20.08.2015 Views

process

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

236 U. Bunke, T. Schick, M. Spitzweck, and A. Thom1.5.9 We have canonical isomorphisms H 0 .D.U // Š D.H 1 .U // Š D.T jB / ŠZ jB and let D.U / 1 D.U / be the pre-image of ¹1º jB Z jB under the natural mapD.U / ! H 0 .D.U //. The quotient D.U / 1 =.BT/ jB is a Z n -gerbe over B which weinterpret as the gerbe of R n -reductions of a T n -principal bundle yE ! B which iswell-defined up to unique isomorphism. The full structure of D.U / supplies the dualgerbe yG ! yE. The details of this construction are explained in 6.4.1.5.10 In this way we use Pontrjagin duality of Picard stacks in order to construct aT -dual pair to .E; G/. Schematically the picture is.E; G/ 1 Ý U2 Ý D.U / 3 Ý . yE; yG/;where the steps are as follows:1. choice of the structure on G of a torsor over .BT T n / jB2. Pontrjagin duality D.U / WD Hom PIC S .U; BT/3. Extraction of the dual pair from D.U / as explained in 1.5.9.1.5.11 Consider a pair .E; G/. In Subsection 6.4 we provide two constructions:1. The construction ˆ starts with the choice of a T -duality triple extending .E; G/and constructs the structure of a torsor over .BT T n / jB on G.2. The construction ‰ starts with the structure on G of a torsor over .BT T n / jBand constructs an extension of .E; G/ to a T -duality triple.Our main result Theorem 6.23 asserts that the constructions ‰ and ˆ are inverses toeach other. In other words, the theories of topological T -duality via Pontrjagin dualityof Picard stacks and via T -duality triples are equivalent.2 Sheaves of Picard categories2.1 Picard categories2.1.1 In a cartesian closed category one can define the notion of a group object in thestandard way. It is given by an object, a multiplication, an identity, and an inversionmorphism. The group axioms can be written as a collection of commutative diagramsinvolving these morphisms.Stacks on a site S form a two-cartesian closed two-category. A group object in atwo-cartesian closed two-category is again given by an object and the multiplication,identity and inversion morphisms. In addition each of the commutative diagrams fromthe category case is now filled by a two-morphisms. These two-morphisms must satisfyhigher associativity relations.Instead of writing out all these relations we will follow the exposition of DeligneSGA4, exposé XVIII [Del], which gives a rather effective way of working with group

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!