<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transitional</strong> <strong>Laws</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> <strong>2006</strong>The second verdict by the War Crimes Chamber was reached on January 30 th ,<strong>2006</strong>, <strong>in</strong> the “Bulic” case. The accused Milan Bulic was sentenced to eightyears <strong>in</strong> prison for committ<strong>in</strong>g a crim<strong>in</strong>al act, war crime aga<strong>in</strong>st prisoners<strong>of</strong> war 670 .Crim<strong>in</strong>al proceed<strong>in</strong>gs aga<strong>in</strong>st Milan Bulic were separated fromthe ma<strong>in</strong> “Ovcara” case on January 28 th 2005, because <strong>of</strong> his poor healthcondition 671 .After that, a court rul<strong>in</strong>g was passed <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> “Sasa Radak”, whowas sentenced to 20 years <strong>of</strong> prison for participat<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the liquidation<strong>of</strong> prisoners <strong>of</strong> war who were taken from the “Ovcara” agricultural farmand killed at “Grabovo” on November 21, 1992. The rul<strong>in</strong>g states thatSasa Radak, a.k.a. “Cleaner”, headed the so-called “Death platoon <strong>of</strong> theTerritorial Defense”, that he was with the soldiers who beat the prisonersand that he cont<strong>in</strong>ued with the maltreatment <strong>of</strong> prisoners <strong>in</strong> a storageshed <strong>in</strong> Ovcara. 672 When the sentence was be<strong>in</strong>g read out, Sasa Radak wasremoved from court as he swore and called the judge “a tramp” 673 .The last <strong>in</strong> a serious <strong>of</strong> verdicts by the War Crimes Council <strong>of</strong> theBelgrade District Court was passed on September 18, when Anton Lekajwas sentenced to 13 years <strong>of</strong> prison for execut<strong>in</strong>g war crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st civilpopulations 674 . The <strong>in</strong>dictment charged Lekaj with execution or <strong>in</strong>volvement<strong>in</strong> the execution <strong>of</strong> four <strong>in</strong>dividuals. It was proven that Lekaj was certa<strong>in</strong>ly<strong>in</strong>volved <strong>in</strong> the murder <strong>of</strong> Salja Redj, but not <strong>in</strong> the executions <strong>of</strong> SaljaBedri, Zvezdana Ljusaj and Rade Gagovic 675 . It was established that AntonLekaj together with Arben Skupi killed Salja Redj, but it was not establishedwhich <strong>of</strong> the two <strong>of</strong> them did it 676 . In any case, the court decided that evenif he did not shoot, Anton Lekaj was an accomplice 677 . It was proven thatAnton Lekaj raped m<strong>in</strong>or S<strong>of</strong>ija Tafaj <strong>in</strong> a room at the Pastrik hotel, but it wasnot established that he raped her aga<strong>in</strong> on a table <strong>in</strong> the hotel’s basement 678 .The court also ruled that Anton Lekaj did not do a sexual perversion overSalja Bedriju for which he had been charged 679 . Therefore, Anton Lekaj is670 CL SFRY, Article 144671 Second verdict <strong>of</strong> the War Crimes Chamber, see web page: http://okruznisudbg.org.yu/content/<strong>2006</strong>/Druga%20presuda/view?searchterm=bulić%20OR%20булић, visited on November 25 th , <strong>2006</strong>672 20 years for Radak because <strong>of</strong> Ovcara, B92, September 16 th , <strong>2006</strong>, See: http://www.b92.net/<strong>in</strong>fo/vesti/<strong>in</strong>dex.php?yyyy=<strong>2006</strong>&mm=09&dd=06&nav_id=210842,visited on November 25 th , <strong>2006</strong>673 Ibid674 The report <strong>of</strong> the Initiative from the pronouncement <strong>of</strong> the verdict to Anton Lekaj from September 18 th ,<strong>2006</strong>, is <strong>in</strong> the Initiative’s documentation675 Ibid676 Ibid677 Ibid678 Ibid679 Ibid122
<strong>Implementation</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Transitional</strong> <strong>Laws</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Serbia</strong> <strong>2006</strong>responsible for murders, tortures, <strong>in</strong>human acts, <strong>in</strong>flict<strong>in</strong>g body wounds andrap<strong>in</strong>g civilians on the territory <strong>of</strong> the Djakovica municipality <strong>in</strong> June 1999 680 .F<strong>in</strong>ally, the president <strong>of</strong> the council, Olivera Andjelkovic, po<strong>in</strong>ted out thatthe court encountered a great obstruction on the side <strong>of</strong> UNMIK judiciary,which, follow<strong>in</strong>g a request <strong>of</strong> the Belgrade District Court, decided to allowthe hear<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> defense witnesses only, but not <strong>of</strong> prosecution witnessesliv<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> Kosovo 681 . Tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account all extenuat<strong>in</strong>g and aggravat<strong>in</strong>gcircumstances <strong>of</strong> the case, requests <strong>of</strong> the prosecution and the defense andthe Crim<strong>in</strong>al Code <strong>of</strong> the FRY, under which a maximum prison sentence isone <strong>of</strong> 20 years for this deed, the court decided to sentence Anton Lekajto 13 years <strong>of</strong> prison 682 . Olivera Andjelkovic ended the court proceed<strong>in</strong>gsby say<strong>in</strong>g: “Mr. Lekaj, we did not sentence you because you were a KLAmember, nor because you are an Albanian. We have sentenced you for thecrimes you committed aga<strong>in</strong>st civilians, and civilians are sacred” 683 .Before the War Crimes Chamber was formed, two war crime cases were<strong>in</strong>itiated and completed before Belgrade and Prokuplje District Courts,“Sjever<strong>in</strong>” 684 and “Sasa Cvjetan” 685 .Interest<strong>in</strong>g is the fact that the War Crimes Chamber is authorized to process23 different crim<strong>in</strong>al acts, listed <strong>in</strong> chapter XVI <strong>of</strong> the Basic Crim<strong>in</strong>alCode and certa<strong>in</strong> number <strong>of</strong> crim<strong>in</strong>al acts which were envisaged by theHague Tribunal Statute, but so far they have only processed two types <strong>of</strong>crim<strong>in</strong>al acts: war crimes aga<strong>in</strong>st prisoners <strong>of</strong> war 686 and war crimes aga<strong>in</strong>stcivilians 687 .680 Ibid681 Ibid682 Ibid683 Ibid684 K. no. 668/2002685 K. no. 1823/04686 “Ovcara” case, K.B. 01/03, verdict reached on December 12 th , 2005687 Cases: “Sjever<strong>in</strong>” – K.B. 94/02, “Sasa Cvjetan” – K.B. 1273/02, “Anton Lekaj” – K.B. 7/04, “Zvornik”– K.B. 17/04, “Skorpioni” – K.B. 3/05123