Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia
Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One
Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 2 – Land Erodibility Controlsdisturbance, season, antecedent climatic conditions and the state of a crusted surface at thetime of disturbance are vital <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the level of crust degradation suffered with aparticular disturbance mechanism (Marble and Harper, 1989; Scarlett, 1994). Spatio-temporalvariability <strong>in</strong> climate and disturbance regimes leads to variable and spatially heterogeneousphysical and biological crust cover <strong>in</strong> many landscapes. Transitions between physical andbiological crust types may result from disturbance-recovery cycles, and this has implicationsw<strong>in</strong>d erosion processes (Strong, 2007).Soil crust characteristics that <strong>in</strong>fluence soil susceptibility to w<strong>in</strong>d erosion <strong>in</strong>clude cover,structure (arrangement of particles by gra<strong>in</strong> size), thickness, strength, and modulus of rupture(resistance to break<strong>in</strong>g by saltat<strong>in</strong>g particles). Spatial heterogeneity <strong>in</strong> these characteristics,comb<strong>in</strong>ed with disturbance mechanisms also affects the crust <strong>in</strong>fluence on w<strong>in</strong>d erosion.Crust Effects on <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong>Soil crusts reduce soil erodibility by b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g soil particles (lock<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong>to a non-erodiblesurface layer), reduc<strong>in</strong>g the availability of loose erodible sediment, and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g surfaceroughness. Thick surface crusts with a high modulus of rupture can provide a non-erodiblearmour over a surface.In general, an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> surface crust cover and strength results <strong>in</strong> an overall decrease <strong>in</strong> soilerodibility. Chepil (1942) reported that crusted soils may erode at a rate about one-sixth thatof non-crusted soils. This relationship was later determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be more complex. Leys andEldridge (1998) reported crust effects on w<strong>in</strong>d erosion under three levels of simulateddisturbance on a range of soil textures. They found that on the sandy soils, erosion rates werestatistically the same under the three disturbance levels; however, for the loamy soils therewas a significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> erosion rate with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g disturbance. Rajot et al. (2003)reported a 75% decrease <strong>in</strong> loose erodible particles on the soil surface due to crust formationfollow<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>. Various other studies have reported the effects of soil properties on crustformation and its effects on w<strong>in</strong>d erosion (e.g. Belnap and Gillette, 1997, 1998; Goosens,2004; Langston and McKenna-Neuman, 2005; Thomas and Dougill, 2007). In general thesestudies have exam<strong>in</strong>ed the effects of disturbance (i.e. by livestock or mechanical processes)on crust cover and erosion rates.52