30.07.2015 Views

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

populati<strong>on</strong> size, with just 336,000 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>habitants, or 0.6 percent of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> total populati<strong>on</strong>.The sex ratio is 98.9 males per 100 females at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>allevel; however, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>re are variati<strong>on</strong>s am<strong>on</strong>g states <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>divisi<strong>on</strong>s, rang<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g from over 100 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Kayah, Bago, M<strong>on</strong>,Shan <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ayeyarwady to 95 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ch<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>. Sex ratios exceed<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g100 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> five above-menti<strong>on</strong>ed areas <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicate that <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>yhave an excess of males, which is probably due to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> factthat <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>se areas offer favourable employment opportunities<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>refore attract male <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ternal migrants. The sex ratiois a proxy <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicator show<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> absence of sex selectiveaborti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>fanticide. Myanmar has an impartialattitude towards sex preference, at least as reflected <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>number of males vis-à-vis females. Data <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> estimatedpopulati<strong>on</strong> by regi<strong>on</strong>, density <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sex ratio are given <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>Table 1.FertilityIn Myanmar, fertility has been decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g. The crude birthrate (CBR) has decreased from 34.8 births per 1,000populati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1983 to 17.3 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006; fertility halved dur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gthose decades, with fertility decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e between 2001 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>2006 be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g about 30 per cent, accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to various reportsof <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> Fertility <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Reproductive Health Survey (FRHS).The Nati<strong>on</strong>wide Cause-specific Maternal Mortality Survey(2004-2005) revealed that CBR was close to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006rates (18.4 at <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al level; 15.7 for urban <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 19.5 forrural areas). The rates for <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> nati<strong>on</strong>al level as <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicated by<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> vital registrati<strong>on</strong> system also showed a decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g trend,but at somewhat higher levels. Urban, rural <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> regi<strong>on</strong>alvariati<strong>on</strong>s exist; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban-rural differential is about 2,with urban CBR be<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g less than rural. The 2007 FRHSshowed <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lowest CBR of 15 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> M<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>alay Divisi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g><str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> highest CBR of 22 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> Rakh<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e State (see Figures 1 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>2). 7The total fertility rate (TFR) was 4.7 children per woman<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1983; it decreased to 3.5 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1991 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2.0 <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006,accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1983 census, 1991 Populati<strong>on</strong> Changes<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Fertility Survey (PCFS) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2007 FRHS. TFR decl<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1983 <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2006 was about 43 per cent, or 1.8 per centper annum. Urban <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> rural differences exist. Women <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>rural areas have two to three children <strong>on</strong> average, whereaswomen <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> urban areas have fewer than two children. Withregard to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> regi<strong>on</strong>al differential, it follows <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> same trendas CBR, with M<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>alay hav<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> lowest TFR (1.7) <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>Rakh<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e State hav<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> highest (2.9) 8 .TableTable1Populati<strong>on</strong>, density <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> sex ratio for 2009-2010SNState/ Divisi<strong>on</strong>= StatesPopulati<strong>on</strong> (<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> thous<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>s)Total Males FemalesDensity (Per sqkm)Sex RatioUni<strong>on</strong> 59130 29400 29730 87 98.91 Kach<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1560 771 789 17 97.82 Kayah 351 178 173 29 102.73 Kay<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 1794 888 906 60 98.04 Ch<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 545 266 279 14 95.25 M<strong>on</strong> 3106 1560 1546 253 100.86 Rakh<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e 3271 1630 1641 89 99.37 Shan 5594 2803 2791 36 100.4Divisi<strong>on</strong>s8 Saga<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g 6479 3184 3295 69 96.69 Tan<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tharyi 1691 844 847 38 99.510 Bago 5944 2988 2956 150 101.111 Magway 5564 2738 2826 124 96.912 M<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g>alay 8333 4118 4215 178 97.713 Yang<strong>on</strong> 6944 3447 3497 683 98.614 Ayeyarwady 7952 3984 3968 227 100.4Source: Department of Populati<strong>on</strong>. Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar, 2010* Calculated based <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> data from Department of Populati<strong>on</strong>264

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!