Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
populati<strong>on</strong> size, with just 336,000 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>habitants, or 0.6 percent of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total populati<strong>on</strong>.The sex ratio is 98.9 males per 100 females at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>allevel; however, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are variati<strong>on</strong>s am<strong>on</strong>g states <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>divisi<strong>on</strong>s, rang<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g from over 100 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kayah, Bago, M<strong>on</strong>,Shan <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ayeyarwady to 95 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ch<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Sex ratios exceed<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g100 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> five above-menti<strong>on</strong>ed areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicate that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>yhave an excess of males, which is probably due to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> factthat <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se areas offer favourable employment opportunities<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore attract male <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ternal migrants. The sex ratiois a proxy <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicator show<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> absence of sex selectiveaborti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>fanticide. Myanmar has an impartialattitude towards sex preference, at least as reflected <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>number of males vis-à-vis females. Data <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> estimatedpopulati<strong>on</strong> by regi<strong>on</strong>, density <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sex ratio are given <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>Table 1.FertilityIn Myanmar, fertility has been decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. The crude birthrate (CBR) has decreased from 34.8 births per 1,000populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1983 to 17.3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006; fertility halved dur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gthose decades, with fertility decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e between 2001 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>2006 be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g about 30 per cent, accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to various reportsof <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Fertility <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Reproductive Health Survey (FRHS).The Nati<strong>on</strong>wide Cause-specific Maternal Mortality Survey(2004-2005) revealed that CBR was close to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006rates (18.4 at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al level; 15.7 for urban <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 19.5 forrural areas). The rates for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al level as <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicated by<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> vital registrati<strong>on</strong> system also showed a decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g trend,but at somewhat higher levels. Urban, rural <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> regi<strong>on</strong>alvariati<strong>on</strong>s exist; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban-rural differential is about 2,with urban CBR be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g less than rural. The 2007 FRHSshowed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lowest CBR of 15 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> M<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>alay Divisi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> highest CBR of 22 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Rakh<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e State (see Figures 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>2). 7The total fertility rate (TFR) was 4.7 children per woman<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1983; it decreased to 3.5 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1991 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2.0 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006,accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1983 census, 1991 Populati<strong>on</strong> Changes<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Fertility Survey (PCFS) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2007 FRHS. TFR decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1983 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006 was about 43 per cent, or 1.8 per centper annum. Urban <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural differences exist. Women <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>rural areas have two to three children <strong>on</strong> average, whereaswomen <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban areas have fewer than two children. Withregard to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> regi<strong>on</strong>al differential, it follows <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same trendas CBR, with M<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>alay hav<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lowest TFR (1.7) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>Rakh<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e State hav<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> highest (2.9) 8 .TableTable1Populati<strong>on</strong>, density <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sex ratio for 2009-2010SNState/ Divisi<strong>on</strong>= StatesPopulati<strong>on</strong> (<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> thous<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s)Total Males FemalesDensity (Per sqkm)Sex RatioUni<strong>on</strong> 59130 29400 29730 87 98.91 Kach<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1560 771 789 17 97.82 Kayah 351 178 173 29 102.73 Kay<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1794 888 906 60 98.04 Ch<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 545 266 279 14 95.25 M<strong>on</strong> 3106 1560 1546 253 100.86 Rakh<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e 3271 1630 1641 89 99.37 Shan 5594 2803 2791 36 100.4Divisi<strong>on</strong>s8 Saga<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g 6479 3184 3295 69 96.69 Tan<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tharyi 1691 844 847 38 99.510 Bago 5944 2988 2956 150 101.111 Magway 5564 2738 2826 124 96.912 M<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>alay 8333 4118 4215 178 97.713 Yang<strong>on</strong> 6944 3447 3497 683 98.614 Ayeyarwady 7952 3984 3968 227 100.4Source: Department of Populati<strong>on</strong>. Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar, 2010* Calculated based <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> data from Department of Populati<strong>on</strong>264