20.08.2015 Views

process

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

350 P. Bressler, A. Gorokhovsky, R. Nest, and B. TsyganThe DGLA g.J X / ŒS is defined as the ŒS-twist of the DGLAg DR .J X / WD .XI DR. xC .J X //Œ1/:Here, J X is the sheaf of infinite jets of functions on X, considered as a sheaf of topologicalO X -algebras with the canonical flat connection r can . The shifted normalizedHochschild complex xC .J X /Œ1 is understood to comprise locally defined O X -linearcontinuous Hochschild cochains. It is a sheaf of DGLA under the Gerstenhaber bracketand the Hochschild differential ı. The canonical flat connection on J X induces one, alsodenoted r can ,on xC .J X //Œ1. The flat connection r can commutes with the differentialı and acts by derivations of the Gerstenhaber bracket. Therefore, the de Rham complexDR. xC .J X //Œ1/ WD X ˝ xC .J X //Œ1/ equipped with the differential r can C ı andthe Lie bracket induced by the Gerstenhaber bracket is a sheaf of DGLA on X givingrise to the DGLA g.J X / of global sections.The sheaf of abelian Lie algebras J X =O X acts by derivations of degree 1 on thegraded Lie algebra xC .J X /Œ1 via the adjoint action. Moreover, this action commuteswith the Hochschild differential. Therefore, the (abelian) graded Lie algebra X ˝J X =O X acts by derivations on the graded Lie algebra X ˝ xC .J X //Œ1. We denotethe action of the form ! 2 X ˝ J X=O X by ! . Consider now the subsheaf of closedforms . X ˝J X=O X / cl which is by definition the kernel of r can . .X k ˝J X=O X / cl actsby derivations of degree k 1 and this action commutes with the differential r can C ı.Therefore, for ! 2 .XI . 2 ˝ J X =O X / cl / one can define the !-twist g.J X / ! asthe DGLA with the same underlying graded Lie algebra structure as g.J X / and thedifferential given by r can Cı C ! . The isomorphism class of this DGLA depends onlyon the cohomology class of ! in H 2 ..XI X ˝ J X=O X /; r can /.More precisely, for ˇ 2 .XI X 1 ˝ J X=O X / the DGLA g DR .J X / ! andg DR .J X / !Cr canˇ are canonically isomorphic with the isomorphism depending onlyon the equivalence class ˇ C Im.r can /.As we remarked before a twisted form S of O X is determined up to equivalence by itsclass in H 2 .XI O /. The composition O ! O =C log ! O=C j 1 ! DR.J=O/ inducesthe map H 2 .XI O / ! H 2 .XI DR.J=O// Š H 2 ..XI X ˝J X=O X /; r can /.We denote by ŒS 2 H 2 ..XI X ˝ J X=O X /; r can / the image of the class of S. Bythe remarks above we have the well-defined up to a canonical isomorphism DGLAg DR .J X / ŒS .The rest of this paper is organized as follows. In Section 2 we review some preliminaryfacts. In Section 3 we review the construction of Deligne 2-groupoid, its relationwith the deformation theory and its cosimplicial analogues. In Section 4 we review thenotion of algebroid stacks. Next we define matrix algebras associated with a descentdatum in Section 5. In Section 6 we define the deformations of algebroid stacks andrelate them to the cosimplicial DGLA of Hochschild cochains on matrix algebras. InSection 7 we establish quasiisomorphism of the DGLA controlling the deformationsof twisted forms of O X with a simpler cosimplicial DGLA. Finally, the proof the mainresult of this paper, Theorem 1, is given in Section 8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!