it enters the cooling system (water softening). Water softening reduces the potential of the system to form biofilms, but may increase corrosion. Reduction of organic load in the source water by chlorination or filtration (or both in concert) helps to remove nutrients that could lead to legionellae proliferation. Chlorination used to reduce the organic load may also serve to disinfect the water of its inherent microbial load. Water treatment and water distribution — control measures A system should be designed in such a way that water circulates through all parts of the system that should be wetted whenever it is operational. Deadlegs on existing systems should be removed or shortened (so that their length is no longer than the diameter of the pipe), or should be modified to permit the circulation of chemically treated water. Dirt, organic matter and other debris should be kept to a minimum, as water treatment chemicals are generally more effective when the system is kept clean. After stagnation of part or all of the system, system operation should always be coordinated with full chemical treatment of the water. Similarly, when a cooling tower system has been shut down for more than three days, the entire system (i.e. cooling tower, system piping, heat exchangers, etc.) should be drained to waste, if practicable. Since it is often not possible to completely eliminate all water from shut-down cooling systems, cooling water must be pretreated with an appropriate antimicrobial regimen before system start-up (HSC, 2000; Guideline 12– 2000 in ASHRAE, 2000); that is, before activating the fans. Corrosion inhibitors should be used to minimize corrosion of metal surfaces. Surfactants, biocides and other chemicals should be used to control fouling due to scale, silt and microbial growth. Use of these chemicals will help to maintain efficient heat transfer at metal surfaces, ensure free flow of water throughout the system and prevent the proliferation of microorganisms that are responsible for surface corrosion and degradation. Disinfection — control measures Because of the many factors that can compromise the disinfection process (outlined above), it is advisable to vary the antimicrobial stresses applied in the cooling water microbial control programme (McCoy, 1998), particularly in the case of non-oxidizing biocides. One practical and effective means to vary antimicrobial stresses is to alternate between two non-oxidizing biocides added as a single (“slug” or “shot”) dose, manually or automatically, at 3–4-day intervals. Another effective approach is to alternate use of an oxidizing antimicrobial with a nonoxidizing antimicrobial, to ensure that different modes of antimicrobial action are employed. When varying antimicrobial stresses, performance-based monitoring is used to assess the extent of microbial control achieved (McCoy, 2003). LEGIONELLA AND THE PREVENTION OF LEGIONELLOSIS
The section on control measures for cleaning and maintenance (below) contains additional information on the disinfection process. Oxidizing biocides Commonly used oxidizing antimicrobials for cooling water include chlorine, bromine, stabilized bromine, combinations of bromine and chlorine, chlorine dioxide, peroxy compounds such as hydrogen peroxide and peracetic acid, and ozone (Kim et al., 2002; McCoy, 2002).Oxidizing antimicrobials are often effective when fed continuously using metering systems with small pumps, and many towers are successfully treated with continuous dosing with chlorine or bromine. Shot-dosing of oxidants, which can also be very effective in microbial control, is an alternative to unvarying application of oxidizing antimicrobials. Non-oxidizing biocides Non-oxidizing biocides are most effective when shot dosed. The maintenance of a continuous residual of non-oxidizing biocides in the system will inevitably lead to the selection of resistant microorganisms and loss of microbial control (Russell, 2000; 2002). Non-oxidizing biocides are usually dosed at higher concentrations (15–50 parts per million [ppm]) than oxidizing biocides, and may require longer contact times at these concentrations (4–10 hours). Treatment programme All biocides should preferably be fed via a metering system, and the appropriate dose calculated on the basis of system volume and half-life (dilution rate) within the system (Kim et al., 2002). “Blow-down” or “bleed-off” is the removal of some of the water periodically or continually, and its replacement with fresh water, to control the continuous accumulation of dissolved solids in the water. This process may be controlled by a conductivity controller that detects the increase in conductivity due to the dissolved solids, and automatically regulates the rate to hold a preset conductivity by triggering the operation of a solenoid drain valve. Blow-down may be activated immediately before the addition of the biocide, to ensure that the amount of suspended dirt in the water that might react with and neutralize the biocide is minimized. Blow-down may then be stopped for a period after the addition of the biocide, to ensure that the chemical is retained at a sufficient concentration for long enough to be effective. In selecting a chemical treatment programme, the operating parameters and water chemistry that may be unique to the system should be considered. A microbial control problem is rarely resolved by the application of generic technologies. Any microbial control strategy will fail without due attention to other control measures. Usually, the advice and the practical guidance of a water treatment specialist are necessary. LEGIONELLA AND THE PREVENTION OF LEGIONELLOSIS
- Page 51 and 52: 1.5.4 Host defence The host defence
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 2 Ecology and environmental
- Page 55 and 56: L. pneumophila is thermotolerant an
