Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in ... - Ninti One
Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in ... - Ninti One Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in ... - Ninti One
987654321081full licence disqualified need to getlicence46no licenceThis chart indicated the age groups of people whoparticipated in the focus groupsThis graph shows us how many people in the focus groupheld a full licence, were disqualified, or needed to get alicence. The final column shows how many people hadnever held a licence.These demographics describe the research participants in a way that is quantitative; that is, they use numbers totell us how many, of what. The focus group data collected in this research is qualitative; that is, the researchersused conversations in Arrarnta to discuss a theme the researchers identified. The background information used indesigning the research is the quantitative data from the Safe driving survey (Lovell et al. 2011) and the visual datamade by the researchers for photo elicitation. A series of mind maps is used here to report the themes ofconversation, as revealed by listening to the recordings of the focus group discussions.4.4.2 Analysis of dataThis section ‘unpacks’ each of the action research cycle steps by using mind-map diagrams. Mind-maps give us avisual way of working with a lot of different points. They each represent part of the structure of how the researchwas approached, what the researchers did, what the focus group participants told us and how we interpretedthese results to write the recommendations. At the conclusion we set out the findings and recommendations theresearchers will provide to Wurla Nyinta.44 Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in Remote Service Delivery at Ntaria
a) Overall FaHCSIA project: LIP Economic Participation Desired Community Outcomeb) Overall project leads to Vehicle Safety Focus Groups – using the PAR model the researchers worked throughthese four steps:Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in Remote Service Delivery at Ntaria 45
- Page 1 and 2: Final Report:Strengthening Communit
- Page 3 and 4: ContentsGlossary ..................
- Page 5 and 6: GlossaryUseful terms to understand
- Page 7 and 8: Executive summaryThis final project
- Page 9 and 10: 1. IntroductionThis section introdu
- Page 11 and 12: engage Ntaria residents in doing co
- Page 13 and 14: Carole RaggettCommunity ResearcherJ
- Page 15 and 16: Describe who commissioned the resea
- Page 17 and 18: Critical Success Factor 5: Completi
- Page 19 and 20: Action Inquiries only RecruitmentNi
- Page 21 and 22: Physical work environment.The most
- Page 23 and 24: Learning Evaluation Worksheet OneQu
- Page 25 and 26: Question 7: The most useful things
- Page 27 and 28: Other comments were added when the
- Page 29 and 30: 3.4.2.2 Implications for skills dev
- Page 31 and 32: data from a relatively small popula
- Page 33 and 34: • Less people die on the roads. I
- Page 35 and 36: Ada Lechleitner surveying staff at
- Page 37 and 38: Question 3: Would You Drive Unsafe
- Page 39 and 40: Question 9: The Car You Drive Is Al
- Page 41 and 42: In the case of medical emergency pe
- Page 43: In light of these results we asked
- Page 47 and 48: c) 2. Plan and prepareInformed cons
- Page 49 and 50: Final Report: Strengthening Communi
- Page 51 and 52: Outcomes: The outcomes of analysing
- Page 53 and 54: Bush Mechanics: The role of knowled
- Page 55 and 56: 4.5 Background to the Wurla Nyinta
- Page 57 and 58: From November 2011 to March 2012 a
- Page 59 and 60: 2011JanuaryFebruaryNTER RSD/COAG NT
- Page 61 and 62: Wurla Nyinta represents the whole c
- Page 63 and 64: 4.6.4 Data collected1. Unta antjana
- Page 65 and 66: 4. Male-artwa / Female-arrkutja (n=
- Page 67 and 68: 6. Ira tjina ungkwanga (Are you rel
- Page 69 and 70: 8. Unta etna-akela ultha purtala us
- Page 71 and 72: 10. Awa-paka nanha eperra unta wurr
- Page 73 and 74: 12. Awa-paka nanha eperra unta wurr
- Page 75 and 76: Table B: The total number of servic
- Page 77 and 78: 14. Unta arama Wurla Nyinta-ala cha
- Page 79 and 80: Table D: This bar chart shows for t
- Page 81 and 82: In summary, the tables showing the
- Page 83 and 84: The subsequent research cycle (Vehi
- Page 85 and 86: Schedule A: Local Implementation Pl
- Page 87 and 88: A process for engaging, recruiting
- Page 89 and 90: The involvement of the research tea
- Page 91 and 92: 8. Conclusions8.1 Observations abou
- Page 93 and 94: Perceptions of governanceExtensive
987654321081full licence disqualified need to getlicence46no licenceThis chart <strong>in</strong>dicated the age groups of people whoparticipated <strong>in</strong> the focus groupsThis graph shows us how many people <strong>in</strong> the focus groupheld a full licence, were disqualified, or needed to get alicence. The f<strong>in</strong>al column shows how many people hadnever held a licence.These demographics describe the research participants <strong>in</strong> a way that is quantitative; that is, they use numbers totell us how many, of what. The focus group data collected <strong>in</strong> this research is qualitative; that is, the researchersused conversations <strong>in</strong> Arrarnta to discuss a theme the researchers identified. The background <strong>in</strong>formation used <strong>in</strong>design<strong>in</strong>g the research is the quantitative data from the Safe driv<strong>in</strong>g survey (Lovell et al. 2011) and the visual datamade by the researchers for photo elicitation. A series of m<strong>in</strong>d maps is used here to report the themes ofconversation, as revealed by listen<strong>in</strong>g to the record<strong>in</strong>gs of the focus group discussions.4.4.2 Analysis of dataThis section ‘unpacks’ each of the action research cycle steps by us<strong>in</strong>g m<strong>in</strong>d-map diagrams. M<strong>in</strong>d-maps give us avisual way of work<strong>in</strong>g with a lot of different po<strong>in</strong>ts. They each represent part of the structure of how the researchwas approached, what the researchers did, what the focus group participants told us and how we <strong>in</strong>terpretedthese results to write the recommendations. At the conclusion we set out the f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs and recommendations theresearchers will provide to Wurla Ny<strong>in</strong>ta.44 <strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>Report</strong>: <strong>Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Remote Service Delivery at Ntaria