10.08.2015 Views

Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2 – Land Erodibility ControlsHis expression described the wet threshold friction velocity <strong>in</strong> terms of the <strong>in</strong>fluence ofmoisture content on the dynamic (fluid) threshold friction velocity:[ 1.8 0.6log( w)]u* t= utw+ 100(2.15)Belly’s expression, however, was derived from a s<strong>in</strong>gle soil type, and did not account for theeffects of gra<strong>in</strong> size, shape or sort<strong>in</strong>g on the effect of moisture content. For this reason, themodel does not perform well <strong>in</strong> predict<strong>in</strong>g the effects of moisture content on u *t for soiltextures different to that used <strong>in</strong> the study.Bisal and Hsieh (1966) used a laboratory w<strong>in</strong>d tunnel to determ<strong>in</strong>e the effects of moisture onu *t for the entra<strong>in</strong>ment of f<strong>in</strong>e sandy loam, loam, and clay soils. They demonstrated thatsandy soils are least affected by moisture, while loamy and clay soils are more resistant tomobilisation when moist. This is due to the ability of the soils with higher clay content toreta<strong>in</strong> moisture and form aggregates that are less susceptible to mobilization than welldra<strong>in</strong>edsandy soils.Hotta et al. (1985) developed a l<strong>in</strong>ear expression to compute the wet threshold frictionvelocity based on the dry threshold and soil moisture content. Their expression was based onexperimental data for sands with gra<strong>in</strong> sizes rang<strong>in</strong>g form 0.2 to 0.8 mm, although theexpression does not account for soil gra<strong>in</strong> size:u= u 7. w(2.16)* tw * t+ 5where w is the water content <strong>in</strong> kg kg -1 and w < 0.08 kg kg -1 . Hotta et al. (1985) assumed amodel to describe the presence of soil moisture between soil particles, whereby moisture isconf<strong>in</strong>ed to wedges, which can be def<strong>in</strong>ed by the contact angle between gra<strong>in</strong>s. More recentresearch <strong>in</strong>to the effects of soil moisture on u *t have used or revised this model of moistureretention and gra<strong>in</strong> b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g to develop expressions for u *tw . Further research develop<strong>in</strong>gnumerical adjustments to u *t as a function of soil moisture have been reported as exponentialrelationships by Azzizov (1977), Hagen (1984), Shao et al. (1996) and Chen et al. (1996).45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!