30.07.2015 Views

the drivers of customers' satisfaction of airtel bangladesh limited

the drivers of customers' satisfaction of airtel bangladesh limited

the drivers of customers' satisfaction of airtel bangladesh limited

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

BANGLADESH RESEARCH PUBLICATIONS JOURNALISSN: 1998-2003, Volume: 7, Issue: 4, Page: 437-445, November - December, 2012THE DRIVERS OF CUSTOMERS’ SATISFACTION OF AIRTELBANGLADESH LIMITEDM. S. Hossain 1 *, M. A. Hossain 2 and M. J. A. Siddikee 3M. S. Hossain, M. A. Hossain and M. J. A. Siddikee (2012). The Drivers <strong>of</strong> Customers’ Satisfaction <strong>of</strong>Airtel Bangladesh Limited. Bangladesh Res. Pub. J. 7(4): 437-445. Retrieve fromhttp://www.bdresearchpublications.com/admin/journal/upload/09366/09366.pdfAbstractThe study attempts to identify <strong>the</strong> most important <strong>drivers</strong> <strong>of</strong> customers’<strong>satisfaction</strong> <strong>of</strong> Airtel in Bangladesh. This research also explores <strong>customers'</strong><strong>satisfaction</strong> towards <strong>the</strong> existing attributes <strong>of</strong> Airtel in Bangladesh. Thesurvey conduct in Dhaka and Rangpur division during four weeks period inAugust and September, 2012, between 8th August to 6th September, 2012.The study surveyed 120 Airtel customers to determine <strong>the</strong> key factors thatsignificantly influence on <strong>the</strong>ir perceptions. In <strong>the</strong> study, data have beencollected by questionnaires. They are analysed by statistical tools namelymean, standard deviation (SD) and coefficient <strong>of</strong> correlation. This paperreports <strong>the</strong> findings from a survey on Airtel customers on <strong>the</strong>se issues andtests a number <strong>of</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>ses pertaining to <strong>the</strong>m. The result confirms thatcustomer value is <strong>the</strong> most important <strong>drivers</strong> <strong>of</strong> customers’ <strong>satisfaction</strong> <strong>of</strong>Airtel in Bangladesh. The study shows that Airtel has been successful tobuild a superior image with some additional features in comparison to itscompetitors and <strong>the</strong> users are mostly satisfied with <strong>the</strong> initial price <strong>of</strong> Airtelconnections, handsets and network. The study also reveals that <strong>the</strong>re aresome factors like quality <strong>of</strong> air time, service <strong>of</strong> helpline, service <strong>of</strong>information centres, high billing rate etc. that are acting behind customers’dis<strong>satisfaction</strong> and need to be improved for higher market share.Key Words: Drivers, Customers’ <strong>satisfaction</strong>, Airtel, and BangladeshIntroductionAirtel Bangladesh Ltd. is a GSM-based cellular operator in Bangladesh.Airtel is <strong>the</strong> sixth mobile phone carrier to enter <strong>the</strong> Bangladesh market, andoriginally launched commercial operations under <strong>the</strong> brand name "WaridTelecom" on May 10, 2007. Warid Telecom International LLC, an Abu Dhabi basedconsortium, sold a majority 70% stake in <strong>the</strong> company to India's Bharti AirtelLimited for US$300 million. Bharti Airtel Limited took management control <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>company and its board, and rebranded <strong>the</strong> company's services under its ownAirtel brand from December 20, 2010. The Bangladesh TelecommunicationRegulatory Commission approved <strong>the</strong> deal on Jan 4, 2010. Airtel is <strong>the</strong> sixthtelecom operators in Bangladesh. As an emerging company Airtel is doingextremely well. After <strong>the</strong> launch <strong>of</strong> Airtel in Bangladesh, <strong>the</strong> competition hasbecome more streng<strong>the</strong>n among <strong>the</strong> telecom operators. Each <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m is fightingto boost up its market share by <strong>of</strong>fering new promotion and benefits to <strong>the</strong>customers. Since, all <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> operators are <strong>of</strong>fering almost same categories <strong>of</strong>products it has become a big challenge to retain <strong>the</strong> existing subscribers and*Corresponding Author’s e-mail: hmd.shamim@gmail.com1Department <strong>of</strong> Marketing, 2 Department <strong>of</strong> Management and 3 Department <strong>of</strong> Finance andBanking, Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University, Dinajpur, Bangladesh.


