10.08.2015 Views

Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5 – Land Erodibility Model DevelopmentSoil erodibility is governed by soil texture, but varies with changes <strong>in</strong> moisture, aggregationand surface crust<strong>in</strong>g (Zobeck, 1991; Merrill et al., 1999). These factors affect the strength ofcohesive forces between soil particles and the availability of loose erodible sediments on thesoil surface. Together these conditions act aga<strong>in</strong>st drag and lift forces associated with w<strong>in</strong>dshear. The effect of non-erodible elements like vegetation is through a partition<strong>in</strong>g of w<strong>in</strong>dshear stress between roughness elements and the soil surface, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong>roughness length and potential decrease <strong>in</strong> w<strong>in</strong>d erosivity (Marshall, 1971; Raupach et al.,1993). Factors controll<strong>in</strong>g land erodibility <strong>in</strong>clude those affect<strong>in</strong>g soil erodibility, land typecharacteristics (vegetation and geomorphology), climate (ra<strong>in</strong>fall, radiation balance,w<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>ess) and management (Figure 5.2). Where non-erodible roughness elements are absent,land erodibility is controlled by soil erodibility.The term land erodibility implies a relative susceptibility of land areas to w<strong>in</strong>d erosion.Factors controll<strong>in</strong>g soil and land erodibility operate at a range of spatial (local to global) andtemporal (seconds to years) scales. Climate variability and land management factors drivechanges <strong>in</strong> soil erodibility and surface roughness conditions with<strong>in</strong> a landscape. Thisvariability means that soil and land erodibility are spatio-temporally dynamic through acont<strong>in</strong>uum (Geeves et al., 2000; Chapter 2, Section 2.1).5.3.2 Rationale for Model DevelopmentWebb et al. (2006) reported the development of an <strong>Australia</strong>n Land Erodibility Model(AUSLEM) through the specification of a threshold-based rule-set. The rule-set def<strong>in</strong>esconditions under which the <strong>Australia</strong>n landscape may become susceptible to w<strong>in</strong>d erosion.AUSLEM assigns land erodibility rank<strong>in</strong>gs through the rule-set, which is applied to <strong>in</strong>puts ofsoil texture (sand, silt and clay content), and mean monthly grass cover (%), soil moisture(mm per 10 cm profile) and ra<strong>in</strong>fall (mm). The model is run us<strong>in</strong>g monthly-average 5 x 5 kmgridded <strong>in</strong>puts of grass cover, soil water content and ra<strong>in</strong>fall obta<strong>in</strong>ed from the AussieGRASS pasture growth model (Carter et al., 1996a) and Bureau of Meteorology. Soil textural<strong>in</strong>put data were acquired from the <strong>Australia</strong>n Natural Resources Atlas (see DEWHA, 2007).The model did not account for tree or stone cover effects on w<strong>in</strong>d erosion.Webb et al. (2006) applied AUSLEM to assess land erodibility on a national basis underrepresentative “wet”, “normal” and “dry” conditions. The model demonstrated an ability to134

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!