20.08.2015 Views

process

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Deformations of gerbes on smooth manifolds 389Proposition 7.19. The following diagram commutes:G DR .J/ ! .U/ .N/ G DR .J/ ! .V/ˆ;r;FG DR .J.A// .N/ G DR .J.A //.ˆ.N/ ;.N/ r; .N/ F(7.20)8 Proof of the main theoremIn this section we prove the main result of this paper. Recall the statement of thetheorem from the introduction:Theorem 1. Suppose that X is a C 1 manifold and S is an algebroid stack on X whichis a twisted form of O X . Then, there is an equivalence of 2-groupoid valued functorsof commutative Artin C-algebrasDef X .S/ Š MC 2 .g DR .J X / ŒS /:Proof. Suppose U isacoverofX such that 0 S.N 0U/ is nonempty. There is adescent datum .U; A/ 2 Desc C .U/ whose image under the functor Desc C .U/ !AlgStack C .X/ is equivalent to S.The proof proceeds as follows.Recall the 2-groupoids Def 0 .U; A/.R/ and Def.U; A/.R/ of deformations of andstar-products on the descent datum .U; A/ defined in Section 6.2. Note that the compositionDesc R .U/ ! Triv R .X/ ! AlgStack R .X/ induces functors Def 0 .U; A/.R/ !Def.S/.R/ and Def.U; A/.R/ ! Def.S/.R/, the second one being the compositionof the first one with the equivalence Def.U; A/.R/ ! Def 0 .U; A/.R/. We are goingto show that for a commutative Artin C-algebra R there are equivalences1. Def.U; A/.R/ Š MC 2 .g DR .J X / ŒS /.R/ and2. the functor Def.U; A/.R/ Š Def.S/.R/ induced by the functor Def.U; A/.R/ !Def.S/.R/ above.Let J.A/ D .J.A 01 /; j 1 .A 012 //. Then, .U; J.A// is a descent datum for atwisted form of J X . Let R be a commutative Artin C-algebra with maximal ideal m R .Then the first statement follows from the equivalencesDef.U; A/.R/ Š Stack.G.A/ ˝ m R / (8.1)Š Stack.G DR .J.A/// ˝ m R / (8.2)Š Stack.G DR .J X / ŒS ˝ m R / (8.3)Š MC 2 .g DR .J X / ŒS ˝ m R /: (8.4)Here the equivalence (8.1) is the subject of Proposition 6.4. The inclusion of horizontalsections is a quasi-isomorphism and the induced map in (8.2) is an equivalenceby Theorem 3.6. In Theorem 7.18 we have constructed a quasi-isomorphism

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!