Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia
Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One
Chapter 3 – Modelling Land Erodibility Review• That the models selected cover those across the full range of spatial scales in winderosion modelling applications (from the field to global scales);• That the models contain a representative range of land erodibility and dust sourceparameterisations, employing emission schemes developed from a range of approaches;• That the emission schemes contain a representative sample of empirical and theoreticalformulations; and• That the models selected have been developed for a variety of physical environmentsincluding cultivated lands, rangelands, and broader desert landscapes.Figure 3.1 illustrates the spatial and temporal scales at which the wind erosion modelsreviewed in this chapter operate.Figure 3.1 Space-time plot showing the spatial and temporal scales of wind erosion models reviewedin this chapter. Light gray boxes represent field scale models (Section 3.2), white boxes representregional scale models (Section 3.3), and dark gray boxes represent global scale models (Section 3.4)The first models reviewed are field scale models. These include empirical models designed tosimulate single erosion events at scales of 10 2 to 10 3 m 2 . The second group are the local to70
Chapter 3 – Modelling Land Erodibility Reviewregional scale models. For the purposes of this discussion, regional scale modelling isconsidered to be that where models are applied to areas ~10 4 km 2 , and operating overnumerous landscapes within a region or continent. The final group are the continental toglobal scale models. These models operate at scales >10 4 km 2 , and are applied to simulateglobal scale dust dynamics.3.2 Field Scale Wind Erosion ModelsThis section presents a review of field scale wind erosion models. The models reviewedinclude the Wind Erosion Equation (WEQ), Revised Wind Erosion Equation (RWEQ), WindErosion Stochastic Simulator (WESS), Wind Erosion Prediction System (WEPS), and TexasErosion Analysis Model (TEAM). These models represent a range of approaches forassessing wind erosion from farm fields at different spatial and temporal resolutions. The wayin which land erodibility is quantified in each model is seen as a progression from earlyempirical research with limited computing capability, to more recent process-based studies.3.2.1 Wind Erosion Equation (WEQ)The Wind Erosion Equation (WEQ) was developed by Woodruff and Siddoway (1965) topredict annual soil erosion (kgha -1 ) from farm fields in the United States. WEQ was designedfor both the analysis and management of wind erosion, with a central aim in its developmentbeing to apply the model to determine the effects of field conditions and erosion mitigationstrategies on erosion rates.WEQ was developed from empirical relationships defining the effects of important winderosion controls on soil loss rates. The foundation of WEQ is its soil erodibility factor. Theempirical functions constituting the model were derived from field and wind tunnelexperiments under a range of soil types and roughness conditions (e.g. Chepil and Woodruff,1954). WEQ uses a relationship between five generalised factors that account for the majorcontrols on wind erosion in cultivated environments. These factors are combined into fiveinputs for the model in the form:( I ', C',K',L'V )E = f,(3.1)71
- Page 44 and 45: Chapter 1 - IntroductionSimpson-Str
- Page 46 and 47: Chapter 1 - IntroductionDowns. Wind
- Page 48 and 49: Chapter 1 - IntroductionChapter 2 p
- Page 50 and 51: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 52 and 53: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 56 and 57: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 58 and 59: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 60 and 61: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 62 and 63: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 64 and 65: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 66 and 67: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 68 and 69: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 70 and 71: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 72 and 73: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 74 and 75: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 76 and 77: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 78 and 79: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 80 and 81: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 82 and 83: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 84 and 85: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 86 and 87: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 88 and 89: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 90 and 91: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 93: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 105 and 106: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 111 and 112: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 121: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 124 and 125: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 126 and 127: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 128 and 129: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 130 and 131: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 132 and 133: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 134 and 135: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 136 and 137: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 138 and 139: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 140 and 141: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 142 and 143: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
Chapter 3 – Modell<strong>in</strong>g Land Erodibility Reviewregional scale models. For the purposes of this discussion, regional scale modell<strong>in</strong>g isconsidered to be that where models are applied to areas ~10 4 km 2 , and operat<strong>in</strong>g overnumerous landscapes with<strong>in</strong> a region or cont<strong>in</strong>ent. The f<strong>in</strong>al group are the cont<strong>in</strong>ental toglobal scale models. These models operate at scales >10 4 km 2 , and are applied to simulateglobal scale dust dynamics.3.2 Field Scale <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong> ModelsThis section presents a review of field scale w<strong>in</strong>d erosion models. The models reviewed<strong>in</strong>clude the <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong> Equation (WEQ), Revised <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong> Equation (RWEQ), <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong><strong>Erosion</strong> Stochastic Simulator (WESS), <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong> Prediction System (WEPS), and Texas<strong>Erosion</strong> Analysis Model (TEAM). These models represent a range of approaches forassess<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>d erosion from farm fields at different spatial and temporal resolutions. The way<strong>in</strong> which land erodibility is quantified <strong>in</strong> each model is seen as a progression from earlyempirical research with limited comput<strong>in</strong>g capability, to more recent process-based studies.3.2.1 <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong> Equation (WEQ)The <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong> Equation (WEQ) was developed by Woodruff and Siddoway (1965) topredict annual soil erosion (kgha -1 ) from farm fields <strong>in</strong> the United States. WEQ was designedfor both the analysis and management of w<strong>in</strong>d erosion, with a central aim <strong>in</strong> its developmentbe<strong>in</strong>g to apply the model to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effects of field conditions and erosion mitigationstrategies on erosion rates.WEQ was developed from empirical relationships def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the effects of important w<strong>in</strong>derosion controls on soil loss rates. The foundation of WEQ is its soil erodibility factor. Theempirical functions constitut<strong>in</strong>g the model were derived from field and w<strong>in</strong>d tunnelexperiments under a range of soil types and roughness conditions (e.g. Chepil and Woodruff,1954). WEQ uses a relationship between five generalised factors that account for the majorcontrols on w<strong>in</strong>d erosion <strong>in</strong> cultivated environments. These factors are comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>to five<strong>in</strong>puts for the model <strong>in</strong> the form:( I ', C',K',L'V )E = f,(3.1)71