Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in ... - Ninti One
Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in ... - Ninti One Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in ... - Ninti One
The mind-map above shows the process of doing the focus groups, and how the data from them were made usefulfor analysis. The facilitation worked best with pairs or small teams of researchers working together. At this stagein the research cycle the researchers’ jobs included:Facilitating – the person who asked the questions, showed the photos and kept the group on track in thediscussionRecording – the person who set up and ran the audio recorder, took photos of the procedure, collectedand managed the signed paperwork for the informed consent from participantsTranscribing – the people who played back the audio, and translated the sentences into English for theperson typing up the focus group notes.c) 4. Mapping the processThe photos below were the photo elicitation sheets the researchers used to guide the focus group discussions andhelp bring people’s attention to the topic. We then used transcripts from the focus groups to create the mind mapsbelow that show the findings of the research cycle. They were useful in bringing key points of concern and idea foractions to the attention of the researchers.48 Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in Remote Service Delivery at Ntaria
Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in Remote Service Delivery at Ntaria 49
- Page 1 and 2: Final Report:Strengthening Communit
- Page 3 and 4: ContentsGlossary ..................
- Page 5 and 6: GlossaryUseful terms to understand
- Page 7 and 8: Executive summaryThis final project
- Page 9 and 10: 1. IntroductionThis section introdu
- Page 11 and 12: engage Ntaria residents in doing co
- Page 13 and 14: Carole RaggettCommunity ResearcherJ
- Page 15 and 16: Describe who commissioned the resea
- Page 17 and 18: Critical Success Factor 5: Completi
- Page 19 and 20: Action Inquiries only RecruitmentNi
- Page 21 and 22: Physical work environment.The most
- Page 23 and 24: Learning Evaluation Worksheet OneQu
- Page 25 and 26: Question 7: The most useful things
- Page 27 and 28: Other comments were added when the
- Page 29 and 30: 3.4.2.2 Implications for skills dev
- Page 31 and 32: data from a relatively small popula
- Page 33 and 34: • Less people die on the roads. I
- Page 35 and 36: Ada Lechleitner surveying staff at
- Page 37 and 38: Question 3: Would You Drive Unsafe
- Page 39 and 40: Question 9: The Car You Drive Is Al
- Page 41 and 42: In the case of medical emergency pe
- Page 43 and 44: In light of these results we asked
- Page 45 and 46: a) Overall FaHCSIA project: LIP Eco
- Page 47: c) 2. Plan and prepareInformed cons
- Page 51 and 52: Outcomes: The outcomes of analysing
- Page 53 and 54: Bush Mechanics: The role of knowled
- Page 55 and 56: 4.5 Background to the Wurla Nyinta
- Page 57 and 58: From November 2011 to March 2012 a
- Page 59 and 60: 2011JanuaryFebruaryNTER RSD/COAG NT
- Page 61 and 62: Wurla Nyinta represents the whole c
- Page 63 and 64: 4.6.4 Data collected1. Unta antjana
- Page 65 and 66: 4. Male-artwa / Female-arrkutja (n=
- Page 67 and 68: 6. Ira tjina ungkwanga (Are you rel
- Page 69 and 70: 8. Unta etna-akela ultha purtala us
- Page 71 and 72: 10. Awa-paka nanha eperra unta wurr
- Page 73 and 74: 12. Awa-paka nanha eperra unta wurr
- Page 75 and 76: Table B: The total number of servic
- Page 77 and 78: 14. Unta arama Wurla Nyinta-ala cha
- Page 79 and 80: Table D: This bar chart shows for t
- Page 81 and 82: In summary, the tables showing the
- Page 83 and 84: The subsequent research cycle (Vehi
- Page 85 and 86: Schedule A: Local Implementation Pl
- Page 87 and 88: A process for engaging, recruiting
- Page 89 and 90: The involvement of the research tea
- Page 91 and 92: 8. Conclusions8.1 Observations abou
- Page 93 and 94: Perceptions of governanceExtensive
- Page 95 and 96: esearchers have facilitated an incr
- Page 97 and 98: ReferencesBrydon-Miller M. 2001. Ed
The m<strong>in</strong>d-map above shows the process of do<strong>in</strong>g the focus groups, and how the data from them were made usefulfor analysis. The facilitation worked best with pairs or small teams of researchers work<strong>in</strong>g together. At this stage<strong>in</strong> the research cycle the researchers’ jobs <strong>in</strong>cluded:Facilitat<strong>in</strong>g – the person who asked the questions, showed the photos and kept the group on track <strong>in</strong> thediscussionRecord<strong>in</strong>g – the person who set up and ran the audio recorder, took photos of the procedure, collectedand managed the signed paperwork for the <strong>in</strong>formed consent from participantsTranscrib<strong>in</strong>g – the people who played back the audio, and translated the sentences <strong>in</strong>to English for theperson typ<strong>in</strong>g up the focus group notes.c) 4. Mapp<strong>in</strong>g the processThe photos below were the photo elicitation sheets the researchers used to guide the focus group discussions andhelp br<strong>in</strong>g people’s attention to the topic. We then used transcripts from the focus groups to create the m<strong>in</strong>d mapsbelow that show the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs of the research cycle. They were useful <strong>in</strong> br<strong>in</strong>g<strong>in</strong>g key po<strong>in</strong>ts of concern and idea foractions to the attention of the researchers.48 <strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>Report</strong>: <strong>Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Remote Service Delivery at Ntaria