10.08.2015 Views

Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 4 –Modell<strong>in</strong>g Soil Erodibility DynamicsConsiderable research has been conducted exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g soil properties affect<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>d erosion(reviewed <strong>in</strong> Chapter 2). The piecemeal nature of much of the research, however, has meantthat it is difficult to <strong>in</strong>tegrate research f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs to build models of ‘big picture’ processes.This characteristic is a result of the complex response of soil aggregation and crust dynamicsto external drivers, and difficulties associated with extract<strong>in</strong>g mean<strong>in</strong>gful data on soilclimate-management<strong>in</strong>teractions (Merrill et al., 1997). In particular this affects our ability toparameterise models to predict temporal changes <strong>in</strong> soil erodibility.Table 4.1 summarises a selection of studies exam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g: a) soil aggregation changes <strong>in</strong>response to climate and management variability, b) soil crust disturbance effects on soilerodibility; and c) soil crust responses to trampl<strong>in</strong>g disturbance by livestock. Studiesexam<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g aeolian abrasion of crusts have not been <strong>in</strong>cluded as these perta<strong>in</strong> to the process oferosion and dust emission as opposed to the immediate erodibility of a soil surface. Bothqualitative and quantitative approaches have been used to exam<strong>in</strong>e temporal changes <strong>in</strong> soilerodibility, and passive monitor<strong>in</strong>g and active manipulation of sites have been used todeterm<strong>in</strong>e relationships between control and response variables.Historically, soil aggregation responses to climate variability have been studied <strong>in</strong> cultivatedregions where the economic and social consequences of severe w<strong>in</strong>d erosion are wellrecognised. The majority of these studies have been conducted <strong>in</strong> North America and havefocused on monitor<strong>in</strong>g seasonal responses of soils to freeze-thaw cycles and under cultivation(Bisal and Ferguson, 1968; Merrill et al., 1999; Bullock et al., 2001). Standard methods forreport<strong>in</strong>g on soil aggregation conditions, for example through aggregate size distributions,aggregate stability or the soil erodible fraction, have been adopted <strong>in</strong> many of these studies.This means that there is potential for compar<strong>in</strong>g results between studies on different soil,management or climate conditions and parameteris<strong>in</strong>g a generalised model of soil erodibilityresponse to climate, like that presented here. Few studies have used regression analyses to<strong>in</strong>tegrate relationships between factors controll<strong>in</strong>g soil aggregation <strong>in</strong> empirical models (e.g.Zobeck and Popham, 1990; Fryrear et al., 1994; Lόpez et al., 2007).122

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!