Hossain et al.acquisition <strong>of</strong> new customers. At this moment Airtel is trying to reach <strong>the</strong>customers with various promotional activities and is attempting to make <strong>the</strong>irbrand presence felt. Through <strong>the</strong>ir significant advances in Bangladesh, Airtel ismoving ahead on <strong>the</strong> track to achieve <strong>the</strong>ir goals. Today, it would be difficult t<strong>of</strong>ind a company that does not proudly claim to be a customer-oriented,customer- focused, or even-customer driven enterprise. Increasing competition(whe<strong>the</strong>r for-pr<strong>of</strong>it or nonpr<strong>of</strong>it) is forcing businesses to pay much more attentionto satisfy customers. The state <strong>of</strong> <strong>satisfaction</strong> depends on a number <strong>of</strong> bothpsychological and physical variables, which correlate with <strong>satisfaction</strong> behaviors.The level <strong>of</strong> <strong>satisfaction</strong> can also vary depending on o<strong>the</strong>r options <strong>the</strong> customermay have and o<strong>the</strong>r products against which <strong>the</strong> customer can compare <strong>the</strong>organizations product. Customers <strong>satisfaction</strong> has now become majorconcern <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> mobile service providers in our country. The objective <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> studyis to identify <strong>the</strong> most important <strong>drivers</strong> <strong>of</strong> customers’ <strong>satisfaction</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>airtel</strong> inBangladesh. The study also focuses on <strong>the</strong> following objectives:- To know <strong>the</strong> existing attributes <strong>of</strong> Airtel and <strong>the</strong> customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> leveltowards some selective factors <strong>of</strong> Airtel.- To show <strong>the</strong> relationship between customers’ <strong>satisfaction</strong> and someselected attributes <strong>of</strong> Airtel.Materials and MethodThe users <strong>of</strong> Airtel were <strong>the</strong> population <strong>of</strong> this study. The study wasdescriptive in nature. This study was mainly based on primary data that werecollected by questionnaires and secondary data that were collected fromjournal, books, website etc. Some data and o<strong>the</strong>r necessary information werecollected by interviewing <strong>of</strong>ficials <strong>of</strong> Airtel.Simple random sampling technique was used for collection <strong>of</strong> primarydata. This study included 120 respondents as <strong>the</strong> sample. Out <strong>of</strong> 120 respondents,15 were executives, 50 were business men, 20 were homemaker and 35 werestudents. The respondents had been chosen from <strong>the</strong> different divisions <strong>of</strong>Bangladesh on random basis. The data were analysed by statistical tools like SD,mean, coefficient <strong>of</strong> correlation etc. In this study <strong>the</strong> hypo<strong>the</strong>sis has been designin <strong>the</strong> following manner.Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis A:Ho: There is no relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and network facility <strong>of</strong>Airtel.H1: There is a relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and network facility <strong>of</strong> Airtel.Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis B:Ho: There is no relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and call rate <strong>of</strong> Airtel.H1: There is a relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and call rate <strong>of</strong> Airtel.Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis C:Ho: There is no relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and price <strong>of</strong> subscriberidentification module (SIM) card <strong>of</strong> Airtel.H1: There is a relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and price <strong>of</strong> SIM card <strong>of</strong>Airtel.Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis D:Ho: There is no relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and internet facilities <strong>of</strong>Airtel.H1: There is a relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and internet facilities <strong>of</strong>Airtel.Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis E:Ho: There is no relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and customer care service<strong>of</strong> Airtel.438http://www.bdresearchpublications.com/journal/


