INTERPOL HANDBOOK ON DNA DATA EXCHANGE AND PRACTICE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

eferences1 Retrieved from: www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=398832 Retrieved from: www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/html/codis1.htm3 Retrieved from: www.enfsi.eu/index.php4Retrieved from: www.enfsi.eu/5 Retrieved from: www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/html/codis1.htm6 Retrieved from: www.unhchr.ch/udhr/lang/eng.htm7 Retrieved from: portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13177&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html8 Retrieved from: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=17720&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html9 Retrieved from: http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=31058&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201.html10 The Innocence Project, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University, available at http://www.innocenceproject.org (accessed 1 June 2008).11 National Conference of State Legislatures, available at http://www.ncsl.org/programs/health/genetics/DNAchart.htm (accessed 1 June 2008).12 Saks, M. J., Constantine, L., Dolezal, M., Garcia, J., Titus, C., Horton, G., Leavell, T., Muntz, J., Rivera, L.,Stewart, J., Strumpf, F. and VanderHaar, H. (2001) Towards a model Act for the prevention and remedy oferroneous convictions. New England Law Review 35: 669-683.13Liebman, J. S., Fagan, J., West, V. and Lloyd, J. (2000) Capital attrition: error rates in capital cases, 1973-1995.Texas Law Review 78: 1839-1865.14The Queen v. Sean Hoey, In the Crown Court Sitting in Northern Ireland, Bill No: 341/05, 20 Dec. 2007.15 National Research Council, Committee on DNA Technology in Forensic Science,. (1992) DNATechnology in Forensic Science, 86-87.16 Bieber, F.R., Brenner, C.H., Lazer, D. (2006) Finding Criminals Through DNA of Their Relatives. Science,Vol.312, No 5778, 1315-1616. From DNA of Family, a Tool to Make Arrests, Ellen Nakashima, WashingtonPost, April 21, 2008.17 Dolan, M., Felch, J. (2008) State offers police extra DNA tool: California will use partial matches fromrelatives in its genetic database to try to track down criminals. Los Angeles Times, April 26, 2008.18 2008 Maryland Laws, Chapter 337, available at http://mlis.state.md.us/2008rs/chapters_noln/Ch_337_sb0211E.pdf.19 Greely, H.T., Riordan, D.P., Garrison, N.A., Mountain, J.L. (2006) Family Ties: The Use of DNA OffenderDatabases to Catch Offenders’ Kin. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Volume 34:2, 251-254.DNA Technology in Forensic Science, Committee on DNA Technology in Forensic Science, NationalResearch Council, 1992 (p. 86);20 Bieber, F.R., Brenner, C.H., Lazer, D. (2006) Finding Criminals Through DNA of Their Relatives. Science,Vol.312, No 5778, 1315-1616.21 Willing, R. (2006) DNA Database can flag suspects through relatives. USA Today.PAGE 110references
22 Greely, H.T., Riordan, D.P., Garrison, N.A., Mountain, J.L. (2006) Family Ties: The Use of DNA OffenderDatabases to Catch Offenders’ Kin. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Volume 34:2, 251-254.23 Williams, R., Johnson, P. (2006) Inclusiveness, Effectiveness and Intrusiveness: Issues in the DevelopingUses of DNA Profiling in Support of Criminal Investigations. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Vol. 34:2,242-245.24 Pericic, M., Lauc, L.B., Klaric, I.M., Janicijevic, B. & Rudan, P. (2005) Review of Croatian Genetic Heritage asrevealed by mitochondrial DNA and Y chromosomal lineages. Croatian Medical Journal 46(4): 502-513.25 Cann, R.L., Stoneking, M. and Wilson, A.C. (1987) Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature 325:31-36.26 Wilson, M.R., Polanskey, D., Butler, J.M., DiZinno, J.A., Replogle, J. and Budowle, B. (1995) Extraction, PCRamplification and sequencing of mitochondrial DNA from human hair shafts. BioTechniques 18: 662-66927Anderson, T.D., Ross, J.P., Roby, R.K., Lee, D.A. and Holland, M.M. (1999) A validation study for theextraction and analysis of DNA from human nail material and its application to forensic casework. Journalof Forensic Sciences 44: 1053-1056.28 Bender, K., Schneider, P.M. and Rittner, C. (2000) Application of mtDNA sequence analysis in forensiccasework for the identification of human remains. Forensic Science International 113: 103-107.29 Lorente, J.A., Entrala, C., Alvarez, J.C., Lorente, M., Arce, B., Heinrich, B., Carrasco, F., Budowle, B. andVillanueva, E. (2002) Social benefits on non-criminal genetic databases: missing persons and human remainsidentification. International Journal of Legal Medicine 116: 187-190.30Roby, R.K., Daoudi, Y., Dietz, S., McIntosh, T., Rogers, Y.