05.12.2012 Views

PC Magazine - 2009 04.pdf - Libertad Zero - Blog

PC Magazine - 2009 04.pdf - Libertad Zero - Blog

PC Magazine - 2009 04.pdf - Libertad Zero - Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

About a year ago, <strong>PC</strong>Mag.com’s networking<br />

analyst walked into my office, put a<br />

small plastic box on my desk, and told me<br />

that we had a new Editors’ Choice for VoIP<br />

solutions: the YMax magicJack. The value<br />

proposition was obvious: clear calls anywhere<br />

in the U.S., dead-simple operation,<br />

and, best of all, the box cost only $40 (plus<br />

another $20 a year for service). Sure, it<br />

sounded too good to be true, but after a lot<br />

of testing, we found that the product actually<br />

worked as advertised. Fast-forward a<br />

year, and even though the magicJack’s network<br />

and firmware have been upgraded,<br />

our opinion of the product is considerably<br />

lower. The magicJack’s story should serve<br />

as a cautionary tale for the entire technology<br />

industry.<br />

Truth be told, we started getting complaints<br />

about the magicJack as soon as<br />

we published our review. Not just a few<br />

unhappy users, but dozens of them. There<br />

were also plenty of poor Better Business<br />

Bureau reports. Turns out the primary<br />

problem isn’t with the product itself—it’s<br />

with the company’s technical support. And<br />

for many would-be buyers, the issues that<br />

are coming to light are deal breakers.<br />

My colleague Sascha Segan has already<br />

written about the limits of professional<br />

product reviews in his column. Reviewers<br />

have products for only a short period<br />

of time before they send them back to the<br />

vendors. This makes it impossible either<br />

to perform long-term testing or to evaluate<br />

build quality across an entire product line.<br />

In the case of the magicJack, however, we<br />

tested four different units over the course<br />

of a year. Every time we came to the same<br />

DAN COSTA<br />

The Case of magicJack<br />

conclusion: When it works, it’s great; when<br />

it doesn’t, you shouldn’t expect much help<br />

from the company.<br />

YMax has been very busy since the<br />

launch of magicJack in 2007. The company’s<br />

aggressive marketing efforts have<br />

put its product in the hands of pretty much<br />

every technology journalist I know, and<br />

the resulting reviews have generally been<br />

quite positive. YMax has also blanketed<br />

late-night cable TV with ads—stay up<br />

past 1 a.m. and there’s a good chance you’ll<br />

see a goofy infomercial for the magicJack.<br />

The company even placed units into a<br />

recent TED conference goody bag and<br />

We tested four different magicJack units, and every<br />

time we came to the same conclusion: When it works,<br />

it’s great. When it doesn’t, don’t expect much help.<br />

got its own football game: the magicJack<br />

St. Petersburg Bowl.<br />

All this press has been a boon for<br />

YMax. All told, the company estimates it<br />

has sold more than two million magicJacks<br />

since the product launched, and it’s now<br />

selling them at a rate of 250,000 a month.<br />

At $40 a pop, plus annual revenues of $20 a<br />

year, that’s a lot of cash rolling in. This also<br />

means an enormous user base that needs<br />

billing, technical, and customer support<br />

services. This is where YMax, like many<br />

start-ups, comes up woefully short. YMax<br />

simply doesn’t answer phone calls. The<br />

company doesn’t list a corporate number<br />

anywhere on its Web site and offers no live<br />

voice support, only live chat. And even live<br />

chat is accessible only after you’ve been<br />

repeatedly dumped into the site’s knowledge<br />

base. Although the product often “just<br />

works,” when it doesn’t, you’re in trouble:<br />

Live chat is not an ideal medium for helping<br />

a user adjust UDP ports or reconfigure<br />

firewall settings.<br />

YMax CEO Dan Borislow stopped<br />

by our offices a couple of months ago to<br />

talk about how the company has grown<br />

and what it’s doing to improve customer<br />

support. He even let me peek into its<br />

chat-based support infrastructure, which<br />

consists of real-time instant messaging<br />

with service reps in the Philippines, who<br />

are always on call and are graded based<br />

on their performance. The system looks<br />

pretty impressive.<br />

In our real-world testing, however, the<br />

live chat reps were not helpful. Worse,<br />

we were directed to make changes to our<br />

system Registry to solve routine networking<br />

problems. As tech journalists, we can<br />

handle that, but for the average user this is<br />

a recipe for disaster.<br />

It’s a mistake to think of YMax as only<br />

a company that hawks a $40 adapter on<br />

late-night TV. YMax is a phone company,<br />

and a pretty big one. Yes, it uses VoIP, but<br />

its business model is very different from<br />

those of Vonage and other cable operators<br />

that offer phone service. The magic-<br />

Jack service has a nationwide network<br />

of media gateways and session border<br />

controllers, as well as CLEC (competitive<br />

local exchange carrier) certifications<br />

in all 50 states. YMax is a huge company<br />

with a vast technical architecture to support.<br />

Unfortunately, it doesn’t seem to be<br />

spending enough to take care of that customer<br />

base.<br />

Sure, managing the explosive growth<br />

that YMax has experienced in the past year<br />

would tax any company. But YMax seems<br />

to have lost track of its purpose. It isn’t just<br />

selling an inexpensive gadget, it’s selling a<br />

service. And providing a service requires<br />

more than simply placing calls. Sometimes<br />

it requires taking them.<br />

What’s your experience with the<br />

magicJack? We’ve set up a comments section<br />

on Gearlog. Click here.<br />

TALK bAcK To DAn E-mail your thoughts<br />

to dan_costa@ziffdavis.com.<br />

APRIL <strong>2009</strong> <strong>PC</strong> MAGAZINE DIGITAL EDITION 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!