Customers’ Satisfaction <strong>of</strong> Airtel Bangladesh LimitedH1: There is a relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and customer care service<strong>of</strong> Airtel.Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis F:Ho: There is no relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and roaming rate <strong>of</strong> Airtel.H1: There is a relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and roaming rate <strong>of</strong> Airtel.Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis G:Ho: There is no relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and call quality <strong>of</strong>AirtelAirtel.H1: There is a relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and call quality <strong>of</strong> Airtel.Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis H:Ho: There is no relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and MMS (multimediamessage settings) facilities <strong>of</strong> Airtel.H1: There is a relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and MMS facilities <strong>of</strong> Airtel.Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis I:Ho: There is no relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and electronic bill (E-Bill)facilities <strong>of</strong> Airtel.H1: There is a relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and E-Bill facilities <strong>of</strong> Airtel.Hypo<strong>the</strong>sis J:Ho: There is no relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and facebook accessfacilities <strong>of</strong> Airtel.H1: There is a relation between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and facebook accessfacilities <strong>of</strong> Airtel.Result and DiscussionIt was discussed that Bharti Airtel Limited, commonly known as Airtel, is anIndian telecommunications services company headquartered at New Delhi,India. It operates in 20 countries across South Asia, Africa and <strong>the</strong> Channel Islands.Airtel has GSM network in all countries, providing 2G, 3G and 4G servicesdepending upon <strong>the</strong> country <strong>of</strong> operation. Airtel is <strong>the</strong> world's third largest mobiletelecommunications company.with over 261 million subscribers across 20countries as <strong>of</strong> August 2012.Table 1. Measuring <strong>the</strong> customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> level towards network <strong>of</strong> AirtelSatisfaction level Frequency Percentage Mean SDVery dissatisfied 0 0Somewhatdissatisfied0 0Nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor4.2167 .8519233 27.5dissatisfiedSomewhat satisfied 28 23.3Very satisfied 59 49.2Total 120 100.0Table 1 showed that, 27.5% were nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor dissatisfied, 23.3% weresomewhat satisfied and 49.2% were highly satisfied towards network <strong>of</strong> Airtel, andits average value was 4.21 which lied on somewhat satisfied level, The standarddeviation <strong>of</strong> this statement is 0.85 which is less than 1 that means data points inevery series are very close <strong>the</strong> mean.439http://www.bdresearchpublications.com/journal/


Hossain et al.Table 2. Measuring <strong>the</strong> customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> level towards call rate <strong>of</strong> AirtelSatisfaction level Frequency Percentage Mean SDVery dissatisfied 24 20.0Somewhatdissatisfied13 10.8Nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor3.3167 1.5228424 20.0dissatisfiedSomewhat satisfied 19 15.8Very satisfied 40 33.3Total 120 100.0Table 2 showed that, 20% Airtel users were very dissatisfied, 10.8% wassomewhat dissatisfied 20% were nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor dissatisfied, 15.8 % weresomewhat satisfied, 33.3% were very satisfied towards call rate <strong>of</strong> Airtel, and itsaverage value was 3.31 which lied on nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor dissatisfied level.Table 3. Measuring <strong>the</strong> customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> level towards price <strong>of</strong> SIM <strong>of</strong> AirtelSatisfaction level Frequency Percentage Mean SDVery dissatisfied 0Somewhatdissatisfied2 1.7Nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor4.7083 .585482 1.7dissatisfiedSomewhat satisfied 25 20.8Very satisfied 91 75.8Total 120 100.0By analyzing it was got finding that was shown in table 3 that 1.7% Airtel’sbuyers were somewhat dissatisfied, 1.7% nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor dissatisfied, 20.8%somewhat satisfied, 75.8 % very satisfied at price <strong>of</strong> <strong>airtel</strong> SIM and mean value was4.70 so customers were very satisfied toward <strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> SIM <strong>of</strong> Airtel.Table 4. Measuring <strong>the</strong> customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> level towards <strong>of</strong> internet facility <strong>of</strong>AirtelSatisfaction level Frequency Percentage Mean SDVery dissatisfied 0Somewhatdissatisfied4 3.3Nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor3.6583 .8043654 45.0dissatisfiedSomewhat satisfied 41 34.2Very satisfied 21 17.5Total 120 100.0In table 4 that 17.5% Airtel’s users were very satisfied 34.2% somewhatsatisfied, 45% nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor dissatisfied toward internet <strong>of</strong> Airtel and meanwas 3.65 so we can say customers were somewhat satisfied toward <strong>the</strong> internet <strong>of</strong>Airtel.440http://www.bdresearchpublications.com/journal/


