10.08.2015 Views

Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 2.11 Conceptual model of land erodibility, expressed as a function ofsurface roughness effects due to vegetation cover (top) and soilerodibility (bottom). Land erodibility is determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the relativeconditions of surface roughness and soil erodibility. In turn, thesecontrols are regulated by climate and land management conditions. ..............66Chapter 3: Approaches to Modell<strong>in</strong>g Land Erodibility to <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong>Figure 3.1 Space-time plot show<strong>in</strong>g the spatial and temporal scales of w<strong>in</strong>derosion models reviewed <strong>in</strong> this chapter. Light gray boxes representfield scale models (Section 3.2), white boxes represent regional scalemodels (Section 3.3), and dark gray boxes represent global scalemodels (Section 3.4) ........................................................................................70Chapter 4: A Framework for Modell<strong>in</strong>g Temporal Variations <strong>in</strong> SoilErodibilityFigure 4.1 Flow chart illustrat<strong>in</strong>g the relationships between soil erodibilitycontrols with<strong>in</strong> a landscape. Grey boxes represent environmentalconditions and processes that determ<strong>in</strong>e soil surface conditions and theimpact of disturbance mechanisms on the availability of loose erodiblematerial ..........................................................................................................100Figure 4.2 Graphs illustrat<strong>in</strong>g the effect of (a) chang<strong>in</strong>g the non-erodible fractionof a soil (%DA > 0.84 mm) on (b) the position of the curve def<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>gthe relationship between soil clay content (percentage clay) and soilerodibility as <strong>in</strong>dicated by the streamwise sediment flux (Q,represented by circles) at a w<strong>in</strong>d velocity of 65 kmh -1 (after Leys et al.,1996). .............................................................................................................107Figure 4.3 3D plot of the soil erodibility cont<strong>in</strong>uum as def<strong>in</strong>ed by the soilerodibility (<strong>in</strong>dicated by Q gm -1 s -1 ) relationship with soil clay content(percentage clay) and aggregate size distribution that controls thequantity of non-erodible soil aggregates (%DA > 0.84 mm).........................109Figure 4.4 A conceptual diagram of the movement of a soil through the erodibilitycont<strong>in</strong>uum from m<strong>in</strong>imum (Q m<strong>in</strong> ) to maximum (Q max ) erodibilitystates. The diagram <strong>in</strong>dicates three phases of movement: (i) acondition of m<strong>in</strong>imum erodibility, (ii) a transition phase of <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>gxvi

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!