20.08.2015 Views

process

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Axioms for the norm residue isomorphism 429Theorems 3.8 and 4.4 of [8] upon Lemmas 2.2 and 2.3 of [8], whose proofs are currentlyunavailable. Instead, [8, 5.11] proves that the canonical map X ! X factors throughthe map y W M ! X. Since this paper was written, the gap in the proof was patchedin [12].In Rost’s approach, defines an equivalence class of idempotent endomorphismse of X and Rost defines M to be the Chow motive .X; e/. By construction, his Msatisfies Axioms 0.3 (a)–(b). Hopefully it also satisfies Axiom 0.3 (c), the existence oftriangles (0.4) and (0.5).Notation. The integer n and the prime `>2will be fixed. We will work over a fixedfield k in which ` is invertible. The integer d will always be `n 1 1 and b will alwaysbe d=.` 1/ D 1 CC`n 2 .We fix the sequence of units a D .a 1 ;:::;a n /, and X will always denote ad-dimensional Rost variety relative to a, satisfying Axioms 0.3.We will work in the triangulated category of motives DM eff described in [2]. TheLefschetz motive is L D Z.1/Œ2. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, motivic cohomologywill always be taken with coefficients Z .`/ . The notation H p;qét. / refers tothe étale motivic cohomology H p ét . ; Z .`/.q// defined in [2, 10.1].Finally, I would like to thank the Institute for Advanced Study for allowing me topresent these results in a seminar during the Fall of 2006, and Pierre Deligne for hiscontinued interest and encouragement.1 Proof of Theorem 0.1Recall [6, 1.20] that a n 1 -variety over a field k is a smooth projective variety Xof dimension d D `n 1 1, with deg s d .X/ 6 0.mod `2/. Here s d .X/ is thePcharacteristic class of the tangent bundle T X corresponding to the symmetric polynomialtdjin the Chern roots t j of T X ; see [9, 14.3]. We also recall that H 1; 1 .Y / is thegroup Hom.Z; Y.1/Œ1/, and is covariant in Y ; see [2, 14.17].Definition 1.1. A Rost variety for a sequence a D .a 1 ;:::;a n / of units in k is a n 1 -variety such that: fa 1 ;:::;a n g vanishes in Kn M .k.X//=`; for each i < n there is a i -variety mapping to X; and the motivic homology sequenceH 1; 1 .X 2 / 0 1! H 1; 1 .X/ ! H 1; 1 .k/ .D k / (1.2)is exact. As mentioned in the Introduction, Rost varieties exist for every a by [1], [6].Example 1.2.1. If n D 1 and L D k. `pa1 /, then Spec.L/ is a Rost variety for a 1 ,with the convention that s 0 .X/ D ŒL W k D `. When n D 2, the Severi–Brauer varietycorresponding to the degree ` algebra with symbol a is a Rost variety.Proof of Theorem 0.1. By [10, 6.10], it suffices to prove the assertionH 90.n; `/:H nC1;nét.k/ D 0:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!