10.08.2015 Views

Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2 – Land Erodibility Controlsw<strong>in</strong>d erosion are <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the nature of the cover. In particular, if the cover is prostrate(flat), or stand<strong>in</strong>g (Leys, 1991a).A few approaches have been taken to quantify the effects of vegetation cover on w<strong>in</strong>derosion. These <strong>in</strong>clude: 1) studies to determ<strong>in</strong>e regression functions to describe therelationship between non-erodible roughness cover and erosion rates (soil loss); and 2)studies that seek to quantify the relationship between surface roughness and u *t .Prostrate non-erodible roughness elements reduce w<strong>in</strong>d erosion by three mechanisms (Hagen,1996). These <strong>in</strong>clude: 1) <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the static threshold at which entra<strong>in</strong>ment beg<strong>in</strong>s (u *t ); 2)restrict<strong>in</strong>g the w<strong>in</strong>d transport capacity by <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the dynamic threshold for saltation; and3) <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g the distance required to atta<strong>in</strong> transport capacity <strong>in</strong> short fields. In addition toprovid<strong>in</strong>g direct surface protection (cover), vegetation may trap creep<strong>in</strong>g, saltat<strong>in</strong>g orsuspended particles, thereby reduc<strong>in</strong>g total potential soil loss relative to bare erodiblesurfaces.Research <strong>in</strong>to the effects of prostrate vegetation cover has been dom<strong>in</strong>ated by w<strong>in</strong>d tunneland field scale (10 3 m 2 ) experiments <strong>in</strong> cultivated environments. Early research sought toestablish threshold cover levels for prostrate plant litter and stubble that could be used tocontrol w<strong>in</strong>d erosion <strong>in</strong> agricultural sett<strong>in</strong>gs. For example, Chepil (1944) used laboratoryw<strong>in</strong>d tunnel experimentation with straw residue. He found a negative exponential relationshipbetween surface residue (weight) and soil erosion rates (Q) for any given w<strong>in</strong>d velocity (U)and for a range of soil types. Siddoway et al. (1965) and Lyles and Allison (1981) foundsimilar relationships for Q with respect to various types, amounts and orientations (prostrateand stand<strong>in</strong>g) of stubble.Fryrear (1985) derived a negative exponential relationship between erosion rates (soil lossratio) and percentage soil cover. He def<strong>in</strong>ed the soil loss ratio (SLR) as the soil loss fromcovered soil to that of the soil <strong>in</strong> a bare condition, and relationships were determ<strong>in</strong>ed fordowel and wheat stubble elements and a range of soil textures:SLR( Fc)= exp(2.27)55

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!