Forvaltningsmuseenes og NIKUs ansvar og roller i forvaltningen av ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

23The way ahead: The ideas of the administrative museumsand NIKU concerning the development of goodmanagement modelsThe ideas for new models set forth by the administrative museumsand NIKU in relation to expert advice, recommendations andarchaeological surveys are based partly on the financial aspects ofthe current system, and partly on the way academic disciplines andprofessional roles are divided.The administrative museums want particularly to have a system offunding which secures adequate funding for activities such asartefact management, conservation, research and outreach, all ofwhich are currently funded by the basic allocations dispensed bythe Ministry of Education and Research and Ministry of CulturalAffairs respectively.With regard to ship finds and automatically listed underwaterartefacts and sites, the scientific communities tend to be rathersmall. This weakens preparedness. In the view of theadministrative museums themselves, one has the option either toincrease funding to ensure current capacity at the maritimemuseums or to gather activities together in one or two largercentres. A third option would be to let the university museums dothe work of managing all the automatically listed artefacts and sitesand ship finds, after the model of Tromsø Museum and ScienceMuseum NTNU.The different options will have consequences of both a scientificand economic nature, and each should be considered in light ofthe impact on efforts to achieve the policy goals informing themanagement of the Norwegian cultural heritage. This should beevaluated further.A secondary issue here concerns the storage of ship finds. Shouldthey be stored together at the university museums or, in line withthe current system, let the maritime museums, including TromsøMuseum and Science Museum NTNU, be in charge of classifyingand storing ship finds, while the other university museums classifyand store other artefacts discovered in connection with themanagement of automatically listed objects and sites.Several interviewees also spoke of the somewhat fragmentarynature of the system of heritage management, expressing a wish toNIBR-rapport 2012:30
24see a more integrated, rounded management structure, whichallows them to see all of their administrative archaeological dutiesin a wider context. The current tripartite model, some feel, ischallenging and needs tightening thematically. One solution wouldbe to create a tighter web of responsibilities, unitingresponsibilities for medieval urban sites and other automaticallylisted artefacts and sites. Or the management of automaticallylisted artefacts and sites on land and under water could bemodelled on the system practised at Tromsø Museum and ScienceMuseum NTNU.These strategies must also be considered in light of whether it willbe possible to find adequate funding models so that the benefits ofcloser integration can be realized.NIBR-rapport 2012:30
Page 1 and 2: NIBR-rapport 2012:30Arne HolmTrine
Page 3 and 4: Andre publikasjoner fra NIBR:NIBR-r
Page 5 and 6: Tittel:Forfatter:Forvaltningsmuseen
Page 7 and 8: 2InnholdForord ....................
Page 9 and 10: 48 Rolle- og ansvarsfordeling innen
Page 11 and 12: 6SammendragArne Holm og Trine Myrvo
Page 13 and 14: 8Historisk sett har imidlertid forv
Page 15 and 16: 10Rammebetingelser og håndtering a
Page 17 and 18: 12Universitetsmuseene har også en
Page 19 and 20: 14vann, etter modell av Tromsø mus
Page 21 and 22: 16and drawbacks of the current syst
Page 23 and 24: 18knowledge is by involving the uni
Page 25 and 26: 20of the university museums on auto
Page 27: 22management are attended to. Four
Page 31 and 32: 26kulturminner i middelalderbyene m
Page 33 and 34: 28mulighet for å finne ut om det e
Page 35 and 36: 30Det store mangfoldet i de ni inst
Page 37 and 38: 32Det heter videre at:Det er et nas
Page 39 and 40: 34Dette innebærer at det er fylkes
Page 41 and 42: 36Tabell 2.1 Forvaltningsmuseenes o
Page 43 and 44: 38Gjennom universitetsmuseenes ansv
Page 45 and 46: 40inn under Kunnskapsdepartementets
Page 47 and 48: 42−Utgifter til særskilt granskn
Page 49 and 50: 44med fra tre til syv informanter.
Page 51 and 52: 46som må være oppfylt for at utse
Page 53 and 54: 484.3 Etableringen av kulturminnefo
Page 55 and 56: 50Samisk kulturminneråd ble oppret
Page 57 and 58: 52I sin artikkel om museene i den a
Page 59 and 60: 54Et tilleggsmoment her er at unive
Page 61 and 62: 56få frem variasjonene i rammebeti
Page 63 and 64: 58Den konkrete arkeologiske utgravn
Page 65 and 66: 60−−−Konservering og innlemmi
Page 67 and 68: 62Riksantikvaren setter i tilsagnsb
Page 69 and 70: 64Grunnbevilgning/basisbevilgning f
Page 71 and 72: 66De tre sjøfartsmuseene er egne s
Page 73 and 74: 68Ved NIKU er alle arkeologiske und
Page 75 and 76: 70inneholder bare ett eller et fåt
Page 77 and 78: 72stiftelser i henholdsvis Stavange
Page 79 and 80:
745.7 FinansieringssystemetEt vikti
Page 81 and 82:
76administrasjon, renhold, datatekn
Page 83 and 84:
78−−−Institusjonsform og -til
Page 85 and 86:
80Generelt kan vi si at jo mer forv
Page 87 and 88:
82Utover de tryggere rammene rundt
Page 89 and 90:
84Mange informanter ved forvaltning
Page 91 and 92:
86Marinarkeologi har for liten tyng
Page 93 and 94:
88Tabell 6.1 Forvaltningsmuseenes e
Page 95 and 96:
90De fleste informantene vi har sna
Page 97 and 98:
92Ved et par av museene er en tydel
Page 99 and 100:
94universitetene. Universitetsmusee
Page 101 and 102:
96nivået. Dette synes å ha mer ba
Page 103 and 104:
98Sikringsarbeid er et av de områd
Page 105 and 106:
100Institusjonstilknytning ser ut t
Page 107 and 108:
102ressurser innenfor både persona
Page 109 and 110:
104utgravningene også skal bidra t
Page 111 and 112:
106de i noen grad kan styre datainn
Page 113 and 114:
108Tabell 7.1 Finansieringskilder f
Page 115 and 116:
110Det er meget vanskelig for et mu
Page 117 and 118:
112særlige finansieringer ved Univ
Page 119 and 120:
1147.3 FormidlingForvaltningsmuseen
Page 121 and 122:
116universitetsmuseenes basisbevilg
Page 123 and 124:
118kulturminnet graves ut, dokument
Page 125 and 126:
120at viktige støttefunksjoner for
Page 127 and 128:
122museene som er egne stiftelser e
Page 129 and 130:
124arkeologiske undersøkelser og i
Page 131 and 132:
126NIKU på sin side hevder å ha b
Page 133 and 134:
128LitteraturGaukstad, Even (2005)
show all

Forvaltningsmuseenes og NIKUs ansvar og roller i forvaltningen av ...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?