20.08.2015 Views

process

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

12 R. Meyerextensions, and cp-split extensions, respectively. Similar remarks apply to mappingcylinders and mapping cones: for any morphism of extensionsI E Qwe get extensions˛ I 0 E0 Q 0 ,ˇCyl.˛/ Cyl.ˇ/ Cyl./; Cone.˛/ Cone.ˇ/ Cone./I (6)if the extensions in (5) are split or cp-split, so are the resulting extensions in (6).The familiar maps relating mapping cones and cylinders to cones and suspensionscontinue to exist in our case. For any morphism f W A ! B in G-C alg, we get amorphism of extensionsSus.B/ Cone.f / ACone.B/ Cyl.f / A.The bottom extension splits and the maps A $ Cyl.f / are inverse to each other upto homotopy. By naturality, the composite map Cone.f / ! A ! B factors throughCone.id B / Š Cone.B/ and hence is homotopic to the zero map.3 Universal functors with certain propertiesWhen we study topological invariants for C -algebras, we usually require homotopyinvariance and some exactness and stability conditions. Here we investigate theseconditions and their interplay and describe some universal functors.We discuss homotopy invariant functors on G-C alg and the homotopy categoryHo.G-C alg/ in §3.1. This is parallel to classical topology. We turn to Morita–Rieffel invariance and C -stability in §3.2–3.3. We describe the resulting localisationusing correspondences. By the way, in a C -algebra context, stability usually refers toalgebras of compact operators instead of suspensions. §3.4 deals with various exactnessconditions: split-exactness, half-exactness, and additivity.Whereas each of the above properties in itself seems rather weak, their combinationmay have striking consequences. For instance, a functor that is both C -stable andsplit-exact is automatically homotopy invariant and satisfies Bott periodicity.Throughout this section, we consider functors S ! C where S is a full subcategoryof C alg or G-C alg for some locally compact group G. The target category Cmay be arbitrary in §3.1–§3.3; to discuss exactness properties, we require C to bean exact category or at least additive. Typical choices for S are the categories ofseparable or separable nuclear C -algebras, or the subcategory of all separable nuclearG-C -algebras with an amenable (or a proper) action of G.(5)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!