Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
married or <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> uni<strong>on</strong>. Women with anunmet need are those who are fecund<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sexually active but are not us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g anymethod of c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong>, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> report notwant<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g any more children or want<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gto delay <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> birth of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir next child(UNDESA, 2009).This def<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>iti<strong>on</strong> is identical to that used <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> DHS. Themethod of computati<strong>on</strong> requires that surveys identifywomen who are married or <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> a sexual uni<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> variousstatuses requir<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g a complex branch<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g process basedup<strong>on</strong> answers to questi<strong>on</strong>s appear<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g at various po<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ts of<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> DHS questi<strong>on</strong>naire.Women who are excluded from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> numerator <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>cludethose who:(a) Are us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong> to delay <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir next birth;(b) Are us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong> to stop childbear<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g;(c) Are currently pregnant or amenorrhoeic <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>pregnancy was:(i) Intended, or(ii) Due to a method failure;(d) Are <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>fecund (accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to an objective set ofcriteria);(e) Want a child with<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> next two years.By a process of elim<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ati<strong>on</strong>, a residual is obta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed that<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>cludes women who:(a) Are not us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong>;(b) Are not pregnant or amenorrhoeic;(c) Do not want ano<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r child or do not want it with<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>next two years;(d) Are pregnant or amenorrhoeic <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>(i) Did not want <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> child;(ii) Wanted <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> child but at a later date;(e) Are unsure about want<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g a child at a later date.The denom<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ator is all women who are married or <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> asexual uni<strong>on</strong>. 10The def<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>iti<strong>on</strong> of unmet need employed by variousanalysts is not always c<strong>on</strong>sistent with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> DHS def<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>iti<strong>on</strong>,ei<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> terms of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> numerator or <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> denom<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ator orboth. For example, women who are unsure or “d<strong>on</strong>’t know”whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y want ano<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r child can be c<strong>on</strong>sidered bysome analysts to have an unmet need, whereas o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rswould exclude <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m. Burd<strong>on</strong> et al. (2002) reported thatunmet need for family plann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g based <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1996 DHSwas 62 per cent for currently married women. However,this percentage was not calculated us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ternati<strong>on</strong>alst<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>ard formula <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore not comparable withunmet need <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r countries. 11Papua New Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea is <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>ly <str<strong>on</strong>g>Pacific</str<strong>on</strong>g> isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> country tohave two comparable measures of unmet need (1996 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>2006), thus enabl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> analysis of trends over time.However, Papua New Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea’s DHS tables do not show<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need for spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g separately from <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet needfor stopp<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. Women are c<strong>on</strong>sidered to have an unmetneed if <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y say that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y want no more children (or arenot sure or undecided) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> are not us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong>.It is possible that total unmet need as measured by DHSwould be higher if <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need for spac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g were to becalculated separately <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>cluded <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total.Table 11 shows that, while a decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need isevident at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al level (from 45.9 to 43.9%) over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>decade 1996-2006, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> rate of decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e was slow <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmetneed rema<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed quite high. In <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s regi<strong>on</strong>, however,unmet need actually <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased over <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> period, while <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>Highl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s regi<strong>on</strong> it rema<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same level. In 2006<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Sou<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>rn regi<strong>on</strong> had <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lowest level of unmet need, aswas also <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> case <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1996.Expla<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g patterns of unmet needGeographical variati<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmet need are predom<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>antlyreflecti<strong>on</strong>s of socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic, socio-cultural <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> historicalfactors. As previously noted, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s regi<strong>on</strong> has a largeproporti<strong>on</strong> of Catholics <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> this probably expla<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g trend <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> use of modern methods of familyplann<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> that regi<strong>on</strong>. It is notable that it is <strong>on</strong>ly <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>Isl<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s regi<strong>on</strong> that unmet need <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creased between 1996<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006 (Table 11) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> it is likely that this is due toefforts by <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Catholic Church to discourage <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> use ofmodern c<strong>on</strong>tracepti<strong>on</strong> (Burd<strong>on</strong> et al., 2002).A valid explanati<strong>on</strong> of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> socio-ec<strong>on</strong>omic <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> socioculturaldeterm<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ants of unmet need would require amultivariate analysis that allowed for some variables, suchas educati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> labour force status, to be c<strong>on</strong>trolled.Published tables do not permit such analysis <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> PapuaNew Gu<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ea case <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <strong>on</strong>ly two-way descriptive analysis ispossible. The <strong>on</strong>ly variables available aside from regi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>rural/urban residence are age <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> educati<strong>on</strong>.As is evident from Table 12, unmet need rises with age<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> falls with educati<strong>on</strong>al achievement. This pattern wasevident <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> both 1996 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006. The highest level of unmet362