-H., Reardon, M., Stockwell, T. and Adams, M.Automation of forensic mitochondrial DNA analysis in response to the attack on America. In Proceedingsof 16th International Australian and New Zealand Forensic Science Society Symposium on the ForensicSciences, Canberra, ACT, 13-17 May 2002.31 Holland, M.M., Cave, C.A., Holland, C.A. and Bille, T.W. (2003) Development of a quality, high throughputDNA analysis procedure for skeletal samples to assist with the identification of victims from the worldtrade centre attacks. Croatian Medical Journal 44: 264-272.32 Wilson, M.R. & Allard, M.W. (2004) Phylogenetic and mitochondrial DNA. Forensic Science Review 16: 37-62.33 Parson W, Dür A. (2007) EMPOP—A forensic mtDNA Database. Forensic Science International: Genetics1(2): 88-92. Retrieved from www.empop.org34 Parson W, Brandstätter A, Pircher M, Steinlechner M and Scheithauer R. (2004) EMPOP—the EDNAPmtDNA population database concept for a new generation, high-quality mtDNA Database. InternationalCongress Series 1261: 106-108.35 Gill, P. (2001) An assessment of the utility of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for forensicpurposes. International Journal of Legal Medicine 114: 204-210.36 Jobling, M.A., Pandya, A. and Tyler-Smith, C. (1997) The Y chromosome in forensic analysis and paternitytesting. International Journal of Legal Medicine 110: 118-124.37 Kayser, M., Caglia, A., et al. (1997) Evaluation of Y-chromosomal STRs: a multicenter study. InternationalJournal of Legal Medicine 110: 125-133.38 Dettlaff-Kakol, A. and Pawlowski, R. (2002) The first Polish DNA «manhumnt» - an application ofY-chromosome STR’s. International Journal of Legal Medicine 116: 289-291.39 Dziegelewski, M., Simich, J.P. and Rittenhouse-Olsen, K. (2002) Use of a Y chromosome probe as an aid inthe forensic proof of sexual assault. Journal of Forensic Sciences 47: 601 - 604.REFERENCES PAGE 111
Page 1 and 2:
INTERPOLINTERPOL HANDBOOK ONDNA DAT
Page 3 and 4:
INTERPOLINTERPOL HANDBOOK ONDNA DAT
Page 5 and 6:
dna investigative considerations .
Page 7 and 8:
INTRODUCTIONby ronald k. noblethe s
Page 9 and 10:
•back to basics: the use of dna i
Page 11 and 12:
•the dna databaseThe INTERPOL DNA
Page 13 and 14:
PART i: CASE SCENARIOFICTITIOUS SCE
Page 15 and 16:
He cautiously pushes the door open
Page 17 and 18:
The only obvious item of evidential
Page 19 and 20:
• Consider physical evidence that
Page 21 and 22:
DNA SAMPLINGAND EVIDENCE COLLECTION
Page 23 and 24:
•crime scene investigator (csi)Wh
Page 25 and 26:
•potential sources of dnaThere ar
Page 27 and 28:
Open the sampling kit and ensure th
Page 29 and 30:
If at any time during the sampling
Page 31:
IN THE LABORATORYOnce evidence has
Page 34 and 35:
INTERPRETATION OF THE DNA PROFILEAs
Page 36:
THE MATCH REPORTTo get to step 5 of
Page 43:
QUALITY ASSURANCEQuality principles
Page 47 and 48:
to ensure the best possible results
Page 49 and 50:
•in-laboratory trainingAnother as
Page 51 and 52:
•key education requirementAnother
Page 53 and 54:
PART II: an overviewdna databasesPA
Page 55 and 56:
With the increasing use of DNA prof
Page 57 and 58:
INTERPOLMember CountryCrimeSceneRef
Page 59 and 60:
THE VALUE OF A NATIONAL DNA DATABAS
Page 61 and 62: ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DNADATABA
Page 63 and 64: •need for a dna databaseOnce the
Page 65 and 66: PublicityOnce a database has been e
Page 67 and 68: It is not only the individual who i
Page 69 and 70: LEGISLATIONSpecific legislation is
Page 71: In conclusion, legislation has to f
Page 74 and 75: THE USE OF POST-CONVICTION DNA TEST
Page 76 and 77: FAMILIAL SEARCHINGThe idea that a D
Page 78 and 79: “Familial searching” has its ad
Page 80 and 81: Recent progress in the forensic use
Page 82 and 83: The most informative target loci fo
Page 84 and 85: Another obvious issue associated wi
Page 86 and 87: APPENDIX 1INTERPOL Standard Set of
Page 88 and 89: 1 16 DNA CODE:VWA THO1 D21S11 FGA D
Page 90 and 91: the process of dna analysisThe biol
Page 92 and 93: AnalysisThe data generated by elect
Page 94 and 95: NameTH01, TPOX,CSF1POmonoplexes(sil
Page 96 and 97: APPENDIX 4questions around anintell
Page 98 and 99: APPENDIX 5DNA FACT SHEETDNA Profili
Page 100 and 101: APPENDIX 6interpol dna search reque
Page 102 and 103: APPENDIX 7recommendationsfrom the e
Page 104 and 105: 21. As a national DNA-database regu
Page 106 and 107: Glossary1-24/7AlleleAmelogeninBiolo
Page 108 and 109: Member CountriesMitochondrial DNA(m
Page 110 and 111: ABBREVIATIONSaimsascld/labasipbelte
Page 114 and 115: 40 Sibille, I., Duverneuil, C., Lor
Page 117 and 118: OIPC-INTERPOL200, Quai Chales de Ga
show all

INTERPOL HANDBOOK ON DNA DATA EXCHANGE AND PRACTICE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?