Customers’ Satisfaction <strong>of</strong> Airtel Bangladesh LimitedTable 5. Measuring <strong>the</strong> customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> level towards customer care service<strong>of</strong> AirtelSatisfaction level Frequency Percentage Mean SDVery dissatisfied 2 1.7Somewhatdissatisfied2 1.7Nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor4.2250 .9567326 21.7dissatisfiedSomewhat satisfied 27 22.5Very satisfied 63 52.5Total 120 100.0In table 5 that 52.5% Airtel’s users were very satisfied, 22.5% somewhatsatisfied, 21.7% nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor dissatisfied, 1.7% somewhat dissatisfied toward<strong>the</strong> customer care services <strong>of</strong> Airtel and mean value is 4.22 so customer wassomewhat satisfied toward <strong>the</strong> customer care services <strong>of</strong> Airtel.Table 6. Measuring <strong>the</strong> customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> level towards roaming rate <strong>of</strong> AirtelSatisfaction level Frequency Percentage Mean SDVery dissatisfied 2 1.7Somewhatdissatisfied22 18.3Nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor3.4667 .9867529 24.2dissatisfiedSomewhat satisfied 52 43.3Very satisfied 15 12.5Total 120 100.0In table 6 that 1.7% Airtel users were very dissatisfied, 18.3% were somewhatdissatisfied, 24.2% were nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor dissatisfied, 43.3 % were somewhatsatisfied, 12.4% were very satisfied towards roaming rate <strong>of</strong> Airtel, and its averagevalue was 3.46 which lied on nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor dissatisfied level.Table 7. Measuring <strong>the</strong> customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> level towards voice call quality <strong>of</strong>AirtelSatisfaction level Frequency Percentage Mean SDVery dissatisfied 0 0Somewhatdissatisfied0 0Nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor4.3000 1.070023 19.2dissatisfiedSomewhat satisfied 38 31.7Very satisfied 59 49.2Total 120 100.0In table 7 that 49.2% Airtel’s users were very satisfied 31.7% somewhatsatisfied, 19.2% nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor dissatisfied toward voice call quality <strong>of</strong> Airteland mean was 4.30 so we can say customers were somewhat satisfied toward<strong>the</strong> voice call quality <strong>of</strong> Airtel. Since, <strong>the</strong> standard deviation is 1.07 <strong>the</strong> data arespread out over a large range <strong>of</strong> values. Though <strong>the</strong> respondents are having poorcall quality while talking over mobile; some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> respondents are having goodexperience with that.441http://www.bdresearchpublications.com/journal/


Hossain et al.Table 8. Measuring <strong>the</strong> customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> level towards MMS service <strong>of</strong> AirtelSatisfaction level Frequency Percentage Mean SDVery dissatisfied 0 0Somewhatdissatisfied1 .8Nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor4.4583 .659728 6.7dissatisfiedSomewhat satisfied 46 38.3Very satisfied 65 54.2Total 120 100.0Table 8 showed that, 6.7% were nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor dissatisfied, 38.3%were somewhat satisfied and 54.2% were highly satisfied towards MMS <strong>of</strong> Airtel,and its average value was 4.45 which lied on somewhat satisfied level, Thestandard deviation <strong>of</strong> this statement WAS 0.65 which is less than 1 that meansdata points in every series are very close <strong>the</strong> mean.Table 9. Measuring <strong>the</strong> customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> level towards E-bill <strong>of</strong> AirtelSatisfaction level Frequency Percentage Mean SDVery dissatisfied 0 0Somewhatdissatisfied4 3.3Nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor4.0667 .8274025 20.8dissatisfiedSomewhat satisfied 50 41.7Very satisfied 41 34.2Total 120 100.0In table 9 that 3.3% was somewhat dissatisfied, 20.8% were nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfiednor dissatisfied, 41.7 % were somewhat satisfied, 34.2% were very satisfied towardsE-bill <strong>of</strong> Airtel, and its average value was 4.06 which lied on somewhat satisfiedlevel.Table 10. Measuring <strong>the</strong> customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> level towards facebook SMS <strong>of</strong>AirtelSatisfaction level Frequency Percentage Mean SDVery dissatisfied 0 0Somewhatdissatisfied2 1.7Nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfied nor4.2667 .7749618 15.0dissatisfiedSomewhat satisfied 46 38.3Very satisfied 54 45.0Total 120 100.0In table 10 that 1.7% was somewhat dissatisfied, 15.0% were nei<strong>the</strong>r satisfiednor dissatisfied, 38.3 % were somewhat satisfied, 45% were very satisfied towardsSMS <strong>of</strong> Airtel, and its average value was 4.27 which lied on somewhat satisfiedlevel.442http://www.bdresearchpublications.com/journal/


