Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in ... - Ninti One
Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in ... - Ninti One Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in ... - Ninti One
mentoring and a broad base of skills necessary to take on work that produced tangible outcomes for the remotecommunities and for the funding stakeholders.Katie Abbott (centre) andAnna Marie Armstrong(right) used the tabletcomputer with familieswho are camping for theKuprilya Races1.4 Ntaria community researchersEdward RontjiProject Cultural MentorMark InkamalaCommunity Research LeaderIEO, ROCAda LechleitnerCommunity Research LeaderAnna Marie ArmstrongSenior Community ResearcherRachel KantawaraCommunity ResearcherDion DhamarranydjiCommunity ResearcherKatie AbbottCommunity ResearcherRoslyn RaberaberaCommunity ResearcherElsie PatrickCommunity ResearcherMerissa EmitjaCommunity Researcher12 Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in Remote Service Delivery at Ntaria
Carole RaggettCommunity ResearcherJudith HendersonCommunity Researcher2. The Ntaria community research project2.1 Research questions or objectivesThe local research team played a critical role of informing Wurla Nyinta on aspects of LIP progress and provided toolsand processes for Wurla Nyinta to identify issues.Working in an environment where Wurla Nyinta is asked to make important decisions and contribute tocommunity consultation for the range of LIP actions, the local community research team represented a small butsignificant asset. We designed the research cycles to produce outcomes that would impact on several of theactions in the LIP that are listed as being led by the community.As the research process was participatory, it brought a degree of focus and community discussion to the topic andreturned findings and recommendations that reflect practical outcomes sought by Ntaria residents.This project had two research topics that were selected by the research team as being most relevant to currentcommunity concerns. One of the topics incorporated two cycles.Topic 1: Safe driving at Ntaria Research Cycle 1.1: Survey – Safe driving survey at Ntaria (May 2011) Research Cycle 1.2: Focus groups and photo elicitation – Vehicle Safety Focus groups (August andSeptember 2011)Topic 2: Wurla Nyinta Community Perception Survey (September – November 2011)As a skills assessment activity, a further survey was carried out on the topic of childcare. This survey wascompleted after the second topic of research was begun. It is discussed in more detail in section 4.6 of this report.2.2 Participatory Action Research and researchers as learners2.2.1 The cycle of researchNinti One researchers have used PAR methodologies to undertake community research since 2003, and arefamiliar with widespread and localised developments of its theory and practice (Brydon-Miller 2001; Khan &Chovanec 2010; Lewin 1940; Wadsworth 1998).Final Report: Strengthening Community Research in Remote Service Delivery at Ntaria 13
- Page 1 and 2: Final Report:Strengthening Communit
- Page 3 and 4: ContentsGlossary ..................
- Page 5 and 6: GlossaryUseful terms to understand
- Page 7 and 8: Executive summaryThis final project
- Page 9 and 10: 1. IntroductionThis section introdu
- Page 11: engage Ntaria residents in doing co
- Page 15 and 16: Describe who commissioned the resea
- Page 17 and 18: Critical Success Factor 5: Completi
- Page 19 and 20: Action Inquiries only RecruitmentNi
- Page 21 and 22: Physical work environment.The most
- Page 23 and 24: Learning Evaluation Worksheet OneQu
- Page 25 and 26: Question 7: The most useful things
- Page 27 and 28: Other comments were added when the
- Page 29 and 30: 3.4.2.2 Implications for skills dev
- Page 31 and 32: data from a relatively small popula
- Page 33 and 34: • Less people die on the roads. I
- Page 35 and 36: Ada Lechleitner surveying staff at
- Page 37 and 38: Question 3: Would You Drive Unsafe
- Page 39 and 40: Question 9: The Car You Drive Is Al
- Page 41 and 42: In the case of medical emergency pe
- Page 43 and 44: In light of these results we asked
- Page 45 and 46: a) Overall FaHCSIA project: LIP Eco
- Page 47 and 48: c) 2. Plan and prepareInformed cons
- Page 49 and 50: Final Report: Strengthening Communi
- Page 51 and 52: Outcomes: The outcomes of analysing
- Page 53 and 54: Bush Mechanics: The role of knowled
- Page 55 and 56: 4.5 Background to the Wurla Nyinta
- Page 57 and 58: From November 2011 to March 2012 a
- Page 59 and 60: 2011JanuaryFebruaryNTER RSD/COAG NT
- Page 61 and 62: Wurla Nyinta represents the whole c
mentor<strong>in</strong>g and a broad base of skills necessary to take on work that produced tangible outcomes for the remotecommunities and for the fund<strong>in</strong>g stakeholders.Katie Abbott (centre) andAnna Marie Armstrong(right) used the tabletcomputer with familieswho are camp<strong>in</strong>g for theKuprilya Races1.4 Ntaria community researchersEdward RontjiProject Cultural MentorMark Inkamala<strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong> LeaderIEO, ROCAda Lechleitner<strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong> LeaderAnna Marie ArmstrongSenior <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong>erRachel Kantawara<strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong>erDion Dhamarranydji<strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong>erKatie Abbott<strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong>erRoslyn Raberabera<strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong>erElsie Patrick<strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong>erMerissa Emitja<strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong>er12 <strong>F<strong>in</strong>al</strong> <strong>Report</strong>: <strong>Strengthen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>Community</strong> <strong>Research</strong> <strong>in</strong> Remote Service Delivery at Ntaria