06.08.2015 Views

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006 - Archive

Implementation of Transitional Laws in Serbia 2006 - Archive

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transitional</strong> <strong>Laws</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> <strong>2006</strong><strong>of</strong> secrecy <strong>of</strong> letters and other forms <strong>of</strong> communication. In that sense,decisions on such actions are classified as secret <strong>in</strong> the Law on SecurityIntelligence Agency and sub-legal acts <strong>of</strong> the Agency” 790 . It is true that theConstitution <strong>of</strong> the Republic <strong>of</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> considers this as legal <strong>in</strong> certa<strong>in</strong>situations, but it is questionable to what degree BIA does it, as violation <strong>of</strong>the rights and freedoms <strong>of</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong>n citizens is allowed only to a certa<strong>in</strong> limitand does not depend on the discretion evaluation <strong>of</strong> BIA’s managers.The <strong>Serbia</strong>n Supreme Court <strong>in</strong> a closed session held on April 19, <strong>2006</strong>passed a decision that BIA rejected 791 . Members <strong>of</strong> the council were judgesJadranka Injac, Borivoje Bunjevacki, Zoja Popovic and court counselorVera Mar<strong>in</strong>kovic 792 . Not go<strong>in</strong>g deeper <strong>in</strong>to the merits, the Supreme Courtestablished that BIA cannot be the party <strong>in</strong> the procedure and thereforeit cannot be the prosecutor <strong>in</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istrative procedure either. BIAhad no active legitimacy <strong>in</strong> the dispute as execution <strong>of</strong> the right to freeaccess to <strong>in</strong>formation is an adm<strong>in</strong>istrative affair that is solved through theimplementation <strong>of</strong> the Law on General Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Procedure 793 , whichstipulates that prosecutor <strong>in</strong> the adm<strong>in</strong>istrative procedure can be a physicalperson, legal person or other party if it th<strong>in</strong>ks that adm<strong>in</strong>istrative act violatedsome right or legal <strong>in</strong>terest 794 . The decision <strong>of</strong> the commissioner did notdecide on BIA’s right or legal <strong>in</strong>terest, but the agency’s obligations to actas first-<strong>in</strong>stance adm<strong>in</strong>istration body follow<strong>in</strong>g a request <strong>of</strong> the Initiative.Follow<strong>in</strong>g this decision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Serbia</strong>n Supreme Court, the decision <strong>of</strong> thecommissioner became executive so BIA was obliged to submit the required<strong>in</strong>formation with<strong>in</strong> seven days. BIA has not done so to date.After BIA’s rejection to submit the required data, apart from the decision <strong>of</strong>the commissioner and decision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Serbia</strong>n Supreme Court, the Initiativedecided to use the last mechanism to protect the right to free access to<strong>in</strong>formation that the law allows and to submit a request for execution <strong>of</strong> thecommissioner’s decision to the <strong>Serbia</strong>n government 795 . Under the Law onFree Access to Information, the commissioner decisions are obligatory, and790 The charges that BIA raised to the <strong>Serbia</strong>n Supreme Court are available <strong>in</strong> the Initiative’s documentation791 Decision <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Serbia</strong>n Supreme Court no. U. 247/06 <strong>of</strong> May 23 rd , <strong>2006</strong>, available <strong>in</strong> the Initiative’s documentation792 Ibid793 The Law on General Adm<strong>in</strong>istrative Procedure (Official Gazette <strong>of</strong> the FRY Nos. 33/97 and 31/2001),adopted on July 19 th , 1997. Changes and amendments to this law were adopted on July 5 th , 2001794 See above under 791795 The Initiative submitted a request to the <strong>Serbia</strong>n government on May, 29 th , <strong>2006</strong> and it available <strong>in</strong> theInitiative’s documentation146

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!