31.07.2015 Views

Diffuse interface models in fluid mechanics

Diffuse interface models in fluid mechanics

Diffuse interface models in fluid mechanics

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

is no longer the case and some of them are now discussed.At a critical po<strong>in</strong>t, the properties of both phases become equal. Above the critical po<strong>in</strong>t, atwo-phase system cannot exist and the <strong>fluid</strong> exists only as a one-phase <strong>fluid</strong>. On the contrary, belowthe critical po<strong>in</strong>t, under certa<strong>in</strong> conditions, the <strong>fluid</strong> can co-exist under two different phasesseparated by an <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong>. As the two-phase system system approaches the critical po<strong>in</strong>t frombelow, the thickness of the <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong> actually <strong>in</strong>creases and becomes <strong>in</strong>f<strong>in</strong>ite at the critical po<strong>in</strong>t.Thus, just below the critical po<strong>in</strong>t, the typical size of the transition layer that separates the bulkphases becomes of the same order of magnitude as the typical size of the bulk phases. Therefore,the <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong> cannot be modeled as a surface of discont<strong>in</strong>uity and its <strong>in</strong>ternal structure has to bedescribed .Let us consider two air bubbles <strong>in</strong> liquid water. It is commonly observed that two bubbles cancoalesce, i.e. they merge to give rise to a s<strong>in</strong>gle bubble. If the <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong>s are modeled as a surfaceof discont<strong>in</strong>uity, just at the moment where they merge, the model is s<strong>in</strong>gular. In a sense, one ofthe <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong>s desappears and this is not possible if the <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong> is discont<strong>in</strong>uous. To overcomethis s<strong>in</strong>gularity, one has to study the detailed <strong>in</strong>teraction of the <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong>s dur<strong>in</strong>g their merg<strong>in</strong>g.This can be done only by account<strong>in</strong>g for the <strong>in</strong>ternal structure of the <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong>s [Lee et al., 2002a,b].Another situation, actually similar to the previous one, is the description of the creation of asecond phase <strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>itially s<strong>in</strong>gle-phase system; this is called nucleation. In this case, one hasto describe how, from a s<strong>in</strong>gle phase, an <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong> is created. This cont<strong>in</strong>uous process can bemodeled only if the <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong> under construction is modeled as a cont<strong>in</strong>uous medium [Dell’Isolaet al., 1996].1.3.2 Numerical limitationsIn the previous section, we have shown that, <strong>in</strong> some cases, the idealization of an <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong> asa surface of discont<strong>in</strong>uity is physically irrelevant and the detailed structure has to be described.However, <strong>in</strong> many applications, these phenomena can be neglected or do not occur. Nevertheless,the coupled partial differential equations that describe the two-phase flow are highlynon-l<strong>in</strong>ear and numerical simulation is often necessary to solve them. The numerical simulationof two-phase flows is very challeng<strong>in</strong>g because it is a mov<strong>in</strong>g boundary problem. Several numericaltechniques exist to solve this k<strong>in</strong>d of problems and their description is beyond the scopeof this presentation. These techniques are often difficult to implement numerically, especially <strong>in</strong>three space dimensions, and sometimes depend on the know-how of the code developper. Thisis partially due to the lack of a clear mathematical background for some of the methods. Nevertheless,the boundary conditions that must be applied at the mov<strong>in</strong>g <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong>s need a particulartreatment <strong>in</strong> the numerical algorithm, which is difficult and often tedious. This is why diffuse<strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong> methods can be numerically attractive. If one can come up with a system of partial differentialequations that is valid <strong>in</strong> the entire two-phase system, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> the cont<strong>in</strong>uoustransition <strong>in</strong>terfacial zones, the motion of the entire two-phase system would be describe by thiss<strong>in</strong>gle system of equations, which thus elim<strong>in</strong>ates the difficult problem of the particular treatmentof the boundary conditions at the <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong>s. The programm<strong>in</strong>g effort would therefore be highlydecreased. Moreover, if these equations are obta<strong>in</strong>ed from first pr<strong>in</strong>ciples, the development ofaccurate numerical schemes can be based on a better mathematical ground [Jamet et al., 2002].2 Liquid-vapor flows with phase-change: the van der Waals modelof capillarityIn this section, we present the van der Waals model of capillarity. This model is a diffuse <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong>model dedicated to the description of an <strong><strong>in</strong>terface</strong> that separates a liquid and a vapor phase of8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!