20.08.2015 Views

process

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

80 H. Emerson and R. MeyerconditionZhNc.;x/;˛i WDGc.g/˛.g 1 x/dgfor ˛ 2 C 0 .X/ defines a probability measure on X. Since such measures are containedin P .X/, Nc defines a map Nc W EG X ! P .X/. This map is continuous and satisfiesNc.g;g 1 xh/ DNc.;x/h for all g 2 G, 2 EG, x 2 X, h 2 H .ForaC -algebra Z, let C.EG;Z/ be the -C -algebra of all continuous functionsf W EG ! Z without any growth restriction. Thus C.EG;Z/ D lim C.K;Z/,where K runs through the directed set of compact subsets of EG.We claim that . Nc f /./.x/ WD f Nc.;x/ for f 2 C 0 .P .X/; D/ defines a continuous-homomorphismNc W C 0 .P .X/; D/ ! C EG;C 0 .X; D/ :If K EG is compact, then there is a compact subset L G such that c. g/ D 0for 2 K and g … L. Hence Nc.;x/ is supported in L 1 x for 2 K. Since G actson X by translations, such measures are contained in a filtration level P d .X/. HenceNc .f / restricts to a C 0 -function K X ! D for all f 2 C 0 .P .X/; D/. This provesthe claim. Since Nc is H -equivariant and G-invariant, we get an induced mapB P .X/ D C 0 .P .X/; D/ Ì H ! .C EG;C 0 .X; D/ Ì H/ G D C.EG;B X / G ;where Z G Z denotes the subalgebra of G-invariant elements. We obtain an induced-homomorphism between the stable multiplier algebras as well.An element of K 0 B P .X/ / is represented by a self-adjoint bounded multiplier F 2M.B P .X/ ˝ K/ such that 1 FF and 1 F F belong to B P .X/ ˝ K. NowFQWDNc .F / is a G-invariant bounded multiplier of C.EG;B X ˝ K/ and hence a G-invariantmultiplier of C 0 .EG;B X ˝ K/, such that ˛ .1 FQFQ / and ˛ .1 FQ F/ Q belongto C 0 .EG;B X ˝ K/ for all ˛ 2 C 0 .EG/. This says exactly that FQis a cycle forRKK G 0 .EGI C;B X/. This construction provides the natural map W K 0 .B P .X/ / ! RKK G 0 .EGI C;B X/:Finally, a routine computation, which we omit, shows that the two images of a unitaryu 2 E X =B X differ by a compact perturbation. Hence the diagram (13) commutes.We are mainly interested in the case where A is the source P of a Dirac morphismfor H . Then K C1 .E X =B X / D Ktop H; c redH.X; D/ , and the top row in (13) is theH -equivariant coarse co-assembly map for X with coefficients D. Since we assume Hto act properly on X,wehaveaKK G -equivalence B X C 0 .X; D/ Ì H , and similarlyfor P .X/. Hence we now get a commuting squareK topC1H; credH .X; D/ @KK G .C;C 0.X; D/ Ì H/p EGKX H.X; D/ RKKG .EGI C;C 0 .X; D/ Ì H/.(14)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!