Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in ... - Ninti One
Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in ... - Ninti One Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in ... - Ninti One
4. Participatory Action Research cycles4.1 MethodsThe methods used for the research are described in detail in section 2.2.1. of this report. They followed a cyclicalprocess that began with identifying the topic then doing a survey using questions designed to explore the key issuesand gather relevant information. This was the first cycle. Reflection on the results of the survey enabled a secondcycle to be designed to collect further data on specific aspects of the subject. Methods used were therefore aquestionnaire-based survey for the first cycle and focus groups for the second cycle.5 Ninti OneCommunityResearchersLIP recommendation for Social worker tohelp families get children to school.Researchers to investigate whether thisjob is better done by local people. If so,What training would be appropriate forthe employee to be undertaking?Improving school attendance;Increasing number of local peopleemployed in professional andmanagement roles4.2 Ethics, protocols and consentFor this project Ninti One applied for clearance from the Central Australian Human Research Ethics committee(CAHREC). 4 This permission from CAHREC meant that Ninti One and all the researchers it employed agreed to followrules to make sure their work, their behaviour and their methods were ethical.Additionally, Ninti One introduced community researchers, as part of their employment induction, to ethical practicesunderpinned in the publication Aboriginal Knowledge and Intellectual Property Protocol Community Guide produced byDesert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre (DKCRC) and Waltja Tjutangku Palyapayi (Orr et al. 2009).4.3 Research project on vehicle safety: Research Cycle 1In order to identify the research topic for Research Cycle One we identified the information in the LIP which related toWurla Nyinta taking a lead role to achieve a Community Action outcome, then triangulated it with the Ntaria BaselineMapping information pertaining to those same areas, and the response of researchers, the cultural advisor and others tothe ways research might be useful, important and relevant to informing the work of Wurla Nyinta in making decisionsfor the community. This led us to identify and discuss several options.4.3.1 Research subjectIssues related to use of vehicles, driver disqualification, drink driving and driver training in the community emerged asthe most important and relevant to the interests of the research team. The idea of a safe driving survey tested positivelywith others such as health, education, police and employment officers.This topic is relevant to a number of COAG targets: Health, Economic Participation, Safe Communities, Governance andLeadership. The LIP includes Safe Driving as an intended outcome (Commonwealth of Australia 2010) in the currentagreement signed on 2 March 2010:4 See Ethics application - Intellectual property (Ntaria and Yuendumu), email to FaHCSIA Wed 2/02/2011 3:51 PM32 Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in Remote Service Delivery at Ntaria
• Less people die on the roads. In-community road safety driver training programs are provided. Ntariacommunity members learn safe driving practices, access driver training and acquire drivers’ licences.Safe Driving is written into the LIP as a Community Action, in which Wurla Nyinta and the broader community areexpected to take a lead role. Building the research around this provides leverage for Wurla Nyinta to engage servicedelivery to support programs for Ntaria that will assist in achieving this action.The survey instrument for Safe Driving was developed and delivered to 20% of the demographic, against age groupsranging from 18 to 60. The exclusion of data from older people was made at the direction of the community researcherswho indicated that very few people aged over 60 drive. The results of this survey are shown as Action Research CycleOne: A Safe Driving Survey at Ntaria.Roslyn Raberrabera doing the Safe Driving at Ntaria Survey with local residents4.3.2 Participatory Action Research designIn this project with Ntaria, Ninti One researchers developed the following PAR method that includes four primary steps,each one requiring specific actions.1. Discuss, consultThis step involves thinking within the parameters of the research contract and asking open questions help to‘find’ the potential research focus: What is the client asking for? Who are the other stakeholders and which of their opinions are important? What can literature or evidence from other studies tell us that helps?Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in Remote Service Delivery at Ntaria 33
- Page 1 and 2: Final Report:Strengthening Communit
- Page 3 and 4: ContentsGlossary ..................