Customers’ Satisfaction <strong>of</strong> Airtel Bangladesh LimitedTable 11. CorrelationsNetworkCall ratePrice <strong>of</strong>SIMInternetCustomercareCustomer<strong>satisfaction</strong>NetworkCallratePrice<strong>of</strong> SIMInternet Customercare443Customer<strong>satisfaction</strong>PearsonCorrelation1 -.027 .229(*) -.112 .301(**) .870Sig. (2-tailed).766 .012 .224 .001 .000N 120 120 120 120 120 120PearsonCorrelation-.027 1 .152 -.343(**) -.338(**) .453Sig. (2-tailed).766 .098 .000 .000 .000N 120 120 120 120 120 120PearsonCorrelation.229(*) .152 1 -.285(**) .373(**) .673Sig. (2-tailed).012 .098 .002 .000 .000N 120 120 120 120 120 120Pearson- --.112Correlation.343(**) .285(**)1 .123 .587(**)Sig. (2-tailed).224 .000 .002 .182 .000N 120 120 120 120 120 120Pearson-.301(**)Correlation.338(**).373(**) .123 1 .643(**)Sig. (2-tailed).001 .000 .000 .182 .000N 120 120 120 120 120 120PearsonCorrelation.870 .453 .673 .587(**) .643(**) 1Sig. (2-tailed).000 .000 .000 .000 .000N 120 120 120 120 120 120* Correlation is significant at <strong>the</strong> 0.05 level (2-tailed).** Correlation is significant at <strong>the</strong> 0.01 level (2-tailed).It had been shown in table 11 that <strong>the</strong> correlation coefficient (r) forcustomer <strong>satisfaction</strong> and network .870 customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> and call rate 0.453,customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> and price <strong>of</strong> SIM 0.673, customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and internetfacilities 0.587 , customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and customer care service .643 , whichwere greater than 0.000. Therefore, it can be concluded that <strong>the</strong>y were positivelyrelated with customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>. so null hypo<strong>the</strong>sis was rejected in hypo<strong>the</strong>sisA,B,C, D and E .http://www.bdresearchpublications.com/journal/


Hossain et al.Table 12. CorrelationsRoamingrateVoice callqualityMMSE BillFacebookSMSCustomer<strong>satisfaction</strong>http://www.bdresearchpublications.com/journal/RoamingrateVoicecallqualityMMS E Bill FacebookSMS444Customer<strong>satisfaction</strong>PearsonCorrelation1 -.163 .030 -.080 -.021 .524(*)Sig. (2-tailed).075 .744 .387 .818 .000N 120 120 120 120 120 120PearsonCorrelation-.163 1 .469(**) -.032 .258(**) .980(**)Sig. (2-tailed).075 .000 .733 .004 .001N 120 120 120 120 120 120PearsonCorrelation.030 .469(**) 1 -.041 .433(**) .850(*)Sig. (2-tailed).744 .000 .656 .000 .000N 120 120 120 120 120 120PearsonCorrelation-.080 -.032 -.041 1 -.002 .340(**)Sig. (2-tailed).387 .733 .656 .985 .000N 120 120 120 120 120 120PearsonCorrelation-.021 .258(**) .433(**) -.002 1 .736Sig. (2-tailed).818 .004 .000 .985 .000N 120 120 120 120 120 120PearsonCorrelation.524(*) .980(**) .850(*) .340(**) .736 1Sig. (2-tailed).000 .001 .000 .000 .000N 120 120 120 120 120 120* Correlation is significant at <strong>the</strong> 0.05 level (2-tailed).** Correlation is significant at <strong>the</strong> 0.01 level (2-tailed).Table 12 showed that <strong>the</strong> correlation coefficient (r) for customer<strong>satisfaction</strong> and roaming rate .524, customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> and voice call quality0.980, customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> and MMS 0.850, customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and E bill 0.340, customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>s and facebook sms service .736 , which were greater than0.000. Therefore, it can be concluded that <strong>the</strong>y were positively related withcustomer <strong>satisfaction</strong>. so null hypo<strong>the</strong>sis was rejected in hypo<strong>the</strong>sis F,G,H, I and J .ConclusionAirtel is a telecom service providing company where customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>is both goal and marketing tool. Today’s customers in <strong>the</strong> telecom industry, wherelots <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fers are available, are harder to satisfy. They are smarter, more priceconscious, more demanding, less forgiving and <strong>the</strong>y are approached by manymore companies with equal or better <strong>of</strong>fers. The challenge is not only to producesatisfied customers also to produce loyal and delighted customer. This iscompetitive and customer driven market. It is high time for Airtel to satisfy andretain its existing customers. As <strong>the</strong> mobile connection price, call charge, even<strong>the</strong> price <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> handset have been reduced due to technological advancementpeople <strong>of</strong> all income level are started using cell phone. Nowadays, most <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>


