Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia
Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One
Chapter 6 – Field Assessments and Model Validationchanges in vegetation cover at the low end (0 – 15%) of the cover range. This means thatmodelled erodibility values increase slowly through the ‘no’, ‘low’ and ‘moderate’ classes,then rapidly into the ‘high’ erodibility class. The flat distribution of the data is explained bythe variability in predicted values for the high erodibility classes, which indicate that themodel has difficulty in representing land erodibility at the high end of the ranking.Secondly, data scaling issues affect the accuracies of the visual assessments and modelpredictions of land erodibility. Both are dependent on the arrangement of vegetation in thelandscape and are affected by its anisotropic distribution in semi-arid rangelands (Okin,2005). Assuming a uniform distribution of cover, the model has a tendency to under-estimateerodibility when input pixel vegetation cover values are high. Conversely, visual assessmentsof erodibility may account for vegetation patchiness, leading to relative over-estimates ofland erodibility. This issue is particularly relevant in the Mulga Lands (Windorah, Quilpiescenes), which are characterised by small erodible patches within a broader matrix of wellvegetatedland (Pickup, 1985). Future research to address this limitation should examine:implementing the validation at multiple spatial scales; accounting for vegetation distributionin the visual assessments of land erodibility; and including measures of vegetationdistribution in the model simulations (Okin and Gillette, 2001).6.5 ConclusionsThis chapter has demonstrated that acquiring visual assessments of land erodibility over largedistances using long-range transects can be a useful approach for monitoring landscapecondition and testing the performance of regional scale (>10 4 km 2 ) land erodibility models.Results suggest that AUSLEM performs better in the western Mitchell Grass Downs andChannel Country (Mt Dot, Cadell, Bedourie scenes) than in the Mulga Lands (Windorah,Quilpie scenes). To the knowledge of the author the long-range transect approach describedin this chapter has not previously been applied to test the performance of a wind erosionmodel. Further development and application of methods for assessing land erodibility at thelandscape scale will improve our capacity for monitoring and modelling land degradationprocesses in remote desert environments.166
Chapter 7 – Land Erodibility Dynamics 1980-2006Chapter 7Simulations of the Spatio-Temporal Aspects of LandErodibility in the North-East Lake Eyre Basin, Australia,1980 – 2006This chapter addresses Objectives 7 and 8. The chapter describes application of the landerodibility model to assess spatial and temporal patterns in land erodibility in westernQueensland from 1980 to 2006. The spatio-temporal dynamics are then related to climaticprocesses driving regional scale variations in the condition of the western Queenslandrangelands.7.1 IntroductionWind erosion and mineral dust emissions play important roles in land surface andatmospheric processes at local (
- Page 140 and 141: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 142 and 143: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 144 and 145: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 146 and 147: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 148 and 149: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 150 and 151: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 152 and 153: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 154 and 155: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 156 and 157: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 158 and 159: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 160 and 161: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 162 and 163: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 164 and 165: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 166 and 167: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 168 and 169: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 170 and 171: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 172 and 173: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 174 and 175: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 176 and 177: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 178 and 179: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 180 and 181: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 182 and 183: Chapter 6 - Field Assessments and M
- Page 184 and 185: Chapter 6 - Field Assessments and M
- Page 186 and 187: Chapter 6 - Field Assessments and M
- Page 188 and 189: Chapter 6 - Field Assessments and M
- Page 192 and 193: Chapter 7 - Land Erodibility Dynami
- Page 194 and 195: Chapter 7 - Land Erodibility Dynami
- Page 196 and 197: Chapter 7 - Land Erodibility Dynami
- Page 198 and 199: Chapter 7 - Land Erodibility Dynami
- Page 200 and 201: Chapter 7 - Land Erodibility Dynami
- Page 202 and 203: Chapter 7 - Land Erodibility Dynami
- Page 204 and 205: Chapter 7 - Land Erodibility Dynami
- Page 206 and 207: Chapter 7 - Land Erodibility Dynami
- Page 208 and 209: Chapter 7 - Land Erodibility Dynami
- Page 210 and 211: Chapter 7 - Land Erodibility Dynami
- Page 212 and 213: Chapter 7 - Land Erodibility Dynami
- Page 214 and 215: Chapter 8 - Conclusions• There is
- Page 216 and 217: Chapter 8 - ConclusionsThe third ai
- Page 218 and 219: Chapter 8 - Conclusionswas shown to
- Page 220 and 221: Chapter 8 - Conclusionsland use cha
- Page 222 and 223: Chapter 8 - Conclusionsmodels are n
- Page 224 and 225: Chapter 8 - Conclusionsmultiple ass
- Page 226 and 227: Chapter 8 - Conclusionsthe opportun
- Page 228 and 229: Beadle, N.C.W., 1945. Dust storms.
- Page 230 and 231: Bryan, R.B., Govers, G., Poesen, J.
- Page 232 and 233: Chepil, W.S., 1965. Transport of so
- Page 234 and 235: Fryrear, D.W., Sutherland, P.L., Da
- Page 236 and 237: Gregory, J.M., 1984. Prediction of
- Page 238 and 239: Hugenholtz, C.H., Wolfe, S.A., 2005
Chapter 7 – Land Erodibility Dynamics 1980-2006Chapter 7Simulations of the Spatio-Temporal Aspects of LandErodibility <strong>in</strong> the North-East Lake Eyre Bas<strong>in</strong>, <strong>Australia</strong>,1980 – 2006This chapter addresses Objectives 7 and 8. The chapter describes application of the landerodibility model to assess spatial and temporal patterns <strong>in</strong> land erodibility <strong>in</strong> western<strong>Queensland</strong> from 1980 to 2006. The spatio-temporal dynamics are then related to climaticprocesses driv<strong>in</strong>g regional scale variations <strong>in</strong> the condition of the western <strong>Queensland</strong>rangelands.7.1 Introduction<strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> erosion and m<strong>in</strong>eral dust emissions play important roles <strong>in</strong> land surface andatmospheric processes at local (