10.08.2015 Views

Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2 – Land Erodibility Controlsdisturbance, season, antecedent climatic conditions and the state of a crusted surface at thetime of disturbance are vital <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g the level of crust degradation suffered with aparticular disturbance mechanism (Marble and Harper, 1989; Scarlett, 1994). Spatio-temporalvariability <strong>in</strong> climate and disturbance regimes leads to variable and spatially heterogeneousphysical and biological crust cover <strong>in</strong> many landscapes. Transitions between physical andbiological crust types may result from disturbance-recovery cycles, and this has implicationsw<strong>in</strong>d erosion processes (Strong, 2007).Soil crust characteristics that <strong>in</strong>fluence soil susceptibility to w<strong>in</strong>d erosion <strong>in</strong>clude cover,structure (arrangement of particles by gra<strong>in</strong> size), thickness, strength, and modulus of rupture(resistance to break<strong>in</strong>g by saltat<strong>in</strong>g particles). Spatial heterogeneity <strong>in</strong> these characteristics,comb<strong>in</strong>ed with disturbance mechanisms also affects the crust <strong>in</strong>fluence on w<strong>in</strong>d erosion.Crust Effects on <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong>Soil crusts reduce soil erodibility by b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g soil particles (lock<strong>in</strong>g them <strong>in</strong>to a non-erodiblesurface layer), reduc<strong>in</strong>g the availability of loose erodible sediment, and <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g surfaceroughness. Thick surface crusts with a high modulus of rupture can provide a non-erodiblearmour over a surface.In general, an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> surface crust cover and strength results <strong>in</strong> an overall decrease <strong>in</strong> soilerodibility. Chepil (1942) reported that crusted soils may erode at a rate about one-sixth thatof non-crusted soils. This relationship was later determ<strong>in</strong>ed to be more complex. Leys andEldridge (1998) reported crust effects on w<strong>in</strong>d erosion under three levels of simulateddisturbance on a range of soil textures. They found that on the sandy soils, erosion rates werestatistically the same under the three disturbance levels; however, for the loamy soils therewas a significant <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> erosion rate with <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g disturbance. Rajot et al. (2003)reported a 75% decrease <strong>in</strong> loose erodible particles on the soil surface due to crust formationfollow<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>. Various other studies have reported the effects of soil properties on crustformation and its effects on w<strong>in</strong>d erosion (e.g. Belnap and Gillette, 1997, 1998; Goosens,2004; Langston and McKenna-Neuman, 2005; Thomas and Dougill, 2007). In general thesestudies have exam<strong>in</strong>ed the effects of disturbance (i.e. by livestock or mechanical processes)on crust cover and erosion rates.52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!