- Page 57 and 58: 2.2.3 Environmental factors and vir
- Page 59 and 60: Figure 2.1 Biofilm formation Biofil
- Page 61 and 62: 2.4 Sources of Legionella infection
- Page 63 and 64: Chapter 3 Approaches to risk manage
- Page 65 and 66: Table . Cool ng tower outbreaks Fac
- Page 67 and 68: Even when a source reaches a state
- Page 69 and 70: The WSP should be prepared in conju
- Page 71 and 72: Identify control measures Control m
- Page 73 and 74: F gure . Dec mal reduct on t mes fo
- Page 75 and 76: Method Advantages D sadvantages Dos
- Page 77 and 78: Validate effectiveness of water saf
- Page 79 and 80: • clear statements of responsibil
- Page 81 and 82: Chapter 4 Potable water and in-buil
- Page 83 and 84: The remainder of this chapter provi
- Page 85 and 86: 4.3.1 Document and describe the sys
- Page 87 and 88: Construction materials — risk fac
- Page 89 and 90: Where temperature controls (discuss
- Page 91 and 92: 4.4.2 Monitor control measures This
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 5 Cooling towers and evapor
- Page 95 and 96: 5.1.1 Cross-flow cooling towers As
- Page 97 and 98: water treatments (including chemica
- Page 99 and 100: 5.3 System assessment This section
- Page 101: Spray drift — risk factors Even w
- Page 105 and 106: • periodic or continuous bleed-of
- Page 107 and 108: Box . Po nts to be noted when clean
- Page 109 and 110: In certain circumstances, samples m
- Page 111 and 112: Table . Example documentat on for m
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 6 Health-care facilities Ma
- Page 115 and 116: For 1999 and 2000, a total of 384 c
- Page 117 and 118: 6.3 System assessment This section
- Page 119 and 120: Table . Type of colon zat on of wat
- Page 121 and 122: 6.4.1 Identify control measures Thi
- Page 123 and 124: 6.5.1 Prepare management procedures
- Page 125 and 126: Until the situation is under contro
- Page 127 and 128: Chapter 7 Hotels and ships Roisin R
- Page 129 and 130: F gure . Detected and reported case
- Page 131 and 132: Table . Rev ew of outbreaks (more t
- Page 133 and 134: 7.2 Water safety plan overview WSPs
- Page 135 and 136: The risk of legionellosis is increa
- Page 137 and 138: Kingdom to 66% in Spain (Starlinger
- Page 139 and 140: Agency, Legionella Section, United
- Page 141 and 142: Given the complexity of distributio
- Page 143 and 144: Chapter 8 Natural spas, hot tubs an
- Page 145 and 146: Spas “Natural spa”, denotes fac
- Page 147 and 148: Rare cases of Legionnaires’ disea
- Page 149 and 150: Process step P pework Water n hot t
- Page 151 and 152: Hosepipes may sometimes be used to
It is often practical and highly effective to reduce the concentration of dissolved minerals, such<br />
as calcium and magnesium, in make-up water before it enters the cooling system (water softening).<br />
Water softening reduces the potential of the system to form biofilms, but may increase corrosion.<br />
Reduction of organic load in the source water by chlorination or filtration (or both in concert)<br />
helps to remove nutrients that could lead to legionellae proliferation. Chlorination used to<br />
reduce the organic load may also serve to disinfect the water of its inherent microbial load.<br />
Water treatment and water distribution — control measures<br />
A system should be designed in such a way that water circulates through all parts of the system<br />
that should be wetted whenever it is operational. Deadlegs on existing systems should be<br />
removed or shortened (so that their length is no longer than the diameter of the pipe), or<br />
should be modified to permit the circulation of chemically treated water.<br />
Dirt, organic matter and other debris should be kept to a minimum, as water treatment chemicals<br />
are generally more effective when the system is kept clean.<br />
After stagnation of part or all of the system, system operation should always be coordinated with<br />
full chemical treatment of the water. Similarly, when a cooling tower system has been shut down<br />
for more than three days, the entire system (i.e. cooling tower, system piping, heat exchangers,<br />
etc.) should be drained to waste, if practicable. Since it is often not possible to completely<br />
eliminate all water from shut-down cooling systems, cooling water must be pretreated with<br />
an appropriate antimicrobial regimen before system start-up (HSC, 2000; Guideline 12–<br />
2000 in ASHRAE, 2000); that is, before activating the fans.<br />
Corrosion inhibitors should be used to minimize corrosion of metal surfaces. Surfactants,<br />
biocides and other chemicals should be used to control fouling due to scale, silt and microbial<br />
growth. Use of these chemicals will help to maintain efficient heat transfer at metal surfaces,<br />
ensure free flow of water throughout the system and prevent the proliferation of microorganisms<br />
that are responsible for surface corrosion and degradation.<br />
Disinfection — control measures<br />
Because of the many factors that can compromise the disinfection process (outlined above),<br />
it is advisable to vary the antimicrobial stresses applied in the cooling water microbial control<br />
programme (McCoy, 1998), particularly in the case of non-oxidizing biocides. One practical<br />
and effective means to vary antimicrobial stresses is to alternate between two non-oxidizing<br />
biocides added as a single (“slug” or “shot”) dose, manually or automatically, at 3–4-day intervals.<br />
Another effective approach is to alternate use of an oxidizing antimicrobial with a nonoxidizing<br />
antimicrobial, to ensure that different modes of antimicrobial action are employed.<br />
When varying antimicrobial stresses, performance-based monitoring is used to assess the<br />
extent of microbial control achieved (McCoy, 2003).<br />
<strong>LEGIONELLA</strong> AND THE PREVENTION OF LEGIONELLOSIS