- Page 5 and 6: GlossaryUseful terms to understand
- Page 7 and 8: Executive summaryThis final project
- Page 9 and 10: 1. IntroductionThis section introdu
- Page 11 and 12: engage Ntaria residents in doing co
- Page 13 and 14: Carole RaggettCommunity ResearcherJ
- Page 15 and 16: Describe who commissioned the resea
- Page 17 and 18: Critical Success Factor 5: Completi
- Page 19 and 20: Action Inquiries only RecruitmentNi
- Page 21 and 22: Physical work environment.The most
- Page 23 and 24: Learning Evaluation Worksheet OneQu
- Page 25 and 26: Question 7: The most useful things
- Page 27 and 28: Other comments were added when the
- Page 29 and 30: 3.4.2.2 Implications for skills dev
- Page 31: data from a relatively small popula
- Page 35 and 36: Ada Lechleitner surveying staff at
- Page 37 and 38: Question 3: Would You Drive Unsafe
- Page 39 and 40: Question 9: The Car You Drive Is Al
- Page 41 and 42: In the case of medical emergency pe
- Page 43 and 44: In light of these results we asked
- Page 45 and 46: a) Overall FaHCSIA project: LIP Eco
- Page 47 and 48: c) 2. Plan and prepareInformed cons
- Page 49 and 50: Final Report: Strengthening Communi
- Page 51 and 52: Outcomes: The outcomes of analysing
- Page 53 and 54: Bush Mechanics: The role of knowled
- Page 55 and 56: 4.5 Background to the Wurla Nyinta
- Page 57 and 58: From November 2011 to March 2012 a
- Page 59 and 60: 2011JanuaryFebruaryNTER RSD/COAG NT
- Page 61 and 62: Wurla Nyinta represents the whole c
- Page 63 and 64: 4.6.4 Data collected1. Unta antjana
- Page 65 and 66: 4. Male-artwa / Female-arrkutja (n=
- Page 67 and 68: 6. Ira tjina ungkwanga (Are you rel
- Page 69 and 70: 8. Unta etna-akela ultha purtala us
- Page 71 and 72: 10. Awa-paka nanha eperra unta wurr
- Page 73 and 74: 12. Awa-paka nanha eperra unta wurr
- Page 75 and 76: Table B: The total number of servic
- Page 77 and 78: 14. Unta arama Wurla Nyinta-ala cha
- Page 79 and 80: Table D: This bar chart shows for t
- Page 81 and 82: In summary, the tables showing the
4. Participatory Action <strong>Research</strong> cycles4.1 MethodsThe methods used for the research are described <strong>in</strong> detail <strong>in</strong> section 2.2.1. of this report. They followed a cyclicalprocess that began with identify<strong>in</strong>g the topic then do<strong>in</strong>g a survey us<strong>in</strong>g questions designed to explore the key issuesand gather relevant <strong>in</strong>formation. This was the first cycle. Reflection on the results of the survey enabled a secondcycle to be designed to collect further data on specific aspects of the subject. Methods used were therefore aquestionnaire-based survey for the first cycle and focus groups for the second cycle.5 N<strong>in</strong>ti <strong>One</strong><strong>Community</strong><strong>Research</strong>ersLIP recommendation for Social worker tohelp families get children to school.<strong>Research</strong>ers to <strong>in</strong>vestigate whether thisjob is better done by local people. If so,What tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g would be appropriate forthe employee to be undertak<strong>in</strong>g?Improv<strong>in</strong>g school attendance;Increas<strong>in</strong>g number of local peopleemployed <strong>in</strong> professional andmanagement roles4.2 Ethics, protocols and consentFor this project N<strong>in</strong>ti <strong>One</strong> applied for clearance from the Central Australian Human <strong>Research</strong> Ethics committee(CAHREC). 4 This permission from CAHREC meant that N<strong>in</strong>ti <strong>One</strong> and all the researchers it employed agreed to followrules to make sure their work, their behaviour and their methods were ethical.Additionally, N<strong>in</strong>ti <strong>One</strong> <strong>in</strong>troduced community researchers, as part of their employment <strong>in</strong>duction, to ethical practicesunderp<strong>in</strong>ned <strong>in</strong> the publication Aborig<strong>in</strong>al Knowledge and Intellectual Property Protocol <strong>Community</strong> Guide produced byDesert Knowledge Cooperative <strong>Research</strong> Centre (DKCRC) and Waltja Tjutangku Palyapayi (Orr et al. 2009).4.3 <strong>Research</strong> project on vehicle safety: <strong>Research</strong> Cycle 1In order to identify the research topic for <strong>Research</strong> Cycle <strong>One</strong> we identified the <strong>in</strong>formation <strong>in</strong> the LIP which related toWurla Ny<strong>in</strong>ta tak<strong>in</strong>g a lead role to achieve a <strong>Community</strong> Action outcome, then triangulated it with the Ntaria Basel<strong>in</strong>eMapp<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation perta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g to those same areas, and the response of researchers, the cultural advisor and others tothe ways research might be useful, important and relevant to <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g the work of Wurla Ny<strong>in</strong>ta <strong>in</strong> mak<strong>in</strong>g decisionsfor the community. This led us to identify and discuss several options.4.3.1 <strong>Research</strong> subjectIssues related to use of vehicles, driver disqualification, dr<strong>in</strong>k driv<strong>in</strong>g and driver tra<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the community emerged asthe most important and relevant to the <strong>in</strong>terests of the research team. The idea of a safe driv<strong>in</strong>g survey tested positivelywith others such as health, education, police and employment officers.This topic is relevant to a number of COAG targets: Health, Economic Participation, Safe Communities, Governance andLeadership. The LIP <strong>in</strong>cludes Safe Driv<strong>in</strong>g as an <strong>in</strong>tended outcome (Commonwealth of Australia 2010) <strong>in</strong> the currentagreement signed on 2 March 2010:4 See Ethics application - Intellectual property (Ntaria and Yuendumu), email to FaHCSIA Wed 2/02/2011 3:51 PM32 <strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>Report</strong>: <strong>Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Remote Service Delivery at Ntaria