Isis Current Bibliography 2006, Vol. 97 - History of Science Society

10 11. Sociology & psychology of science
181. FRASER, Mariam. “The Ethics of Reality and
Virtual Reality: Latour, Facts and Values.” Hist. Hum.
Sci. 19, no. 2 (2006): 45–72.
182. FROHMANN, Bernd Peter. Deflating Information:
From Science Studies to Documentation. (x +
311 pp.; bibl.; index.) Toronto: Univ. of Toronto
Press, 2004. ISBN: 0802088392.
Theoretical work on the epistemology of scientific documentation.
183. FULLER, Steve. The Philosophy of Science and
Technology Studies. (ix + 191 pp.; bibl.; index.) New
York: Routledge, 2006. ISBN: 0415941040.
184. GANE, Nicholas. (Ed.) The Future of Social
Theory. (xii + 210 pp.; bibl.; index.) London/New
York: Continuum, 2004. ISBN: 0826470653.
Contains an interview with Bruno Latour, and includes
discussion of topics such as the transformation of society
with the rise of new technology, society as a gendered idea,
and society as a product of Empire. Reviews: [ref. R329]
185. GARFIELD, Eugene. “The Unintended and
Unanticipated Consequences of Robert K. Merton.”
Soc. Stud. Sci. 34 (2004): 845–853.
186. GIERE, Ronald N., and Barton MOFFATT. “Distributed
Cognition: Where the Cognitive and the
Social Merge.” Soc. Stud. Sci. 33 (2003): 301–310.
187. GROSZ, Elizabeth A. Time Travels: Feminism,
Nature, Power. Next Wave. Durham: Duke Univ.
Press, 2005. ISBN: 0822335530.
On how various imagined relations in time “alters understandings
of social and scientific projects ranging from theories of
justice to evolutionary biology.” (from the publisher)
188. HILGARTNER, Stephen. “Reply: The Credibility
of Science on Stage.” Soc. Stud. Sci. 34 (2004):
443–452.
Essay review of Stephen HILGARTNER, Science on Stage
(2000).
189. JASANOFF, Sheila. “Breaking the Waves in
Science Studies: Comment on H. M. Collins and
Robert Evans, ‘The Third Wave of Science Studies.’ ”
Symposium. Soc. Stud. Sci. 33 (2003): 389–400.
Symposium in response to COLLINS and EVANS [ref. 178].
Contents: Brian WYNNE, “Seasick on the Third Wave?
Subverting the Hegemony of Propositionalism: Response to
Collins & Evans (2002),” 401–417; Arie RIP, “Constructing
Expertise: In a Third Wave of Science Studies?” 419–434;
Robert EVANS and H. M. COLLINS, “King Canute Meets the
Beach Boys: Responses to the Third Wave,” 435–452.
190. KLEIN, Ursula. “Introduction: Technoscientic
Productivity.” Introduction to a special theme issue.
Perspect. Sci. 13 (2005): 139–142.
Contents: Barry BARNES, “Elusive Memories of Technoscience,”
142–165; FREUDENTHAL [ref. 1342]; Wolfgang
LEFÈVRE, “Science as Labor,” 194–225; KLEIN [ref. 2174];
John PICKSTONE, “On Knowing, Acting, and the Location
of Technoscience: A Response to Barry Barnes,” 267–278;
David BLOOR, “Toward a Sociology of Epistemic Things,”
285–312; Hans-Jörg RHEINBERGER, “Gaston Bachelard and
the Notion of ‘Phenomenotechnique’ ,” 313-328; HARWOOD
[ref. 2629]; PICKERING [ref. 2180]; Hans-Jörg RHEIN-
BERGER, “A Reply to David Bloor: ‘Toward a Sociology of
Epistemic Things’ ,” 406–410; Jonathan HARWOOD, “Comments
on Andrew Pickering’s Paper,” 411–415; Andrew
PICKERING, “From Dyes to Iraq: A Reply to Jonathan
Harwoood,” 416–425.
191. KUSCH, Martin. “Rule-Scepticism and the
Sociology of Scientific Knowledge: The Bloor-Lynch
Debate Revisited.” Soc. Stud. Sci. 34 (2004): 571–
591.
Responses to this article: David BLOOR, “Institutions and
Rule-Scepticism: A Reply to Martin Kusch,” 593–601; Wes
SHARROCK, “No Case to Answer: A Response to Martin
Kusch’s ‘Rule-Scepticism and the Sociology of Scientific
Knowledge’ ,” 603–614; Martin KUSCH, “Reply to my
Critics,” 615–620.
192. LYNCH, Michael, and Simon COLE. “Science
and Technology Studies on Trial: Dilemmas of Expertise.”
Soc. Stud. Sci. 35 (2005): 269–311.
193. MIALET, Hélène. “The ‘Righteous Wrath’ of
Pierre Bourdieu.” Soc. Stud. Sci. 33 (2003): 613–621.
Essay review of Pierre BOURDIEU, Science de la science et
réflexivité (2001).
194. MICKO, Hans Christoph. “On the Impossibility
of Empirical Controls of Scientific Theories—From
the Point of View of a Psychologist.” Found. Sci. 9
(2004): 405–413.
195. PYENSON, Lewis. “Western Historians of Science
and Oriental Science in the Age of Imperialism.”
Special Issue: Colonial Science [ref. 658]. Hist. Scientiarum
15 (2005): 97–124.
An analysis of postmodern colonialist theory as it pertains to
the discipline of history of science, contrasting the legacies
of Said and Sarton.
196. ROTH, Wolff-Michael. “Making Classifications
(at) Work: Ordering Practices in Science.” Soc. Stud.
Sci. 35 (2005): 581–621.
197. SHINN, Terry, and Pascal RAGOUET. Controverses
sur la science : Pour une sociologie transversaliste
de l’activité scientifique. Cours et Travaux. (237
pp.; bibl.; index.) Paris: Raisons d’Agir Éditions,
2005. ISBN: 2912107237.
198. SHRUM, Wesley. “Science and the Committee
Process: The Presentation of the Scientific Self.” Soc.
Stud. Sci. 34 (2004): 427–432.
Essay review of Stephen HILGARTNER, Science on Stage
(2000).
199. SIMS, Benjamin. “Safe Science: Material and
Social Order in Laboratory Work.” Soc. Stud. Sci. 35
(2005): 333–366.
200. STOLZENBERG, Gabriel. “Kinder, Gentler
Science Wars.” Soc. Stud. Sci. 34 (2004): 77–89.
Commentary follows by Jay A. LABINGER, Michael LYNCH,
Peter R. SAULSON, Harry COLLINS, Jean BRICMONT, Alan
SOKAL, and Gabriel STOLZENBERG. Essay review of Jay
A. LABINGER and Harry COLLINS (eds.), The one culture?
(2001).