19.08.2015 Views

guidelines for korean informed consent - The Dentists Insurance ...

guidelines for korean informed consent - The Dentists Insurance ...

guidelines for korean informed consent - The Dentists Insurance ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

GUIDELINES FOR KOREAN INFORMED CONSENTTDIC designed these <strong>for</strong>ms to facilitate your “In<strong>for</strong>med Consent” discussions with your Korean-speaking patients.While the <strong>for</strong>ms are excellent educational tools and assist patients with making an in<strong>for</strong>med decision, if you do notspeak and understand Korean a person who can translate the patients’ questions and the dentist’s answers is requiredin order to fulfill the in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> duty.History of in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong><strong>The</strong> modern doctrine of in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> is based on the assumption that the patient must bear the expense,pain and suffering of any injury resulting from medical treatment and, there<strong>for</strong>e, has the right to know allmaterial facts about the proposed treatment.<strong>The</strong> American doctrine of in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> grew out of the concept of battery, which is defined as unpermittedphysical contact. Early in this century several court cases established the duty of health care providers to obtainthe patient’s <strong>consent</strong> prior to treatment. Consent became in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> in the 1950s and ’60s when severalcourts specified the types of in<strong>for</strong>mation that health care practitioners must disclose to patients in the course ofobtaining in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong>.In 1972, the Cali<strong>for</strong>nia Supreme Court in the case of Cobbs v Grant established a four-part test thatdefines the duty to obtain in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> today. Cali<strong>for</strong>nia dentists specifically must disclose (1) therisk of death, (2) the risk of serious bodily injury, (3) all facts deemed material to a decision to <strong>consent</strong>and (4) all facts disclosed by other practitioners under similar circumstances. Material in<strong>for</strong>mation isthat which the dentist knows or should know a reasonable person in the patient’s position wouldregard as significant to making a decision. A material fact is one not commonly appreciated by laypersons.<strong>The</strong> duty to discloseAlthough in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> specifically involves the education of the patient, it also represents the culminationof the process of developing a diagnosis and treatment plan. Only by having a solid diagnosis and realistic plan<strong>for</strong> treatment can the dentist reliably in<strong>for</strong>m the patient about the nature of the proposed treatment, the benefitsand alternatives, risks and potential consequences of not per<strong>for</strong>ming treatment. <strong>The</strong> process of in<strong>for</strong>ming thepatient can be seen as a model <strong>for</strong> the dentist-patient relationship, one in which the dentist shares his or herknowledge, findings and recommendations as part of a cooperative ef<strong>for</strong>t to help the patient achieve a healthyoral condition.<strong>The</strong> dentist must assist the patient in making an in<strong>for</strong>med decision about proceeding with the proposedtreatment or procedure by explaining:• the nature of the proposed treatment or procedure, including the cost and expected time <strong>for</strong> recuperationor healing.• the benefits of the proposed treatment or procedure.• the most common and severe risks associated with the proposed treatment or procedure, including theeffect of the individual patient’s specific condition or needs as well as the possible need <strong>for</strong> furthertreatment, including the possibility of death if applicable, i.e., reaction to anesthesia.• any reasonable alternatives to the proposed treatment or procedure, including the benefits and risks ofeach, and the risks and consequences of doing nothing.Page 1 of 3


In<strong>for</strong>med refusalIf the patient refuses the proposed treatment or procedure, the dentist must in<strong>for</strong>m the patient about the likelyconsequences and obtain the patient’s in<strong>for</strong>med refusal.Merely obtaining a patient’s in<strong>for</strong>med refusal does not relieve the dentist from practicing within the standard ofcare. Even if the dentist fully discloses the potential consequences of refusal and the discussion has beendocumented properly, a patient may not <strong>consent</strong> to substandard care nor may the dentist ethically or legallyagree to provide it. Particularly in the case of refused x-rays, the patient’s decision may effectively prevent thedentist from providing further treatment. This fact should be addressed during the in<strong>for</strong>med refusal discussion.Exceptions to disclosure<strong>The</strong> dentist has no duty to disclose where:• the patient asks not to be advised.• the procedure is simple and any danger is remote and commonly understood to be remote. For example,the risk of death by anaphylactic reaction following an injection is a remote risk of treatment• the risk is minor and seldom results in serious side effects. For example, gingival discom<strong>for</strong>t while bitingdown on bitewing x-ray films is a minor risk of treatment.• disclosure would so seriously upset the patient that he or she would be unable to rationally weigh the risksof refusing the procedure (known as the therapeutic exception).In addition to these exceptions, in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> is not required in very rare instances where the need torespond immediately to an unanticipated condition or a life-threatening emergency makes it impossible to obtainthe patient’s in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong>. However, since dental emergencies, unlike medical emergencies, are rarely lifethreatening,the dentist should make every reasonable ef<strong>for</strong>t to obtain the patient’s in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> or refusal.<strong>The</strong> in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> discussion<strong>The</strong> dentist should obtain the patient’s in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> through a face-to-face discussion that allows thepatient sufficient time to make an in<strong>for</strong>med decision. If the dentist does not speak the same language as thepatient, in this case Korean, a person who can translate the patient’s questions and the dentist’s answers isneeded in addition to the written in<strong>for</strong>mation translated into the patient’s language.Ideally, the in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> discussion should take place at least several days be<strong>for</strong>e treatment, such as whenthe dentist presents the treatment plan (this is particularly important <strong>for</strong> extensive, complex or risky treatment).Since the dentist is legally obligated to disclose in<strong>for</strong>mation in a manner the patient can understand, thediscussion should involve lay terminology, not scientific jargon. For the same reason, consider providingtranslated in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> materials and, if necessary, an interpreter <strong>for</strong> non-English-speaking patients whomay require it. <strong>The</strong> dentist must decide what to tell the patient about a procedure based on whether the patienthas undergone the same or similar procedure previously. <strong>The</strong> use of educational materials is recommended.Because the dentist bears the ultimate legal and ethical responsibility <strong>for</strong> in<strong>for</strong>ming the patient, the in<strong>for</strong>med<strong>consent</strong> discussion cannot be delegated to staff. Although staff can assist by presenting the patient with printedor audiovisual materials, the dentist should personally solicit and address the patient’s questions and concerns.In<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> <strong>for</strong> minor patientsFor minor patients, obtain the in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> of the parent, custodial parent or legal guardian. Where parentslive separately, the patient’s personal in<strong>for</strong>mation <strong>for</strong>m should indicate which parent is the custodial parent.Where separated parents share custody, the patient’s record should contain letters from each providing <strong>consent</strong>and authorization to treat. Asking <strong>for</strong> a parent’s or custodial parent’s blanket <strong>consent</strong> <strong>for</strong> emergency treatmentin advance of an emergency is one useful way to avoid confusion and delays should the patient requireemergency care when a parent or legal guardian is not present.Page 2 of 3


Documenting in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong><strong>The</strong> patient’s treatment record should reflect: 1) that the patient read the <strong>for</strong>m in Korean and had allquestions answered in Korean, 2) who translated the questions and answers during the discussion, and 3)whether the patient <strong>consent</strong>ed or refused treatment as proposed.Nothing in Cali<strong>for</strong>nia law specifies a means <strong>for</strong> documenting the in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> discussion. At minimum,the patient record should document the fact that the patient received in<strong>for</strong>mation about risks, benefits andalternatives and <strong>consent</strong>ed to or refused the proposed treatment or procedure. Where the proposed treatment orprocedure is extensive, invasive or risky, a written in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> <strong>for</strong>m is recommended <strong>for</strong> facilitating anddocumenting the discussion.Content of in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> <strong>for</strong>msForms <strong>for</strong> many procedures are available through professional liability insurers, commercial vendors and dentalspecialty organizations. Many dentists customize purchased <strong>for</strong>ms or develop their own <strong>for</strong>ms. In either case,adequate <strong>for</strong>ms should address the nature of the proposed treatment, benefits and alternatives, risks and thepotential consequences of not per<strong>for</strong>ming treatment, as well as enable the dentist to include in<strong>for</strong>mation specificto the case at hand. <strong>The</strong> <strong>for</strong>m should be signed by the patient, the dentist and a witness. <strong>The</strong> patient shouldreceive a copy of the <strong>for</strong>m and the original should be kept in the patient’s chart.Summary• Obtaining in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> involves providing the patient with in<strong>for</strong>mation about the nature of theproposed treatment, the benefits and alternatives of the proposed treatment, the risks of treatment, as well asany other in<strong>for</strong>mation specific to the patient’s unique condition. Patients who refuse treatment must bein<strong>for</strong>med of the potential consequences of their decision.• In<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> is a process, not a <strong>for</strong>m. It involves a face-to-face discussion between the dentist andpatient, thus a translator is needed if the dentist and the patient do not speak the same language. <strong>The</strong>discussion should be conducted with sufficient time to address all of the patient’s questions and concerns.<strong>The</strong> task of obtaining a patient’s in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> cannot be delegated to staff.• <strong>The</strong> in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> discussion should be documented in the patient record, although the law does notspecify the means by which this is done. It should indicate: 1) that the patient read the in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong><strong>for</strong>m in Korean and had all questions answered in Korean, 2) who translated the questions and answersduring the discussion, and 3) whether the patient <strong>consent</strong>ed or refused treatment as proposed.• <strong>The</strong> in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> discussion, even if properly conducted and documented, does not absolutely insulatethe dentist from an allegation of negligence or lack of in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong>. However, being able to supplydocumentation of the discussion often dissuades patients from pursuing a complaint. In all cases, thoroughdocumentation greatly increases the dentist’s chance of successfully defending against such allegations.For more in<strong>for</strong>mationFor more in<strong>for</strong>mation about in<strong>for</strong>med <strong>consent</strong> call 800.733.0634 or fax your request to 916.498.6175.Page 3 of 3Korean - CA

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!