Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia
Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One
Chapter 4 –Modelling Soil Erodibility DynamicsWind tunnel experimentation has shown that sandy soils are typically highly erodible under arange of conditions. The model suggests that even on crusted sandy soils the availability ofloose erodible material will be sufficient to initiate saltation. This is supported by wind tunnelmeasurements of Q for crusted sandy soils (e.g. Belnap and Gillette, 1997). Soils with claycontent greater than 50% may experience a greater range of variability in susceptibility towind erosion (Chepil, 1954; Skidmore, 1994). This variability is driven by the temporalevolution of the surface particle size distribution and therefore loose erodible material thatresults from crust and aggregate formation and breakdown.4.4 Modelling Temporal Changes in Soil Erodibility4.4.1 ApproachTemporal changes in soil erodibility can be modelled by: 1) predicting soil aggregation levels(e.g. DASD or %DA >0.84 mm) then using that as input to Equation (4.5), or; 2) predictingthe lateral cover of surface crusts and using that as input to Equation (4.3), which can then beinput to Equation (4.5). These approaches are similar to those used in the WEPS model(Hagen, 2001; Visser et al., 2005; Chapter 3, Section 3.2.3). However, development andapplication of these approaches is restricted by the lack of quantitative data on factorscontrolling crust cover and dry aggregate size distributions in rangeland environments. Theapproach presented here seeks to characterise the form and rate of temporal changes in soilsurface conditions between the states of minimum and maximum erodibility.4.4.2 Temporal Model FrameworkFigure 4.1 illustrates the relationships between mechanisms controlling soil erodibility. Themechanisms can be placed into three groups. The first group includes climatic factors that inthe first instance may act in reducing soil erodibility. The dominant factor in this group israinfall, the effects of which are moderated by solar radiation intensity, air temperature,evaporation rates and windiness. The second group are related to management, and includefactors that may increase the susceptibility of a soil to wind erosion. In rangelandenvironments the dominant factor in this group is the stocking rate (animals per unit area)which drives disturbance (trampling) intensity and crust/aggregate breakdown. Climatic110
Chapter 4 –Modelling Soil Erodibility Dynamicsfactors may also play a significant role in soil aggregate destruction, for example drivingphoto-degradation of biological crusts and through freeze-thaw process. The third groupinclude soil textural properties and cohesion agents. This group is influenced by the climateand management conditions, but also contains factors that are particular to specific soil types,e.g. moisture holding capacity. Movement of a soil through the erodibility continuum can bemodelled through an expression of the behaviour of the soil in response to these forcingmechanisms (Chapter 2, Section 2.4).Figure 4.4 illustrates the movement of a soil through the erodibility continuum. Themovement can be considered to follow three phases, labelled i, ii and iii. The mechanismscontrolling the position of a soil within the continuum will vary for each phase.The first phase (i) defines a condition of minimum erodibility. Sufficient rainfall to inducesoil surface sealing will result in a breakdown of dry aggregates and the consolidation ofsurface material in a saturated matrix (Kemper et al., 1987, Maulem et al., 1990). At thispoint reorganisation of the grains may take place, forming structural or depositional crustsand potentially rejuvenating biological crust growth (Valentin and Bresson, 1992). In termsof the erodibility continuum defined by Equation (4.4), this phase positions a soil at Q min ,defined by b min , and controlled primarily by climatic factors (Figure 4.1). At the cessation ofrainfall the control on erodibility will shift to being dominated by soil moisture, and the soilwill remain at around the position of Q min until the moisture content lowers to a positiondefined by Fécan et al. (1999) as w’, the minimum moisture content required to induce anincrease in u *t . Here the soil textural properties become important. Erodibility will remainconstant during phase (i) for soils that seal and form physical crusts. For sandy soils anincrease in erodibility will occur during this phase. This increase in erodibility can beexpressed by a power function that defines a decrease in the ratio of u *tw for the wet soil tou *td for the soil in a dry condition with decreasing soil moisture content (Fécan et al., 1999).The period of time that a soil remains in this phase is therefore determined by its physicalproperties and cohesion agents; this is likely to be shorter for well drained sandy soils thanfor soils with higher clay content that have higher water holding capacity (Cornelis andGabriels, 2003).111
