06.08.2015 Views

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006 - Archive

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006 - Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transitional</strong> <strong>Laws</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> <strong>2006</strong>have this type <strong>of</strong> autonomy. This raises the question <strong>of</strong> the basis on whichthe two prov<strong>in</strong>ces differ, and what the criteria are on the basis <strong>of</strong> which oneprov<strong>in</strong>ce does, and the other does not have essential autonomy.Issues which are <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial significance are regulated by the law (whichthe Parliament <strong>of</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> br<strong>in</strong>gs) 143 , while <strong>in</strong> the Article 183 it is stated thatthose issues can be <strong>in</strong> the field <strong>of</strong>:1. urban plann<strong>in</strong>g and development,2. agriculture, waterpower, forestry, hunt<strong>in</strong>g, fishery, tourism, cater<strong>in</strong>g, spas andsanatoriums, protection <strong>of</strong> environment, <strong>in</strong>dustry and craftsmanship, road, riverand railway traffic and road reconstruction, organiz<strong>in</strong>g fairs and other economicmanifestations,3. education, sports, culture, health and social protection and public <strong>in</strong>form<strong>in</strong>g on theprov<strong>in</strong>cial level 144 .Autonomous prov<strong>in</strong>ces regulate issues <strong>in</strong> these areas <strong>in</strong> accordance withthe law (which is passed by the Parliament <strong>of</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong>, because the Prov<strong>in</strong>cialParliaments are not allowed to pass laws) 145 . While autonomous prov<strong>in</strong>ceshave authentic <strong>in</strong>comes and are allowed to adm<strong>in</strong>ister their revenues, theymust be <strong>in</strong> ways that fully comply with the stipulations <strong>in</strong> the law. Thispractically means that Vojvod<strong>in</strong>a will possess its revenues and property(which will be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the Parliament <strong>of</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> through laws), but theParliament <strong>of</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> will legally regulate how Vojvod<strong>in</strong>a should adm<strong>in</strong>isterits property. Such a formulation <strong>of</strong> prov<strong>in</strong>cial autonomy looks more like afoster<strong>in</strong>g relation <strong>of</strong> the Republic towards the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, than like autonomy<strong>of</strong> a modern European region.The highest legal act <strong>of</strong> the Prov<strong>in</strong>ce, the Statute, is also passed with theprevious consent <strong>of</strong> the Republic Assembly 146 . This practically means thatby deny<strong>in</strong>g consent, the Parliament <strong>of</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> can obstruct the process <strong>of</strong>adopt<strong>in</strong>g the Statute. There are no regulations <strong>in</strong> the Constitution whichwould prevent such behavior <strong>of</strong> the Republic Parliament.The Government <strong>of</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> is allowed to challenge the constitutionality <strong>of</strong>143 Ibid, Article 177, Paragraph 2144 Ibid, Article 183, Paragraph 2145 Ibid146 Ibid, Article 18548

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!