Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006consequences for the joined life of nations and national minorities livingin SRJ, they will be punished by a prison sentence for a duration of one toeight years, and for the criminal act in Paragraph two, by a prison sentencein the duration from one to ten years 1143 .The new Criminal Code 1144 , in the part titled “Criminal acts againstconstitutional structure and safety of the Republic of Serbia and SCG”anticipates the criminal act of “Causing national, racial and religious hatredor intolerance” 1145 . It is immediately conspicuous that the title was changed,by leaving the word “discord” out from the title of this criminal act. Theprevious law used the term “among nations and national minorities”, andthe new one uses the term “among nations and ethnic communities”.Except for this, for the criminal act from the first Paragraph, the prisonsentence of one to five years was anticipated, and according to the new oneit is six months to five years. For committing a criminal act from the thirdParagraph, the sentence was one to ten years in prison, and according to thenew law it is two to ten years.District Prosecutor’s OfficesAccording to the results of the research, 66 criminal charges which werealleged to have caused “racial, religious or national hatred or intolerance”were filed in the District Public Prosecutor’s Offices in 2004 and 2005.Twenty four of these charges were dismissed immediately, and eightindictments were raised. The other criminal charges were in the process ofinvestigation at the time, obtaining notifications or their jurisdictions weretransferred to Municipal Prosecutor’s Offices.No criminal charges connected to this criminal act were filed in the DistrictPublic Prosecutor’s Offices in Prokuplje 1146 , Smederevo 1147 , Zajecar 1148 ,Cacak 1149 , Kraljevo 1150 or Pirot 1151 .1143 Ibid, Paragraph 31144 See above under 6111145 Ibid, Article 3171146 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Prokuplje from September 12 th , 2005, number A 73/05, signedby Viseslav Bukumirovic – Public Prosecutor1147 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Smederevo from November 10 th , 2005, number A 64/05,signed by Dragoslav Markovic – Public Prosecutor1148 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Zaječar from November 7 th , 2005, number A 64/05, signedby Zorina Zogovic – Public Prosecutor1149Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Cacak from September 21 st , 2005, number 163/05, signed byMiodrag Surla – Deputy Public Prosecutor1150 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Kraljevo from September 2 nd , 2005, number A 73/05, signedby Dragan Belcevic – Deputy Public Prosecutor1151Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Pirot from September 8 th , 2005, number A 71/05, signed by200
Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006One criminal charge was filed to the District Public Prosecutor’s Officesin Kragujevac 1152 , Krusevac 1153 and Leskovac 1154 and all were dismissed.One criminal charge was also filed to the District Public Prosecutor’sOffices in Jagodina 1155 and Pancevo 1156 . In the memorandum sent to us bythe District Court in Jagodina, it is stated that a criminal charge was filedagainst Kostadinovic Bojan, Kitanovic Predrag, Sorlic Ljubise, StojanovicIvan, Rasic Zivadin, Sorlic Ivica, all from Trnava, and against Vasic Sasafrom Jagodina on the suspicion of committing this criminal act 1157 . Afteran investigation was conducted, it was determined that they had committedthe criminal act of “endangering safety” 1158 . The District Court in Pancevohad, after conducting an investigation, raised an indictment against twopersons, on the suspicion of committing this criminal act 1159 .Two criminal charges were filed to the District Public Prosecutor’s Officesin Negotin 1160 and Valjevo 1161 . The Negotin Prosecutor’s Office dismissedthe charges immediately, and the other was, at that time, still in the phase ofobtaining notifications 1162 , while the Prosecution in Valjevo dismissed oneof the charges, and raised an indictment on the other 1163 .Three criminal charges were filed to the District Public Prosecutor’s Officesin Uzice 1164 , Nis 1165 , Pozarevac 1166 and Sombor 1167 . The Prosecution in Uzicetransferred two charges to the Municipal Prosecution’s Office, becauseTihomir Djordjevic1152 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Kragujevac from November 8 th , 2005, number A 380/05,signed by Slavoljub Dimitrijevic – Deputy Public Prosecutor1153 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Krusevac from November 4 th , 2005, number KTR 417/05,signed by Radmila Jovanovic – Public Prosecutor1154 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Leksovac from August 30 th , 2005, number A 127/05, signedby Edvarda Jerin – Public Prosecutor1155 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Jagodina from August 31 st , 2005, number A 133/05, signed byGoran Busarcevic – Public Prosecutor1156 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Pancevo from September 12 th , 2005, number KTR 306/05,signed by Niskanovic Milan – Public Prosecutor1157 See above under 11551158 The Criminal Code, Article 67, Paragraph 2, see above 6111159 See above under 11561160 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Negotin from September 16 th , 2005, number A 102/2005,signed by Miroslav Sozentic – Public Prosecutor1161 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Valjevo from September 5 th , 2005, number A 107/05, signedby Zlatko Sulovic – Public Prosecutor1162 See above under 11601163 See above under 11611164 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Uzice from November 3 rd , 2005, number A 110/05, signed byBlazenko Vesnic – Deputy Public Prosecutor1165 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Niš from September 21 st , 2005, number A 158/05, signed bySvetlana Savovic – Public Prosecutor1166 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Pozarevac from September 1 st , 2005, number A 47/05, signedby Dragan Petrovic – Public Prosecutor1167 Report of the District Prosecutor’s Office in Sombor from September 2 nd , 2005, number A 49/05, signedby Borislav Krujakov – Public Prosecutor201
Page 2 and 3:
Implementation of Transitional Laws
Page 4 and 5:
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
138Implementation of Transitional L
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143:
Page 144 and 145:
Page 146 and 147:
Page 148 and 149:
Page 150 and 151: Implementation of Transitional Laws
show all

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?