30.07.2015 Views

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need for family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g is similar <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>both countries, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir fertility circumstances are completelydifferent. In Solom<strong>on</strong> Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>traceptive prevalencerate is 27 per cent (Table 4), whereas <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> United States itis 69 per cent. Similarly, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total fertility rate <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Solom<strong>on</strong>Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s is 4.6, whereas <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> United States it is 2.1.In ano<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r respect <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two countries are similar, whichis to be expected, given <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> similar level of unmet need:<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> United States, 89 per cent of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> forfamily plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g is met; <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Solom<strong>on</strong> Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s, 76 per centof <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> for family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g is met (Table 8). Theproporti<strong>on</strong> of dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> met <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> two countries is roughlysimilar because, although <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong> of womenof childbear<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g age who wish to limit births is muchhigher <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> United States than <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Solom<strong>on</strong> Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s, ahigh proporti<strong>on</strong> of those women are able to meet <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>irc<strong>on</strong>traceptive needs. In Solom<strong>on</strong> Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s, a much smallerproporti<strong>on</strong> of women of childbear<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g age wish to regulate<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir childbear<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g, but a similar proporti<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se womenis also able to meet <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir c<strong>on</strong>traceptive needs.The implicati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se c<strong>on</strong>siderati<strong>on</strong>s is that statistics<strong>on</strong> unmet need must be <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terpreted with cauti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> used<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> comb<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong> with o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r measures of dem<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> for familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g services.TableTable7VariablePercentage of currently married women (15-49 years of age) with an unmet need for familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> selected <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g> isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> countries, by socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic characteristics*Tuvalu2007Nauru2007Marshall Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s2007Solom<strong>on</strong> Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s2007Samoa 2009Kiribati2008Papua NewGu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea2006‡Age group15-19 -- -- 33.2 15.0 -- 36.5 29.520-24 23.8 36.6 12.5 14.8 41.5 30.5 29.825-29 22.2 31.1 9.3 15.3 41.9 26.3 37.730-34 30.9 23.7 7.6 15.1 41.5 32.2 42.235-39 23.7 17.5 2.8 8.5 46.4 26.6 48.040-44 24.3 -- 1.4 2.3 46.2 29.7 61.445-49 20.2 -- 0.0 0.7 53.8 19.5 76.815-49 24.2 23.5 8.1 7.7 45.6 28.2 44.1ResidenceUrban 25.5 na 7.3 8.2 45.4 31.3 42.1Rural 23.1 na 9.6 11.6 45.6 25.3 44.3Educati<strong>on</strong>No educati<strong>on</strong> na na na 12.1 na 0.0 51.4Primary or less 20.5 na 9.0 11.6 54.8 25.5 43.5Sec<strong>on</strong>dary 27.6 23.5 7.6 10.1 45.4 30.3 30.0More than sec<strong>on</strong>dary+ 22.9 -- 8.9 3.0 43.2 26.2 naWealthQu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tile 1 (highest) 22.6 27.6 6.2 6.0 41.4 31.0 naQu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tile 2 25.8 19.3 4.6 9.8 43.6 31.5 naQu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tile 3 26.2 31.1 9.1 15.4 48.1 26.6 naQu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tile 4 22.7 20.8 11.1 10.4 47.7 26.9 naQu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tile 5 (lowest) 23.3 17.2 14.1 14.5 46.8 24.4 naSource: DHS reports for specified countries.*Note that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> method of estimat<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g unmet need <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Papua New Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea is not identical to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> method used <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r countries.In Papua New Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> figures refer to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need for stopp<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> not spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. Also, some o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r categories of unmet needare excluded. The Papua New Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea figures are <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore underestimates when compared with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r countries. In all o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rcountries, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> figures given are <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sum of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need for spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need for stopp<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g.‡Women who are undecided as to whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y want ano<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r child or resp<strong>on</strong>ded “d<strong>on</strong>’t know” are c<strong>on</strong>sidered to have an unmet needfor c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Papua New Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea. If <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se women are excluded, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong> of women with an unmet need is much lower(29.8%)87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!