Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006same school and had disputes resulting in fight 1114 . Father of the minorR.K. is a policeman in the Doljevac police station. The Slavkovic familyclaim that during a long period of time minor daughters of the policemanRandjelovic Predrag R.K. and R.K. have violent behavior towards their minordaughter S.I. and therefore she turned to school principal, psychologist andpedagogue on several occasions but without any success 1115 .After the biggest fight of minors so far on March 27, 2003, police patrol ofthe Doljevac police, formed by two policemen Petkovic Slavisa and the onenick-named Mica, came to the Slavkovic family house in Sarlinac duringbirthday celebration of Slavkovic Srboljub and Tanja’s younger minordaughter S.Dj. 1116 Birthday celebration was interrupted because policemenwanted to make an informative interview with minor S.I. 1117 In the criminalcharges Slavkovic Srboljub and Tanja pressed against Randjelovic Predrag,Stamenkovic Ljubisa, Petkovic Slavisa and NN member of the police called„Mica“ due to authorities exceeding and abuse of duty it is said: “After thebirthday celebration had been stopped, patrol members in the presenceof those who pressed charges questioned minor S.I. what caused her bigstress… 1118 ”During police patrol in Doljevac, in the house of the Slavkovic family,minor S.I. locked herself in the bathroom with fear and she went out onlyat parents’ request 1119 . After submitters had seen the mental condition oftheir minor child and police patrol members saw it, too, professional helpwas asked in the Mental Health Clinic 1120 . S.I. was immediately hospitalizedand admitted for eight-day treatment in the clinic followed by thirteen-daytreatment hospital 1121 .The Municipal Prosecutor’s Office in Nis informed family Slavkovic onJuly 13 that the charges were dropped due to lack of foundation for legalproceedings against mentioned persons 1122 . On the other hand, after the1114 Ibid1115 See: Complaint to the Principal of “Vuk Stefanovic Karadzic” school, from March 27 th , 2006, available inthe Initiative’s documentation1116 See above under 11131117 See the Nis Municipal Court verdict No. K. 1344/2003, especially statements from witnesses JovancicVesna, Jovancic Sinisa and Jovancic Vlastimir1118 Criminal charges are available in the Initiative’s documentation1119 See above under 11131120 Entire medical record on minor S.I.’s health is available in the Initiative’s documentation1121 Ibid1122 See official letter from District Attorney’s Office in Nis regarding drops on criminal charges KT No. 416/03is available in the Initiative’s documentationIbid192
Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006official letter Initiative sent to General Inspector of the Serbian InteriorMinistry stating complaint regarding misdemeanor of the police membersin the Doljevac police, following was replied: “We inform you that afterchecking statements from your petition it was determined that the petition,complaining to treatment of police members in the Doljevac police inSecretariat of Interior in Nis, was founded. There will be taken measuresagainst responsible employees under the jurisdiction of the Ministry ofInterior 1123 .After their charges were dropped, family Slavkovic filed request to themagistrate in Municipal Court in Nis for investigation against mentionedpolicemen in the Doljevac police 1124 , and then, as subsidiary prosecutors,direct indictment to the Municipal Court in Nis 1125 . The main hearing inthis case was finished on October 27, 2004 when the bar president KatarinaRanjelovic reached the verdict acquitting Predrag Randjelovic, SlavisaPetkovic and Miroljub Stevanovic and obliging subsidiary prosecutorsSlavkovic Srboljub and Tanja to pay for judicial expenses in the amount of63,000 dinars within 15 days from the final judgment 1126 .After an appeal filed by family Slavkovic against this verdict and due toviolation of criminal procedure acts, incorrect establishment of facts andbreach of Criminal Code 1127 , the Nis District Court on May 11 th , 2006adopted a decision taking the damaged party complaint into considerationand returned the case to the District Court in Nis for retrial 1128 . Expositionof this decision says: “When evaluating the evidence, subjective courtconviction is not substantial but conviction based on facts. Facts that minorinjured party S.I. is 11 years old, she had a birthday celebration in her houseattended by many people, defendants interrupted the celebration to act byorder of their superior Ljubisa Stamenkovic, who conducted an interviewwith the minor S.I. and duration of that interview represent facts whichthe first instance court did not give significance they had. The first instancecourt was obliged but failed to explain, with the help of professionals, howofficer should treat minors especially bearing in mind the reasons of such1123 Official letter from General Inspector number 3436/05 signed by colonel Mirjana Orasin is available in theInitiative’s documentation1124 Demand for investigation is filed on August 8 th , 2003 No. KTP 416/03 and is available in the Initiative’sdocumentation1125 Direct indictment filed on December 1 st , 2003 No. Ki 720/03 is available in the Initiative’s documentation1126 See the Nis Municipal Court Verdict No. K-1344/2003, available in the Initiative’s documentation1127 Appeal to the Nis Municipal Court Verdict No. K-1344/03, available in the Initiative’s documentation1128 Decision from the District Court in Nis, No KŽ 500/05, available in the Initiative’s documentation193
Page 2 and 3:
Implementation of Transitional Laws
Page 4 and 5:
Page 6 and 7:
Page 8:
Page 12 and 13:
Page 14 and 15:
Page 16 and 17:
Page 18 and 19:
Page 20 and 21:
Page 22 and 23:
Page 24 and 25:
Page 26 and 27:
Page 28 and 29:
Page 30 and 31:
Page 32 and 33:
Page 34 and 35:
Page 36 and 37:
Page 38 and 39:
Page 40 and 41:
Page 42 and 43:
Page 44 and 45:
Page 46 and 47:
Page 48 and 49:
Page 50 and 51:
Page 52 and 53:
Page 54 and 55:
Page 56 and 57:
Page 58 and 59:
Page 60 and 61:
Page 62 and 63:
Page 64 and 65:
Page 66 and 67:
Page 68 and 69:
Page 70 and 71:
Page 72 and 73:
Page 74 and 75:
Page 76 and 77:
Page 78 and 79:
Page 80 and 81:
Page 82 and 83:
Page 84 and 85:
Page 86 and 87:
Page 88 and 89:
Page 90 and 91:
Page 92 and 93:
Page 94 and 95:
Page 96 and 97:
Page 98 and 99:
Page 100 and 101:
Page 102 and 103:
Page 104 and 105:
Page 106 and 107:
Page 108 and 109:
Page 110 and 111:
Page 112 and 113:
Page 114 and 115:
Page 116 and 117:
Page 118 and 119:
Page 120 and 121:
Page 122 and 123:
Page 124 and 125:
Page 126 and 127:
Page 128 and 129:
Page 130 and 131:
Page 132 and 133:
Page 134 and 135:
Page 136 and 137:
Page 138 and 139:
138Implementation of Transitional L
Page 140 and 141:
Page 142 and 143: Implementation of Transitional Laws
show all

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?