20.08.2015 Views

process

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

K-theory and Noncommutative Geometry.pdf

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

222 W. WernerTheorem 3.5. On the Hilbert C*-manifold U there exists exactly one invariant connectionwhose Christoffel symbol at a is given by a .x; y/ D y.1 a a/ 1=2 a .1 aa / 1=2 xC x.1 a a/ 1=2 a .1 aa / 1=2 y D 2fx;Ma 0 .0/a; ygs a ;where fx;y;zg sproduct on E.D 1 .fz;y;xg Cfx;y;zg/ denotes the (symmetric) Jordan triple23.6. The reader should observe that the form f; ; g defined above is parallel for theinvariant connection, i.e. for all vector fields X; Y; Z and W we haver W fX; Y; Zg Dfr W XYZgCfXr W YZgCfXYr W Zg:This follows either from direct calculation (using the Jacobi identity for f; ; g), orfrom the fact that the covariant derivative of f; ; g is invariant under reflections. Thiscondition shows that r behaves like the Levi-Civitá connection with respect to theHilbert C*-structure on M . Under what conditions such a connection exists undermore general circumstances, is investigated in [10].4 Causality4.1. It is customary in a number of physical theories to pass from a Lorentzian to aRiemannian manifold (‘Wick Rotation’). This is due to the difficulties one is facedwith in a truly Lorentzian situation and which disappear in the Riemannian set-up. Onepeculiarity of Lorentzian manifolds can still be modeled in the Riemannian situation:Light cones in the fibers of the tangent bundle which specify those pairs of points on Mthat may interact with each other and are thus intimately connected to the notion ofcausality.Definition 4.2. A cone field on a manifold M is, for each m 2 M , an assignment of acone C m T m .M /.Here a cone is always supposed to be pointed but not necessarily to be generating.4.3. Our interest here is with cone fields that are invariant under the action of a group G,i.e. that C gm D d m g.C m / for all m 2 M and g 2 G. In our case, G will be a certainsubgroup of Aut U . Though it might be tempting to see invariance under Hol U (ora large subgroup) as a substitute for diffeomorphism invariance in the complex case,the main motivation here comes from the property that the connection defined in theprevious section has the property that for an invariant cone field .C m / parallel transportalong a curve from .a/to .b/ends in C .b/ if it began in C .a/ . This is well knownin the finite dimensional situation (see [7], [8]) and, in this regard, not much is changingin passing to infinite dimensions.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!