20.08.2015 Views

process

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Torsion classes of finite type and spectra 399D.I / is quasi-compact in Spec R by [2, Chapter 1, Ex. 17 (vii)]. We see that D.I / DSi2 0D.I i / for some finite subset 0 .Assume E 2 D fg .I / n S i2 0D fg .I i /. It follows from Theorem 3.5 that E P.E/ 2D fg .I /n S i2 0D fg .I i /. But E P.E/ 2 D fg .I /\Spec R D D.I / D S i2 0D.I i /, andhence it is in D.I i0 / D D fg .I i0 /\Spec R for some i 0 2 0 , a contradiction. So D fg .I /is quasi-compact. It also follows that the intersection D fg .I / \ D fg .J / D D fg .IJ / oftwo quasi-compact open subsets is quasi-compact. Furthermore, every quasi-compactopen subset in Inj fg R must therefore have the form D fg .I / with I finitely generated.Finally, it follows from Remark 3.4 and Theorem 3.5 that a subset V of Inj fg R isZariski-closed and irreducible if and only if there is a prime ideal Q of R such thatV DfE j P.E/ Qg. This obviously implies that the point E Q 2 V is generic.Notice that Inj fg R is not a spectral space in general, for it is not necessarily T 0 .Lemma 3.7. Let the ring R be commutative. Then the mapsandSpec R V7! Q V DfE 2 Inj R j P.E/ 2 V g.Inj fg R/ Q 7! V Q DfP.E/ 2 Spec R j E 2 Qg DQ \ Spec Rinduce a 1-1 correspondence between the lattices of open sets of Spec R and those of.Inj fg R/ .Proof. First note that E P 2 Q V for any P 2 V (see [14, 9.2]). Let us check thatQ V is an open set in .Inj fg R/ . Every closed subset of Spec R with quasi-compactcomplement has the form V.I/ for some finitely generated ideal, I ,ofR (see [2,Chapter 1, Exercise 17 (vii)]), so there are finitely generated ideals I R such thatV D S V.I /. Since the points E and E P.E/ are, by Theorem 3.5, indistinguishablein .Inj fg R/ we see that Q V D S V fg .I /, hence this set is open in .Inj fg R/ .The same arguments imply that V Q is open in Spec R. It is now easy to see thatV QV D V and Q VQ D Q.4 Torsion classes and thick subcategoriesWe shall write L.Spec R/, L..Inj fg R/ /, L thick .D per .R//, L tor .Mod R/ to denote:• the lattice of all open subsets of Spec R,• the lattice of all open subsets of .Inj fg R/ ,• the lattice of all thick subcategories of D per .R/,• the lattice of all torsion classes of finite type in Mod R, ordered by inclusion.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!