20.08.2015 Views

process

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

264 U. Bunke, T. Schick, M. Spitzweck, and A. Thomassertion. We getdt DDvXd. k .Qt rk / jU W / Dj D1vX k .d Qt rk / jU W Dj D1D s jU W :vX k d.Qt rk / jU Wj D1vX k s jU WCorollary 3.28. 1. If G is discrete, then we have Ext i Sh Ab S .Z.Rn /; G/ Š 0 for alli 1.2. For every compact W 2 S and n 1 we have Ext i Sh Ab S .Z.W /; Rn / Š 0 for alli 1.Lemma 3.29. If W is a profinite space, then every sheaf F 2 Sh Ab S is R W -acyclic.Consequently, Ext i Sh Ab S .Z.W /; F / Š 0 for i 1.Proof. We first show the following intermediate result which is used in 3.4.3 in orderto finish the proof of Lemma 3.29.Lemma 3.30. If W is a profinite space, then .W I :::/is exact.Proof. A profinite topological space can be written as limit, W Š lim I W n , for an inversesystem of finite spaces .W n / n2I . Let p n W W ! W n denote the projections. First of all,W is compact. Every covering of W admits a finite subcovering. Furthermore, a finitecovering admits a refinement to a covering by pairwise disjoint open subsets of the form¹p 1n.x/º x2W nfor an appropriate n 2 I . This implies the vanishing HLp .W; F / Š 0of the Čech cohomology groups for p 1 and every presheaf F 2 Pr Ab S.Let H q D R q i be the derived functor of the embedding i W Sh Ab S ! Pr Ab S ofsheaves into presheaves. We now consider the Čech cohomology spectral sequence[Tam94, 3.4.4] .E r ;d r / ) R .W;F/ with E p;q2Š HLp .W I H q .F // and use[Tam94, 3.4.3] to the effect that HL0 .W I H q .F // Š 0 for all q 1. Combiningthese two vanishing results we see that the only non-trivial term of the second page ofthe spectral sequence is E 0;02Š HL0 .W I H 0 .F // Š F.W/. Vanishing of R i .W I :::/for i 1 is equivalent to the exactness of .W I :::/.3.4.3 We now prove Lemma 3.29. Let i 1. We use that R i R W .F / is the sheafificationof the presheaf S 3 A 7! R i .A W I F/ 2 Ab. For every sheaf F 2 Sh Ab Swe have by some intermediate steps in (16)j D1.A W I F/Š .W I R A .F //:Let us choose an injective resolution F ! I . Using Lemma 3.30 for the secondisomorphism we getH i .AI R W .I // s7!QsŠ H i .A W I I / Qs7!NsŠ .W I H i R A .I //: (18)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!