10.08.2015 Views

Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 2 – Land Erodibility ControlsThe w<strong>in</strong>d erodibility <strong>in</strong>dex (Table 2.2) is a measure of the mass of sediment eroded from soilconta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g more than 60% dry aggregates (diameter >0.84 mm) relative to the soil conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gother portions of aggregates under the same conditions. A similar classification wasdeveloped by Leys (1991b) for <strong>Australia</strong>n soils <strong>in</strong> western New South Wales. The WEGs arefaithful to the def<strong>in</strong>ition of erodibility given by Houghton and Charman (1986).Two additional erodibility rank<strong>in</strong>g systems have been proposed that are of <strong>in</strong>terest here: the‘Lorikey’ and the Land Erodibility Index (LEI). These provide contrast<strong>in</strong>g approaches forassess<strong>in</strong>g and rank<strong>in</strong>g the susceptibility of soil and land areas to w<strong>in</strong>d erosion.Lorimer (1985) developed the ‘Lorikey’ to provide a method for assess<strong>in</strong>g the susceptibilityof soils and land to w<strong>in</strong>d erosion. The key extended early soil erodibility rank<strong>in</strong>g systems(Marshall, 1973; Kimberla<strong>in</strong> et al., 1977) and the WEGs. These systems were comb<strong>in</strong>ed withfactors quantify<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>d strength, site exposure (topography) and the frequency of erodiblew<strong>in</strong>ds, as well as soil surface condition, organic matter and texture. The Lorikey does nothave a measurable unit like the WEGs or the soil or field erodibility factors (Table 2.1). Likethe field erodibility <strong>in</strong>dex (K), the Lorikey allows for the assessment of land susceptibility tow<strong>in</strong>d erosion. However, the Lorikey does not <strong>in</strong>clude vegetation effects on w<strong>in</strong>d erosion.Application of the Lorikey is therefore restricted to bare (cultivated) agricultural regions.McTa<strong>in</strong>sh et al. (1999) developed a Land Erodibility Index (LEI). The LEI provides an<strong>in</strong>dication of the relative susceptibility of land types (e.g. downs, dunes and playa) to w<strong>in</strong>derosion, as well as temporal changes to these <strong>in</strong> response to climate variability. The LEI iscalculated as the dust flux (sediment flux at 0.5 to 2 m) divided by the cube of the mean w<strong>in</strong>dspeed above 6 ms -1 for the sampl<strong>in</strong>g period (monthly or annual). Unlike the soil erodibilityfactor, WEGs and the Lorikey, the LEI represents an historic account of w<strong>in</strong>d erosionprocesses and is responsive to changes <strong>in</strong> soil surface condition, moisture, vegetation coverand w<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>ess.2.1.1 Temporal Changes <strong>in</strong> Soil ErodibilitySoil erodibility is not constant but varies through time. Factors controll<strong>in</strong>g soil erodibility<strong>in</strong>clude texture, soil moisture and b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g agents (both m<strong>in</strong>eral and organic). Temporalvariations <strong>in</strong> soil erodibility are <strong>in</strong>fluenced by soil aggregation and crust<strong>in</strong>g which affect the29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!