- Page 1 and 2: Innovative Technology and Sustainab
- Page 3 and 4: Innovative Technology and Sustainab
- Page 5 and 6: Abstract Development of organic dai
- Page 7: Contents 1 General introduction 9 2
- Page 11 and 12: kg ECM 7900 7700 7500 7300 7100 690
- Page 13 and 14: validation, using an iterative proc
- Page 15 and 16: EES issues was based on a comprehen
- Page 17 and 18: Oudshoorn F.W., De Boer, I.J.M., Va
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 2 Systems in Organic Dairy
- Page 21 and 22: 2.1 Introduction Organic dairy prod
- Page 23 and 24: premium price for organic milk. The
- Page 25 and 26: countries, leading to four focus gr
- Page 27 and 28: image. The third area (questions 4,
- Page 29 and 30: with AMS use, but these problems we
- Page 31 and 32: would decrease the sales of the pro
- Page 33 and 34: Dutch want to save time (economic i
- Page 35 and 36: consumers. Consumers’ image was c
- Page 37 and 38: Academic Publishers Halkier, Bente.
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 3 Quantification of Sustain
- Page 41 and 42: 3.1. Introduction Organic dairy far
- Page 43 and 44: Indicators were expressed per dairy
- Page 45 and 46: 3.2.9 Milk Quality Aspects Indicato
- Page 47 and 48: level for AMS compared to CMS farms
- Page 49 and 50: Table 3. Mean results of environmen
- Page 51 and 52: Table 5. Mean milk quality indicato
- Page 53 and 54: 535) in 2005 was 0.64 (DCF, 2005).
- Page 55 and 56: shorter grazing time did not result
- Page 57 and 58: livestock farming. Livest. Prod. Sc
- Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 4 Dairy Cow Defecation and
- Page 61 and 62:
4.1 Introduction Pasturing high-yie
- Page 63 and 64:
4.2.4 GPS logging of defecation and
- Page 65 and 66:
Table 1. Frequency of urination and
- Page 67 and 68:
Treatment P9, 9 hours of grazing fr
- Page 69 and 70:
Table 4. Velocity and distance walk
- Page 71 and 72:
Table 6. Nitrogen (N) balance at co
- Page 73 and 74:
Velocity in m/sec in the 6.5 hour g
- Page 75 and 76:
elatively high CP) outdoors also ha
- Page 77 and 78:
References Anonymous, 2006. Stateme
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 5 Economic and Environmenta
- Page 81 and 82:
5. 1 Introduction In 2006, organic
- Page 83 and 84:
evaluation of consequences. This in
- Page 85 and 86:
1. The first scenario implies conti
- Page 87 and 88:
5.2.4 Parameterization of productio
- Page 89 and 90:
N excretion per MPU = ( SFU per MPU
- Page 91 and 92:
Minutes per cow per day 10.00 9.00
- Page 93 and 94:
Veterinary costs expressed per cow
- Page 95 and 96:
5.3 Results 5.3.1 Farm characteriza
- Page 97 and 98:
Table 7. Cost-benefit analysis of t
- Page 99 and 100:
Total emission of GHG was highest i
- Page 101 and 102:
Eutrophication, however, implies di
- Page 103 and 104:
in BAU also contains a risk, as sma
- Page 105 and 106:
Domeij, Å. 2007. Agriculture and m
- Page 107 and 108:
Agriculture and Horticulture, 2007
- Page 109 and 110:
Chapter 6 General Discussion Thesis
- Page 111 and 112:
and public acceptance were investig
- Page 113 and 114:
(Table 2.) This was confirmed by an
- Page 115 and 116:
percentage of farms confirming 70 6
- Page 117 and 118:
Table 3. Distribution of herd size
- Page 119 and 120:
The grazing practice is a result of
- Page 121 and 122:
adoption lifecycle (Fig 4), and in
- Page 123 and 124:
6.5 References Adriaansen-Tennekes,
- Page 125 and 126:
economics in automatic milking syst
- Page 127 and 128:
To answer what economic, ecological
- Page 129 and 130:
y almost using all their time outsi
- Page 131 and 132:
d. Wat zijn de economische en ecolo
- Page 133 and 134:
� Een systematische kwantificerin
- Page 135 and 136:
For at kunne besvare hvilke økonom
- Page 137 and 138:
edriftens mælk var det frie fedtsy
- Page 139 and 140:
List of scientific publications Int
- Page 141:
Curriculum vitae Frank Willem Oudsh