Customers’ Satisfaction <strong>of</strong> Airtel Bangladesh Limitedstudents and <strong>the</strong> low income people are deeply relying on Airtel because <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>cheap cost. Hence, it has become inevitable for Airtel to expand <strong>the</strong> networkcoverage soon for a sustainable future.ReferencesMalhotra, Naresh K.; Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation; PP-203-235 , 5thEdition; Prentice-Hall <strong>of</strong> India; 2011Kotler, Philip & Keller, Kevin L.; Marketing Management; PP-132-135, 13th Edition;Pearson Education (India); 2010Sureshchandar, G. S., Rajendran, C., and Anantharaman, R. N. (2002).Determinants <strong>of</strong> customer-perceived service quality: A confirmatory factoranalysis approach. The Journal <strong>of</strong> Services Marketing, 16(1), 9-34.Surprenant, C., and Churchill, G. (1982). An investigation into <strong>the</strong> determinants <strong>of</strong>customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>. Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing Research, 19(4), 491.Tariq, A. N., and Moussaoui, N. (2009). The main antecedents <strong>of</strong> customer loyaltyin Moroccan telecommunication industry. International Journal <strong>of</strong> Businessand Management Science, 2(2), 101-115.Terblanche, N. S. (2006). The relationship between customer <strong>satisfaction</strong> andloyalty: an application <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>American Customer Satisfaction Index in <strong>the</strong> South African fast food industry.Management Dynamics, 15(2), 31-42.Walsh, G., Groth, M., and Wiedmann, K.P. (2005). An examination <strong>of</strong> consumers’motives to switch energy suppliers. Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing Management,21(special issue), 421 440.Welkowitz, J., Cohen, B.H., and Ewen, R.B. (2006). Introductory Statistics for <strong>the</strong>Behavioural Sciences. 6th ed. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.Anderson TW and Olsen LL. 2008. The impact <strong>of</strong> customers’ perception <strong>of</strong> varyingdegrees <strong>of</strong> customer service on commitment and perceived relativeattractiveness. Managing Service Quality. Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics andManagement, NY. 12: 309-328.Hasan N. 2001. Productivity gowth In <strong>the</strong> mobile telecommunication industry inBangladesh. Journal <strong>of</strong> Economics and Management, NY. 12: 78-103.Jacobson R and Aaker DA. 2003. The growth <strong>of</strong> telecommunication industry inAsia. Journal <strong>of</strong> Marketing Research. UK 51: 31-44.Kotler P. 2006: Some cautions in measuring customer <strong>satisfaction</strong>.(Six<strong>the</strong>dition)pp.305-339.Olshavsky RW. 1985. Perceived quality in consumer decision making: anintegrated <strong>the</strong>oretical perspective in perceived quality. pp. 75-178.Jones, T., & Sasser, W.E (1995). Why satisfied customers defect. Harvard BusinessReview, 73, 88-99.Palmer, A. (1998), “Principles <strong>of</strong> Services Marketing”, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, NewYork, NY.Reichheld FF (1996). Learning from Customer Defections. Harv. Bus. Rev.March/April. pp. 56-69.Yi, Y. (1990). A critical review <strong>of</strong> consumer <strong>satisfaction</strong>. In V. Zethiaml (Ed), Review<strong>of</strong> marketing (pp. 68-123). Chicago: American marketing Association.445http://www.bdresearchpublications.com/journal/

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!