- Page 84 and 85: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 86 and 87: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 88 and 89: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 90 and 91: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 103 and 104: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 105 and 106: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 111 and 112: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 121: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 124 and 125: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 126 and 127: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 128 and 129: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 130 and 131: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 132 and 133: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 136 and 137: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 138 and 139: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 140 and 141: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 142 and 143: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 144 and 145: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 146 and 147: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 148 and 149: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 150 and 151: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 152 and 153: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 154 and 155: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 156 and 157: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 158 and 159: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 160 and 161: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 162 and 163: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 164 and 165: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 166 and 167: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 168 and 169: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 170 and 171: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 172 and 173: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 174 and 175: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 176 and 177: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 178 and 179: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 180 and 181: Chapter 5 - Land Erodibility Model
- Page 182 and 183: Chapter 6 - Field Assessments and M
Chapter 4 –Modell<strong>in</strong>g Soil Erodibility Dynamicsfactors may also play a significant role <strong>in</strong> soil aggregate destruction, for example driv<strong>in</strong>gphoto-degradation of biological crusts and through freeze-thaw process. The third group<strong>in</strong>clude soil textural properties and cohesion agents. This group is <strong>in</strong>fluenced by the climateand management conditions, but also conta<strong>in</strong>s factors that are particular to specific soil types,e.g. moisture hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity. Movement of a soil through the erodibility cont<strong>in</strong>uum can bemodelled through an expression of the behaviour of the soil <strong>in</strong> response to these forc<strong>in</strong>gmechanisms (Chapter 2, Section 2.4).Figure 4.4 illustrates the movement of a soil through the erodibility cont<strong>in</strong>uum. Themovement can be considered to follow three phases, labelled i, ii and iii. The mechanismscontroll<strong>in</strong>g the position of a soil with<strong>in</strong> the cont<strong>in</strong>uum will vary for each phase.The first phase (i) def<strong>in</strong>es a condition of m<strong>in</strong>imum erodibility. Sufficient ra<strong>in</strong>fall to <strong>in</strong>ducesoil surface seal<strong>in</strong>g will result <strong>in</strong> a breakdown of dry aggregates and the consolidation ofsurface material <strong>in</strong> a saturated matrix (Kemper et al., 1987, Maulem et al., 1990). At thispo<strong>in</strong>t reorganisation of the gra<strong>in</strong>s may take place, form<strong>in</strong>g structural or depositional crustsand potentially rejuvenat<strong>in</strong>g biological crust growth (Valent<strong>in</strong> and Bresson, 1992). In termsof the erodibility cont<strong>in</strong>uum def<strong>in</strong>ed by Equation (4.4), this phase positions a soil at Q m<strong>in</strong> ,def<strong>in</strong>ed by b m<strong>in</strong> , and controlled primarily by climatic factors (Figure 4.1). At the cessation ofra<strong>in</strong>fall the control on erodibility will shift to be<strong>in</strong>g dom<strong>in</strong>ated by soil moisture, and the soilwill rema<strong>in</strong> at around the position of Q m<strong>in</strong> until the moisture content lowers to a positiondef<strong>in</strong>ed by Fécan et al. (1999) as w’, the m<strong>in</strong>imum moisture content required to <strong>in</strong>duce an<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> u *t . Here the soil textural properties become important. Erodibility will rema<strong>in</strong>constant dur<strong>in</strong>g phase (i) for soils that seal and form physical crusts. For sandy soils an<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> erodibility will occur dur<strong>in</strong>g this phase. This <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> erodibility can beexpressed by a power function that def<strong>in</strong>es a decrease <strong>in</strong> the ratio of u *tw for the wet soil tou *td for the soil <strong>in</strong> a dry condition with decreas<strong>in</strong>g soil moisture content (Fécan et al., 1999).The period of time that a soil rema<strong>in</strong>s <strong>in</strong> this phase is therefore determ<strong>in</strong>ed by its physicalproperties and cohesion agents; this is likely to be shorter for well dra<strong>in</strong>ed sandy soils thanfor soils with higher clay content that have higher water hold<strong>in</strong>g capacity (Cornelis andGabriels, 2003).111