Isis Current Bibliography 2006, Vol. 97 - History of Science Society

C. Thematic Approaches to the Study of Science
20. GENERAL WORKS ON SCIENCE AND
ITS INTERACTION WITH SOCIETY AND
CULTURE
212. FARA, Patricia. “Scientific Coats of Arms.”
Endeavour 29 (2005): 101–103.
On the creation of coats of arms with often humorous scientific
imagery.
213. HOMMELS, Anique. “STS and the City.” Soc.
Stud. Sci. 33 (2003): 945–950.
Essay review of BINGAMAN et al. . [ref. 620]; Peter MAD-
SEN and Richard PLUNZ (eds.), The Urban Lifeworld (2002).
214. KOLCHINSKY, E. ˙J. (Ed.) Science and Crises:
Historical-Comparative Issues. [Translated title.] In
Russian. (1040 pp.; index.) Saint-Petersburg: Dmitry
Bulanin, 2003. ISBN: 5860073143.
Concerns science and society relationships from the English
revolution of the 17th century to the Chinese cultural
revolution of the 20th century.
215. TURNER, Stephen. “The Third Science War.”
Soc. Stud. Sci. 33 (2003): 581–611.
Essay review of James BROWN, Who Rules in Science (2001);
Philip KITCHER, Science, Truth and Democracy (2001).
21. SCIENCE AND ETHICS
216. BEAUFAYS, Joseph-Paul. “L’animal au service
de l’homme ?” Dossier thématique: Les méthodes alternatives
à l’expérimentation animale: choix éthique
et meilleure science? Rev. Quest. Sci. 176 (2005):
223–228.
Partial contents: Jean-Marie GIFFROY and Joseph-Paul
BEAUFAYS, “Évolution des relations homme-animal,”
275–288; Bénédicte SCHILS, “Bref aspect historique de
l’enrôlement de l’animal dans la recherche scientifique,”
289–303; Jean BELOT, “L’expérimentation animale dans les
laboratoires belges en 2004,” 304-310; Joseph-Paul BEA-
UFAYS, “L’éthique : un défi pour la recherche,” 313–322;
Laura SPANO et al, “La souris dans nos laboratoires : entre
anthropocentrisme et biocentrisme,” 323–339; Joseph-Paul
BEAUFAYS, “Les alternatives à l’expérimentation animale : le
concept des 3 ‘R’ de Russell et Burch,” 343–353; Joseph-Paul
BEAUFAYS, “Évolution paradigmatique de la pensée dans la
construction noétique des sciences du vivant,” 354–364.
217. FRANKLIN, Julian H. Animal Rights and Moral
Philosophy. (xix + 151 pp.; bibl.; index.) New York:
Columbia Univ. Press, 2005. ISBN: 0231134223.
218. ISRAEL, Giorgio. “Scienza pura e applicata
nell’ultimo trentennio: una trasformazione radicale.”
Llull 26 (2003): 859–888.
On the limits of the technological applications of science and
the relationships between technoscience and ethics.
219. LEWENS, Tim. “Introduction: Is Something
Wrong with Bioethics?” Special Issue: The Ethics
of Bioethics. Stud. Hist. Phil. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 35
(2004): 121–123.
ELLIOTT [ref. 613]; Hallvard LILLEHAMMER, “Who Needs
Bioethicists?” 131–144; Tim LEWENS, “The Commercial
Exploitation of Ethics,” 145–153; Richard E. ASHCROFT,
“Bioethics and Conflicts of Interest,” 155-165; John MCMIL-
LAN, “Is Corporate Money Bad for Bioethics?” 167-175.
220. MCGUIRE, Amy L. “Respect for Research
Subjects: Reality or Rhetoric?” Diss. Abstr. Int. A
65/12 (2005): 4697.
Dissertation at the University of Texas Graduate School of
Biomedical Sciences at Galveston, 2004. Adviser: Winslade,
William J. UMI pub. no. 3159410. 253 pp.
221. TSOVEL, Ariel. “The Untold Story of a Chicken
and the Missing Knowledge in Interspecific Ethics.”
Sci. Context 19 (2006): 237–267.
22. SCIENCE AND POLITICS, LAW, AND
ECONOMICS
222. ASHWORTH, William J. Customs and Excise:
Trade, Production, and Consumption in England,
1640–1845. (xii + 396 pp.; bibl.; index.) Oxford:
Oxford Univ. Press, 2003. ISBN: 0199259216.
223. BERKOWITZ, Roger Stuart. The Gift of Science:
Leibniz and the Modern Legal Tradition. (xviii + 214
pp.; bibl.; index.) Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ.
Press, 2005. ISBN: 0674018737.
224. CASTREE, Noel. “A Congress of the World.”
Sci. Cult. 15 (2006): 159–170.
Essay review of LATOUR [ref. 231].
225. GEUNA, Aldo. “The Economics of Science:
Good Old Wine in a New Bottle.” Soc. Stud. Sci. 33
(2003): 458–461.
Essay review of Philip MIROWSKI and Esther-Mirjam SENT
(eds.), Science Bought and Sold (2002).
226. GRANDIN, Karl, Nina WORMBS, and Sven
WIDMALM. (Eds.) The Science-Industry Nexus:
History, Policy, Implications. Nobel Symposium
123. (xvii + 457 pp.; ill.; index.) Sagamore Beach,
Maine: Science History Publications/USA, 2005.
ISBN: 0881353655.
Contents: Nina WORMBS, Karl GRANDIN and Sven WID-
MALM, “Introduction: From the Linear Model to the Triple
Helix and Beyond,” ix-xvii; Glen R. ASNER, “The Linear
Model, the U. S. Department of Defense, and the Golden
Age of Industrial Research,” 3-30; David EDGERTON, “ ‘The
Linear Model’ Did not Exist: Reflections on the History and
Historiography of Science and Research in Industry in the
Twentieth Century,” 31-57; David A. HOUNSHELL, “Industrial
Research: Commentary,” 59-65; Henry ETZKOWITZ,
“The Triple Helix and the Rise of the Entrepreneurial University,”
69-91; Alexandra WALUSZEWSKI, “How Social
Science Is Colored by Its Research Tools or What’s Behind
the Different Interpretations of a Growing ‘Biotech
Valley’?” 93-118; Keith PAVITT, “Changing Patterns of Usefulness
of University Research: Opportunities and Dangers,”
119-131; John KRIGE, “The Industrialization of Research: