30.07.2015 Views

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

FigureTableTable3Trends <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>traceptive prevalence am<strong>on</strong>g childbear<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g aged women <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> uni<strong>on</strong> by wealth qu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tile<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dices: <str<strong>on</strong>g>Asia</str<strong>on</strong>g>n Demographic <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Health Surveys 1992-2008Country <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> YearQu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tilesPopulati<strong>on</strong>Low 2nd 3rd 4th High AverageCIBangladesh 1996/1997 38.8 40.8 43.7 38.8 48.5 42.1 0.044Bangladesh 1999/2000 37.4 43.7 44.8 43.5 50.2 44.0 0.057Bangladesh 2004 44.7 47.7 46.6 47.4 50.0 47.3 0.025Bangladesh 2007 54.8 54.7 54.1 55.2 59.9 55.8 0.021Cambodia 2000 12.5 15.4 20.1 19.9 25.4 18.8 0.162Cambodia 2005 30.7 34.3 38.7 41.3 54.0 40.0 0.007India 1992/1993 24.9 27.5 36.1 42.0 50.6 56.5 0.145India 1998/1999 29.3 34.9 44.9 49.7 54.6 42.6 0.129India 2005/2006 42.2 51.1 46.8 62.5 67.5 64.0 0.060Ind<strong>on</strong>esia 1997 46.2 55.6 56.9 58.0 56.9 54.7 0.060Ind<strong>on</strong>esia 2002/2003 48.6 57.9 60.0 59.3 58.1 56.7 0.032Ind<strong>on</strong>esia 2007 53.0 63.3 62.4 63.8 63.5 61.4 0.028Nepal 1992/1993 15.7 21.2 23.2 26.6 44.9 26.0 0.209Nepal 2001 23.8 28.7 31.7 38.9 55.2 35.4 0.180Nepal 2006 32.9 42.6 49.2 52.8 60.9 48.0 0.109Philipp<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>es 1998 19.6 26.2 33.0 33.0 29.4 28.2 0.115Philipp<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>es 2003 23.8 33.8 35.7 37.9 35.2 33.4 0.072Philipp<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>es 2008 40.8 52.7 54.0 55.8 50.0 50.7 0.052Vietnam 1997 47.0 57.3 59.3 59.4 55.5 55.8 0.014Vietnam 2002 57.9 57.9 58.1 58.0 51.6 56.7 -0.025Note: A c<strong>on</strong>centrati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dex value of zero (0) <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicates no <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>come-related <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>equality.Figure3 C<strong>on</strong>traceptive prevalence by wealth qu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tile: Ind<strong>on</strong>esia 1997, 2002, 2007Source: United Nati<strong>on</strong>s, World Populati<strong>on</strong> Policies 200952

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!