Wind Erosion in Western Queensland Australia
Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One Modelling Land Susceptibility to Wind Erosion in Western ... - Ninti One
Chapter 3 – Modelling Land Erodibility Review3.2.5 Wind Erosion Stochastic Simulator (WESS)The Wind Erosion Stochastic Simulator (WESS) is the wind erosion module of the EPIC(Environmental Policy Integrated Climate) erosion model (Van Pelt et al., 2004). WESS is aprocess-based model that predicts wind erosion on an event or periodic basis. The modelprovides assessments of soil loss at user-specified distances within individual fields. Themodel uses inputs of soil surface data including texture, soil surface moisture and drying rate,erodible soil thickness, surface soil bulk density, and soil roughness parameters for largeaggregates (random roughness), and ridge height and spacing (oriented roughness). This iscoupled with local wind speed data and a stochastic wind speed perturbation factor tosimulate dust emission (Potter et al., 1998). WESS simulates wind erosion based on dailywind speed distributions adjusted by soil, surface roughness, vegetation cover and erodingfield length factors:YW= ( FI )( FR)( FV )( FD)!t0YWRdtWL(3.14)where YW is the wind erosion estimate (kgm -2 ), YWR is the erosion rate (kgm -1 s -1 ), WL is theunsheltered field length (m), FI is the soil erodibility factor, FR is the surface roughnessfactor, FV is the vegetation cover factor, FD is the field length factor (based on WL), and t isthe duration of wind greater than a threshold velocity. YWR is calculated using the approachof Skidmore (1986). The soil erodibility adjustment factor is based on the static WindErodibility Groups (WEGs) reported by Woodruff and Siddoway (1965), and used in theWEQ model:( 0.0001 )IFI = *exp * YW695(3.15)where I is the soil erodibility factor (tha -1 ) with values assigned by soil texture and theWEGs. The effect of oriented surface (cultivated ridge) roughness (FR) is calculated as afunction of wind direction, and the impact angles of saltating grains:RFC FR = 1 exp (3.16) RFB 80
Chapter 3 – Modelling Land Erodibility Reviewwhere α is the saltating grain impact angle (~15°), RFB is based on the cultivated ridgeheight, wind direction and random roughness, and RFC varies with ridge height. Thevegetation factor is computed as a function of modelled vegetation cover:FV= VEVE + exp (3.17)( 0.48 1.32VE)where VE is the vegetation cover factor (tha -1 ). Both the soil and vegetation cover factors arescaled between 0 and 1. The field length (distance, FD) factor is modelled as a function of thefield length in the prevailing wind direction.Potter et al. (1998) described a comparison of WESS erosion simulations with measurederosion events in Alberta, Canada. Simulated erosion events corresponded to most of themeasured wind erosion activity; however, the model was found to overestimate erosion forone event in seven, and occasionally predicted events when no erosion was measured. Poormodel performance in these circumstances was attributed to the simplified nature of themodelling scheme, and the lack of a scheme to account for temporal changes in soil surfaceconditions such as crusting and the erodible fraction.3.3 Local to Regional Scale ModelsThis section examines process-based regional scale wind erosion models. The modelsreviewed include the Wind Erosion on European Light Soils (WEELS) model, Wind ErosionAssessment Model (WEAM), and the Integrated Wind Erosion Modelling System (IWEMS).3.3.1 Wind Erosion on European Light Soils (WEELS)The Wind Erosion on European Light Soils (WEELS) model was developed to map winderosion risk and to predict long-term wind-induced soil loss under different climate and landuse scenarios (Böhner et al., 2003). The model was developed from the EROKLI model(Beinhauer and Kruse, 1994) and can be run at local scales in domains up to 5 x 5 km in size,using input data at a 25 x 25 m resolution. WEELS has a modular structure, and is run in aGeographic Information System (GIS) environment.81
- Page 54 and 55: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 56 and 57: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 58 and 59: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 60 and 61: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 62 and 63: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 64 and 65: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 66 and 67: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 68 and 69: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 70 and 71: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 72 and 73: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 74 and 75: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 76 and 77: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 78 and 79: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 80 and 81: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 82 and 83: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 84 and 85: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 86 and 87: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 88 and 89: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 90 and 91: Chapter 2 - Land Erodibility Contro
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 95 and 96: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 97 and 98: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 99 and 100: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 101 and 102: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 103: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 107 and 108: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 109 and 110: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 111 and 112: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 113 and 114: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 115 and 116: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 117 and 118: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 119 and 120: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 121: Chapter 3 - Modelling Land Erodibil
- Page 124 and 125: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 126 and 127: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 128 and 129: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 130 and 131: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 132 and 133: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 134 and 135: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 136 and 137: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 138 and 139: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 140 and 141: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 142 and 143: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 144 and 145: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 146 and 147: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 148 and 149: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 150 and 151: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
- Page 152 and 153: Chapter 4 -Modelling Soil Erodibili
Chapter 3 – Modell<strong>in</strong>g Land Erodibility Reviewwhere α is the saltat<strong>in</strong>g gra<strong>in</strong> impact angle (~15°), RFB is based on the cultivated ridgeheight, w<strong>in</strong>d direction and random roughness, and RFC varies with ridge height. Thevegetation factor is computed as a function of modelled vegetation cover:FV= VEVE + exp (3.17)( 0.48 1.32VE)where VE is the vegetation cover factor (tha -1 ). Both the soil and vegetation cover factors arescaled between 0 and 1. The field length (distance, FD) factor is modelled as a function of thefield length <strong>in</strong> the prevail<strong>in</strong>g w<strong>in</strong>d direction.Potter et al. (1998) described a comparison of WESS erosion simulations with measurederosion events <strong>in</strong> Alberta, Canada. Simulated erosion events corresponded to most of themeasured w<strong>in</strong>d erosion activity; however, the model was found to overestimate erosion forone event <strong>in</strong> seven, and occasionally predicted events when no erosion was measured. Poormodel performance <strong>in</strong> these circumstances was attributed to the simplified nature of themodell<strong>in</strong>g scheme, and the lack of a scheme to account for temporal changes <strong>in</strong> soil surfaceconditions such as crust<strong>in</strong>g and the erodible fraction.3.3 Local to Regional Scale ModelsThis section exam<strong>in</strong>es process-based regional scale w<strong>in</strong>d erosion models. The modelsreviewed <strong>in</strong>clude the <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong> on European Light Soils (WEELS) model, <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong>Assessment Model (WEAM), and the Integrated <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong> Modell<strong>in</strong>g System (IWEMS).3.3.1 <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong> on European Light Soils (WEELS)The <strong>W<strong>in</strong>d</strong> <strong>Erosion</strong> on European Light Soils (WEELS) model was developed to map w<strong>in</strong>derosion risk and to predict long-term w<strong>in</strong>d-<strong>in</strong>duced soil loss under different climate and landuse scenarios (Böhner et al., 2003). The model was developed from the EROKLI model(Be<strong>in</strong>hauer and Kruse, 1994) and can be run at local scales <strong>in</strong> doma<strong>in</strong>s up to 5 x 5 km <strong>in</strong> size,us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>put data at a 25 x 25 m resolution. WEELS has a modular structure, and is run <strong>in</strong> aGeographic Information System (GIS) environment.81