30.07.2015 Views

Déformation photoinduite dans les films minces contenant des ...

Déformation photoinduite dans les films minces contenant des ...

Déformation photoinduite dans les films minces contenant des ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 3. Microscopic mechanisms at the origin of the photo-induced deformation inazobenzene-containing thin <strong>films</strong> 92experiments with different assisting beam intensities. In order to vary the polarizationmodulation from zero we consider the case of p-assisted s-polarized interference for whichthere is no modulation of the polarization when the assisting beam is off (see 3.4.1).In Figure 3.27 we show the deformation kinetics obtained on a sol-gel sample 19 (quantitativedata are reported in Table 3.3) for different power densities of the p-polarizedassisting beam, while the s-polarized interfering beams have always the same powerdensity of 1 mW/mm 2 per beam. In this experiment, the interfering and the assistingbeams are switched on simultaneously at t = 0, in order to measure the full evolution ofthe assisted photoinduced deformation. The growth rate is the slope of the deformationkinetics: for the matrix photoexpansion mechanism it is measured at t = 0, while forthe mass migration mechanism it is measured over the first 100 s of irradiation, duringwhich the deformation amplitude is quasi-linear.pastel-00527388, version 1 - 19 Oct 2010With no assisting beam (Figure 3.27(a)), the photoinduced deformation is only dueto photoexpansion, which is characterized by a high rate and a low efficiency with a maximumdeformation of ≃ 7 nm. Using 0.4 mW p-polarized assisting beam (Figure 3.27(b))is sufficient to activate the matter migration with a low SRG growth rate of 0.04 nm/s.In this case, as the light intensity contrast 20 is ≃ 90%, we measure a smaller deformationdue to the photoexpansion (≃ 4 nm). When increasing the intensity of the assistingbeam (hence reducing the contrast), the photoexpansion contribution to the deformationvanishes (it almost disappears in (d) where the optical contrast is ≃ 78%), while mattermigration is more and more efficient (d-f). At the maximum power density availablefor the assisting beam, 2.1 mW/mm 2 , where the ratio between the assisting and theincident beams power densities is ≃ 1, we obtain a higher SRG growth rate of 2.1 nm/s.Let us define the spatial modulation of the polarization as E pol = min{E‖ 0 , E0 ⊥ } (byanalogy with section 3.3.2). The parallel component is provided only by the assistingbeam 21 (E‖0 = √ I assist ) while the perpendicular component is given by the interferingbeams (E⊥ 0 = √ I interf ). For assisting beam intensities smaller than the intensity interferencepattern amplitude, we have: E pol = E‖ 0 = √ I assist . So, we expect that the efficiencyof the SRG formation increases as √ I assist .In Figure 3.28 we compare the SRG growth rate experimentally observed (□) andthe corresponding values of √ I assist .The close correlation between the experimental19 In this experiment we used a 450 nm thick sol-gel sample, as we wanted to better discriminatebetween the photoexpansion and the matter migration mechanisms. As shown in [9], the photoexpansionmechanism is dependent on the thickness, while [15] matter migration efficiency doesn’t significantlychange using a 200 nm or a 450 nm thick sample.20 Defined asImax − IminI max, where I max and I min are the maximum and the minimum intensity valuesof the total light field.21 We recall that the p-polarized assisting beam is in normal incidence on the sample.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!