Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia
Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One
Chapter 1 - Introductionsusceptibility of the rangelands to wind erosion is governed by complex relationshipsbetween soil types, vegetation cover and meteorological conditions, in particular rainfallquantities and timing (McTainsh et al., 1999). Subsequent studies sought to quantify changesin the erodibility of the claypan surface using remote sensing techniques (Chappell et al.,2003; Chappell et al., 2006; Chappell et al., 2007), and to quantify the effects of spatialvariations in dust source erodibility on emissions (Butler et al., 2005). Importantly, none ofthese studies sought to map spatial and temporal patterns in land susceptibility to winderosion at the landscape scale (10 3 km 2 ).Little research has been conducted in Australia to model the spatial distribution of winderosion. Lynch and Edwards (1980) used a pattern analysis approach for delineating winderosion zones in New South Wales. Their model defined nine zones within the state withvarying wind erosion hazards. The zones were aligned with the mean annual rainfall isohyets(increasing wind erosion risk with decreasing rainfall) and the pattern of dust-stormfrequencies reported by McTainsh et al. (1998). They could not, however, predict the preciselocation of areas with a wind erosion risk.Kalma et al. (1988) mapped potential wind erosion across Australia using an index of winderosivity (after Fryberger, 1978). They found that stream lines of airflow over Australiafollow an anti-cyclonic swirl about the centre of the continent. Variations in the flow occur inaccordance with seasonal changes in strength of the Zonal Westerlies and the Trade Windsover northern Australia. Maximum drift potential was found to occur in October, and reach aminimum in April. This result supported later studies which show these times to be roughlycoincident with periods of maximum and minimum wind erosion activity in central Australia(Eckström et al., 2004). The relative importance of seasonal variations in land erodibility indriving temporal changes in wind erosion activity remains yet to be considered in detail.Shao et al. (1994) and Shao et al. (1996) presented the first process-based model to assesswind erosion in the Murray-Darling Basin of south-eastern Australia. The model wassubsequently developed into an Integrated Wind Erosion Modelling System (IWEMS) forapplication on a national basis (Shao and Leslie, 1997; Lu and Shao, 2001). While the modelhas been used to simulate regional dust emissions, it has not been applied specifically toassess land susceptibility to wind erosion.10
Chapter 1 - IntroductionDespite a growing body of aeolian research in Australia, we are unable to describe whichareas of the country are susceptible to wind erosion at high spatial resolutions (e.g.
- Page 1: Modelling Land Susceptibility toWin
- Page 4: AUSLEM was developed as a Geographi
- Page 8 and 9: who joined me on many trips, shared
- Page 10 and 11: Conference Presentations by the Aut
- Page 12 and 13: 2.2.5 Soil Moisture Effects........
- Page 14 and 15: Chapter 6: Assessing Land Susceptib
- Page 16 and 17: List of FiguresChapter 1: Introduct
- Page 18 and 19: Figure 2.11 Conceptual model of lan
- Page 20 and 21: hand column) presents trajectories
- Page 22 and 23: List of TablesChapter 1: Introducti
- Page 24 and 25: xxii
- Page 26 and 27: Chapter 1 - Introduction• The abi
- Page 28 and 29: Chapter 1 - Introductionchapter the
- Page 30 and 31: Chapter 1 - Introductionevents yr -
- Page 32 and 33: Chapter 1 - IntroductionFigure 1.2
- Page 36 and 37: Chapter 1 - Introductiontemporal pa
- Page 38 and 39: Chapter 1 - Introduction1.5 Researc
- Page 40 and 41: Chapter 1 - IntroductionFigure 1.3
- Page 42 and 43: Chapter 1 - IntroductionMitchell Gr
- Page 44 and 45: Chapter 1 - IntroductionSimpson-Str
- Page 46 and 47: Chapter 1 - IntroductionDowns. Wind
- Page 48 and 49: Chapter 1 - IntroductionChapter 2 p
- Page 50 and 51: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 52 and 53: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 56 and 57: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 58 and 59: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 60 and 61: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 62 and 63: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 64 and 65: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 66 and 67: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 68 and 69: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 70 and 71: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 72 and 73: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 74 and 75: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 76 and 77: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 78 and 79: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 80 and 81: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 82 and 83: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
Chapter 1 - Introductionsusceptibility of the rangelands to w<strong>in</strong>d erosion is governed by complex relationshipsbetween soil types, vegetation cover and meteorological conditions, <strong>in</strong> particular ra<strong>in</strong>fallquantities and tim<strong>in</strong>g (McTa<strong>in</strong>sh et al., 1999). Subsequent studies sought to quantify changes<strong>in</strong> the erodibility of the claypan surface us<strong>in</strong>g remote sens<strong>in</strong>g techniques (Chappell et al.,2003; Chappell et al., 2006; Chappell et al., 2007), and to quantify the effects of spatialvariations <strong>in</strong> dust source erodibility on emissions (Butler et al., 2005). Importantly, none ofthese studies sought to map spatial and temporal patterns <strong>in</strong> land susceptibility to w<strong>in</strong>derosion at the landscape scale (10 3 km 2 ).Little research has been conducted <strong>in</strong> <strong>Australia</strong> to model the spatial distribution of w<strong>in</strong>derosion. Lynch and Edwards (1980) used a pattern analysis approach for del<strong>in</strong>eat<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>derosion zones <strong>in</strong> New South Wales. Their model def<strong>in</strong>ed n<strong>in</strong>e zones with<strong>in</strong> the state withvary<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>d erosion hazards. The zones were aligned with the mean annual ra<strong>in</strong>fall isohyets(<strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>d erosion risk with decreas<strong>in</strong>g ra<strong>in</strong>fall) and the pattern of dust-stormfrequencies reported by McTa<strong>in</strong>sh et al. (1998). They could not, however, predict the preciselocation of areas with a w<strong>in</strong>d erosion risk.Kalma et al. (1988) mapped potential w<strong>in</strong>d erosion across <strong>Australia</strong> us<strong>in</strong>g an <strong>in</strong>dex of w<strong>in</strong>derosivity (after Fryberger, 1978). They found that stream l<strong>in</strong>es of airflow over <strong>Australia</strong>follow an anti-cyclonic swirl about the centre of the cont<strong>in</strong>ent. Variations <strong>in</strong> the flow occur <strong>in</strong>accordance with seasonal changes <strong>in</strong> strength of the Zonal Westerlies and the Trade <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong>sover northern <strong>Australia</strong>. Maximum drift potential was found to occur <strong>in</strong> October, and reach am<strong>in</strong>imum <strong>in</strong> April. This result supported later studies which show these times to be roughlyco<strong>in</strong>cident with periods of maximum and m<strong>in</strong>imum w<strong>in</strong>d erosion activity <strong>in</strong> central <strong>Australia</strong>(Eckström et al., 2004). The relative importance of seasonal variations <strong>in</strong> land erodibility <strong>in</strong>driv<strong>in</strong>g temporal changes <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d erosion activity rema<strong>in</strong>s yet to be considered <strong>in</strong> detail.Shao et al. (1994) and Shao et al. (1996) presented the first process-based model to assessw<strong>in</strong>d erosion <strong>in</strong> the Murray-Darl<strong>in</strong>g Bas<strong>in</strong> of south-eastern <strong>Australia</strong>. The model wassubsequently developed <strong>in</strong>to an Integrated <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong> Modell<strong>in</strong>g System (IWEMS) forapplication on a national basis (Shao and Leslie, 1997; Lu and Shao, 2001). While the modelhas been used to simulate regional dust emissions, it has not been applied specifically toassess land susceptibility to w<strong>in</strong>d erosion.10