06.08.2015 Views

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006 - Archive

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006 - Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transitional</strong> <strong>Laws</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> <strong>2006</strong>A similar stipulation exists <strong>in</strong> almost all the documents that deal withhuman rights. It has been articulated more than two centuries ago <strong>in</strong> the 9 thAmendment <strong>of</strong> the USA Constitution. It states:“The enumeration <strong>in</strong> the Constitution, <strong>of</strong> certa<strong>in</strong> rights, shall not beconstrued to deny or disparage others reta<strong>in</strong>ed by the people.” (Constitution<strong>of</strong> the United States <strong>of</strong> America, adopted 1787, Amendment number 9,adopted 1791).The pr<strong>in</strong>ciple that a human right (which is <strong>in</strong>nate and belongs to an<strong>in</strong>dividual as soon as he/she is born), although not explicitly guaranteed bya document, is a very powerful pr<strong>in</strong>ciple and represents one <strong>of</strong> the cornerstones <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>ternational law as it perta<strong>in</strong>s to human rights. By eras<strong>in</strong>g it fromthe Constitution <strong>of</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong>, a clear message is be<strong>in</strong>g sent that human rightswere not a priority to the creators <strong>of</strong> this constitution.Another th<strong>in</strong>g that can be noticed is the unnecessary reduction <strong>of</strong> the earlierthree Paragraphs <strong>of</strong> the Small Charter to only one sentence <strong>in</strong> Paragraph1 <strong>of</strong> the new Constitution. Unpolished and un<strong>in</strong>telligible sentences, whichare found <strong>in</strong> abundance <strong>in</strong> this Constitution, are not welcome <strong>in</strong> any legalacts, especially not <strong>in</strong> the supreme legal act. As <strong>in</strong> many other articles <strong>of</strong>the Constitution, it is unclear why identical regulations <strong>in</strong> the Small Charterwere not simply copied.The Constitution <strong>of</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> can be compared only to the previous legaldocument which used to regulate human and m<strong>in</strong>ority rights. In the case <strong>of</strong><strong>Serbia</strong>, that is the Charter on Human and M<strong>in</strong>ority Rights. Consider<strong>in</strong>g this,the arguments <strong>of</strong> some politicians and lawyers that human and m<strong>in</strong>ority rightsare better regulated by this Constitution than by Milosevic’s Constitution,are superfluous 42 . The only po<strong>in</strong>t <strong>of</strong> reference for the improvement oraggravation <strong>of</strong> the matter <strong>of</strong> regulat<strong>in</strong>g human and m<strong>in</strong>ority rights is theSmall Charter, and not the Constitution from 1990.42 The text <strong>of</strong> the Constitution is better, but the implementation…, B92, October 16 th , <strong>2006</strong>, website: http://www.b92.net/<strong>in</strong>fo/vesti/u_fokusu.php?id=122&start=75&nav_id=216597, visited on November 23 rd , <strong>2006</strong>; ThisConstitution is better than Milosevic’s, B92, October 3 rd , <strong>2006</strong>, website: http://www.b92.net/<strong>in</strong>fo/vesti/u_fokusu.php?id=122&start=150&nav_id=214073, visited on November 23 rd , <strong>2006</strong>16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!