30.07.2015 Views

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

esp<strong>on</strong>sible for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programme, a familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g cl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ic was opened <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number of familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g acceptors <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased over time (Ivarature, 2000).The <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tegrati<strong>on</strong> of family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programmes withmaternal <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> child health programmes occurred around1968 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tributed to high levels of acceptors be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>greported. The formati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> T<strong>on</strong>ga <str<strong>on</strong>g>Family</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g</str<strong>on</strong>g>Associati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1969 fur<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r streng<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ned advocacy forfamily plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1970s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1980s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>clusi<strong>on</strong> offamily plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al development plans heightened<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> commitment to family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. In 1976, a surveyreported that 45.7 per cent of all women of reproductiveage were us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong>, with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> highest level of 63.3per cent be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g recorded <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kol<strong>on</strong>ga, T<strong>on</strong>gatapu. The surveyrevealed that acceptors were young, were us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g highlyeffective c<strong>on</strong>traceptive methods <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> had fewer children<strong>on</strong>ce <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y adopted family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g (Ivarature, 2000)(ref ).In Kiribati, family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g was <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>itiated <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1960s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g campaign was officially launched <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>1968 (Tesfaghiorghis, 1995). While fertility decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>all age groups between <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1960s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1990s, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> pace ofdecl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e was much slower after 1973, c<strong>on</strong>comitant with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>wan<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programme (Booth, 1994).In 1972, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> percentage of family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g users am<strong>on</strong>gwomen of reproductive age was 40.1 per cent. However,<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re was significant oppositi<strong>on</strong> to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gprogramme, particularly from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Catholic Church <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>traditi<strong>on</strong>al leaders. The family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programmestalled <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1970s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> percentage of users droppedto 15.8 per cent. By 1990, CPR was approximately 27 percent, a level which fell short of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al target of 35 percent. The relatively high percentage of users <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectables(60%) was noted <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1980s but with time, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> ovulati<strong>on</strong>method became <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> more frequently used method <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>use of <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectables decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed to 39 per cent. Fertility studieshave found significant religious <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> geographic variati<strong>on</strong>swith higher fertility rates <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> outer isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> am<strong>on</strong>gCatholics. The geographic differences <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> fertility reflectedmostly <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> religious compositi<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. Higherfertility rates were also noted am<strong>on</strong>g women with lowereducati<strong>on</strong>.O<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r countries <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g> also <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>itiated familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programmes with modest success (Keny<strong>on</strong><str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Power, 2003). The Federated States of Micr<strong>on</strong>esia,Marshall Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s, Papua New Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea, Solom<strong>on</strong> Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Vanuatu – all c<strong>on</strong>sidered as hav<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g high fertility <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>some of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> atolls as hav<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g high populati<strong>on</strong> densities–showed some decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> fertility (Pirie, 1994). Negativereacti<strong>on</strong>s, however, <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> part fuelled by fear of side effects,were often reported by women. Papua New Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>Solom<strong>on</strong> Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s adopted populati<strong>on</strong> policies aimed atfertility reducti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> early 1990s, but data <strong>on</strong> patternsof c<strong>on</strong>traceptive use over time rema<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> limited <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>secountries <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir success is unclear.Follow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1994 ICPD, st<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>-al<strong>on</strong>e family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gprogrammes were given lower priority worldwide whilecountries established more <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tegrated <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> comprehensiveapproaches to reproductive health. This occurred <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g> as well. The effort to c<strong>on</strong>struct an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tegratedreproductive health strategy that <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>cluded young, unmarriedpeople <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> moved away from an MCH approach absorbedenergy <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> resources <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> process weakened familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. Globally, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> some <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g> isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> countries,funds <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> human resources were diverted to fight <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> HIV<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> AIDS epidemic 11 . However, family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g had alsoreceived setbacks <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1970s <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1980s when <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> abusesassociated with forced sterilizati<strong>on</strong>, defective IUDs <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>l<strong>on</strong>g-act<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g horm<strong>on</strong>al c<strong>on</strong>traceptives became well known.The rise of religious <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> political c<strong>on</strong>servatism <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>unwill<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gness to acknowledge <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> role that universal accessto voluntary family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g could play <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> reduc<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g poverty<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>equality were also c<strong>on</strong>tribut<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g factors.While <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact of family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programmes <strong>on</strong>fertility rates has been highly significant <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> many <str<strong>on</strong>g>Asia</str<strong>on</strong>g>ncountries, possibly exceed<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact of such socioec<strong>on</strong>omicfactors as ris<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>come (Bloom et al., 2002),<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> situati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g> is more complex. Despite <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>existence of virtually free, government-run, voluntary familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g programmes, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> utilizati<strong>on</strong> of safe <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> effectivevoluntary c<strong>on</strong>traceptive services based <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formed choice<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a wide range of opti<strong>on</strong>s, rema<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>s well below potential(Roberts<strong>on</strong>, 2007) 12 .Before review<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ants offertility change at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> macrolevel that may have c<strong>on</strong>tributedto <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> slow or stalled fertility transiti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> some <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g>isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> countries, it may be <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>structive to look at patternsof c<strong>on</strong>traceptive use <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ants as evident <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>recent DHS.Current patterns of c<strong>on</strong>traceptiveuse <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet needCurrent use of c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>trends at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al levelC<strong>on</strong>traceptive prevalenceWith 7 of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 15 <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g> isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> countries <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> territorieswith United Nati<strong>on</strong>s programmes hav<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g had a DHSwith<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> past 5 years, it is now possible to comparec<strong>on</strong>traceptive prevalence rates across those ec<strong>on</strong>omieswithout recourse to <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>complete service statistics <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gcomparable methodology. The figures <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Table 4 show thatCPR for currently married women <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> period 2005-2009 ranges from a low of 17 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Palau to a highof 46 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Cook Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s. The territories at each75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!