06.08.2015 Views

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006 - Archive

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006 - Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transitional</strong> <strong>Laws</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> <strong>2006</strong>secrecy <strong>of</strong> correspondence and other means <strong>of</strong> communication 63 , and theprotection <strong>of</strong> data about a person 64 . This completely orig<strong>in</strong>al solution is notonly an unjustified and unnecessary tailor<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> exist<strong>in</strong>g human rights, butit also dangerously dim<strong>in</strong>ishes the rights <strong>of</strong> citizens to exercise some otheraspects <strong>of</strong> law, developed through the practice <strong>of</strong> the European Court forHuman Rights <strong>in</strong> Strasburg.Practice <strong>of</strong> European Court recognize right to privacy as one <strong>of</strong> the mostefficient obstacles for unjustified meddl<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> the state <strong>in</strong> the private lives<strong>of</strong> the citizens and an abundant source <strong>of</strong> new solutions and improvementsfor the protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dividuals 65 . Accord<strong>in</strong>g to the previous practice, <strong>in</strong>the field <strong>of</strong> this right, the Court dealt with the follow<strong>in</strong>g subjects: gather<strong>in</strong>gand us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation about a person 66 , medical exam<strong>in</strong>ations 67 , rights <strong>of</strong>persons with same sex orientation 68 , abortion 69 , privacy <strong>of</strong> sexual life 70 ,name 71 , bus<strong>in</strong>ess and pr<strong>of</strong>essional relations 72 , psychological <strong>in</strong>tegrity 73 ,biological parent<strong>in</strong>g 74 , problems <strong>of</strong> child adoption 75 , endanger<strong>in</strong>g family lifeby deportation 76 , contact <strong>of</strong> prisoners with family members 77 , <strong>in</strong>violability<strong>of</strong> the home 78 , violation <strong>of</strong> home by means <strong>of</strong> noise, smell, pollution orharassment 79 , correspondence <strong>of</strong> prisoners 80 , issues on the quality <strong>of</strong> lawswhich regulate were tapp<strong>in</strong>g and gather<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>formation 81 , and other aspects<strong>of</strong> life <strong>in</strong> which the violation <strong>of</strong> privacy is conceivable.Practic<strong>in</strong>g the right to privacy even <strong>in</strong> its narrow mean<strong>in</strong>g has beenprecluded by leav<strong>in</strong>g out this article. The concept <strong>of</strong> the right to privacyhas been articulated <strong>in</strong> the end <strong>of</strong> the 19. Century <strong>in</strong> US legal theory. It wasformulated <strong>in</strong> an expert article by Samuel D. Woren and Luis Brendis <strong>in</strong> the63 Ibid, Article 4164 Ibid, Article 4265 The European Court has taken the position that the contents <strong>of</strong> this right cannot be taxatively determ<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong>advance <strong>in</strong> the case Costello – Roberts v. Great Brita<strong>in</strong>66 For example: the case X v. Great Brita<strong>in</strong>, case X v. Austria, case Gask<strong>in</strong> v. Great Brita<strong>in</strong>, case Leander v. Sweden orthe case Rotaru v. Romania67 For example: X v. Austria, X v.Federal Republic <strong>of</strong> Germany or X v. Holland68 X v. Federal Republic <strong>of</strong> Germany, X v. Great Brita<strong>in</strong>, case Noriss i Mod<strong>in</strong>os or the case Dudgeon v. Great Brita<strong>in</strong>69 Case Bruggemann and Scheuten v. Federal Republic <strong>of</strong> Germany or Hertz v. Norway70 Case Dudgeon v. Great Brita<strong>in</strong> or X v. Federal Republic <strong>of</strong> Germany71 For example: case B v. France or the case Stjerna72 For example: case: Niemietz v. Germany73 For example: case X i Y v. Holland or the case Costello Roberts v.Great Brita<strong>in</strong>74 For example the case Kroon75 For example: case X v. France or Cecilia i Lisa Eriksson v. Sweden76 For example: case Moustaqu<strong>in</strong> v. Belgium or Beldjoudi v. France77 For example: case X v. Austria, X v. Great Brita<strong>in</strong> or X i Y v. Switzerland78 For example: case Gillow, Cyprus v. Turkey or the case Velosa Barreto79 For example: case Arrondelle v. Great Brita<strong>in</strong> or the case Powell i Rayner80 For example: case Boyle and Rice, case Reed v.Great Brita<strong>in</strong> or the case Pfeifer and Plankl81 For example: case Klass and others v.Germany, Kopp v. Switzerland or Rotaru v. Romania23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!