Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ... Family Planning in Asia and the Pacific - International Council on ...
Figureeconomic growth dur
Figurebut rema
- Page 188 and 189: is provider bias that such methods
- Page 190 and 191: TableTable7skewed distribution of h
- Page 192 and 193: TableTable8TableTable9182
- Page 194 and 195: that of the nation
- Page 196 and 197: TableTable12 7some policies that ex
- Page 198 and 199: The system guides the</stro
- Page 200 and 201: FigureFigure4Total donor expenditur
- Page 202 and 203: FigureFigureagain
- Page 204 and 205: Impact of family plannin</s
- Page 206 and 207: marketing of contr
- Page 208 and 209: United States Agency for In
- Page 210 and 211: 200
- Page 212 and 213: acceptable. From an NGO perspective
- Page 214 and 215: FigureThis trend of limited donor f
- Page 216 and 217: Figureto have the
- Page 218 and 219: FigureFigure5Percentage change <str
- Page 220 and 221: FigureFigure6Desire to limit childb
- Page 222 and 223: coordination betwe
- Page 224 and 225: the 1980s
- Page 226 and 227: Policy Management.__________ (n.d.,
- Page 228 and 229: 218
- Page 230 and 231: Population Activities (UNFPA) for a
- Page 232 and 233: where family plannin</stron
- Page 234 and 235: Thus an objective assessment of <st
- Page 236 and 237: 226
- Page 240 and 241: TableTable1TableTable2For spac<stro
- Page 242 and 243: eflect a provider bias (e.g., <stro
- Page 244 and 245: The Indonesian delegation was very
- Page 246 and 247: than in ensur<stro
- Page 248 and 249: in-country <strong
- Page 250 and 251: (Ministry of Healt
- Page 252 and 253: 242
- Page 254 and 255: 244
- Page 256 and 257: FigureTrends and p
- Page 258 and 259: TableTable3Unmet need for contracep
- Page 260 and 261: TableTable5TableTable6TableTable725
- Page 262 and 263: TableTable8TableTable9Malaysia, abo
- Page 264 and 265: previously mentioned is based on fo
- Page 266 and 267: TableTable16births and</str
- Page 268 and 269: FigureFigure3TRF54.5Scatter plots o
- Page 270 and 271: ReferencesAng, Eng Suan (2007). Stu
- Page 272 and 273: Demographic data sheet: population
- Page 274 and 275: population size, with just 336,000
- Page 276 and 277: NuptialityIn Myanmar nuptiality is
- Page 278 and 279: FigureIn Myanmar, birth-spac<strong
- Page 280 and 281: Scope of coverage and</stro
- Page 282 and 283: FigureIn Myanmar, out of six select
- Page 284 and 285: equirements. The Min</stron
- Page 286 and 287: according to <stro
Figurebut rema<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed about 9 per cent dur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> period 1997-2007 (see Table 2). In absolute terms <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> number ofcurrently married women 15-49 years of age with unmetneed c<strong>on</strong>t<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ued to <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>crease. In short, <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> plateau<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g ofCPR around 60 per cent was not c<strong>on</strong>sistent with <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>government’s stated policy objective of ensur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g that FPservices would be available to all married couples wh<strong>on</strong>eeded <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m. 5Method choiceEven if changes <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> CPR are currently slow this does notmean that FP is static. There are strik<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g trends <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> methodmix, especially <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>creas<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g reliance <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>jectables <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> a shiftaway from IUDs (see Table 3). By 2007, 45.0 per cent of allcurrently married women were us<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g short-term horm<strong>on</strong>almethods, or more than two thirds of those practis<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g FP.Sterilizati<strong>on</strong> meanwhile rema<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>ed below 5 per cent.These trends <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> method mix warrant attenti<strong>on</strong>. Although<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> medical evidence overwhelm<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gly suggests that lowdosemodern horm<strong>on</strong>al methods pose no serious healthrisk (except for those with c<strong>on</strong>tra<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>dicati<strong>on</strong>s), some healthpractiti<strong>on</strong>ers still cauti<strong>on</strong> whe<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r it is wise for a womanto take horm<strong>on</strong>es for decades, especially when o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r n<strong>on</strong>horm<strong>on</strong>all<strong>on</strong>g-term methods are available. 6 Sec<strong>on</strong>d, someFP programme experts (e.g., Ross, 2003) argue that itmay be additi<strong>on</strong>ally difficult to reach <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> high levels ofCPR needed to atta<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> l<strong>on</strong>g-term populati<strong>on</strong> stabilizati<strong>on</strong>if a programme relies heavily <strong>on</strong> short-term “resupplymethods” because of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> “churn<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g effect” am<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>programme’s clients. A programme that depends heavily<strong>on</strong> short-term methods requir<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g c<strong>on</strong>stant resupply isespecially vulnerable to disrupti<strong>on</strong> dur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g turbulent times(e.g., dur<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g a transiti<strong>on</strong> to decentralizati<strong>on</strong>). A programmewith more clients <strong>on</strong> l<strong>on</strong>g-term methods can focus moreattenti<strong>on</strong> <strong>on</strong> reach<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g those couples who still have unmetneed.Adolescents <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> unmarriedO<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r significant trends <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> FP programme must resp<strong>on</strong>dto c<strong>on</strong>cern about chang<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g patterns <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> family formati<strong>on</strong>. At<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> time of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2000 populati<strong>on</strong> census almost <strong>on</strong>e thirdof all women aged 15-49 (32.9% of that age group, or 18.5milli<strong>on</strong> women) were not currently married. Table 4 shows<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sharp rise <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> percentage never married for females<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> age groups under age 30. For both sexes, 92 per cent ofall young people aged 15-19 were s<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gle <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2000; <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> figurewas 58 per cent for those aged 20-24. Most (84%) youngpeople aged 10-24 have never been married.Accord<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g to <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> 2002/03 DHS, am<strong>on</strong>g women currently25-29 years old <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> median age at first marriage was 20.2years, compared with 17.9 years reported by womencurrently 45-49. Am<strong>on</strong>g women currently aged 20-24,<strong>on</strong>ly 4 of 10 were married by age 20, while for thosecurrently aged 45-49, 7 of 10 were married by age 20.Urban women marry later than rural women, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> thosewith more educati<strong>on</strong> marry later than those with less. Themedian age at first marriage am<strong>on</strong>g women currently aged25-29 who have some educati<strong>on</strong> above <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> sec<strong>on</strong>dary levelis 23.9 years.The l<strong>on</strong>g <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>terval comm<strong>on</strong> nowadays between puberty<str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> marriage represents an <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>tensely challeng<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g period<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> development of a young pers<strong>on</strong>’s life, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g> wayshe or he deals with that period helps to determ<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>e her orhis future life chances <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> adult pers<strong>on</strong>ality. Young peopleneed <str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> o<str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>r services to help <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>m navigatethis stretch of <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir life, <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> most importantly <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>y need<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>formati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> services to help protect <str<strong>on</strong>g>the</str<strong>on</strong>g>ir reproductivehealth. The chang<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g demographics of Ind<strong>on</strong>esia as itcompletes its demographic transiti<strong>on</strong> are plac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g grow<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gFigure3Challenges fac<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g Ind<strong>on</strong>esia’s FP programChang<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>gDemographicsChang<str<strong>on</strong>g>in</str<strong>on</strong>g>g<str<strong>on</strong>g>Internati<strong>on</strong>al</str<strong>on</strong>g>AgendaFP/RHPolicymakersDecentralizati<strong>on</strong>GoodGovernanceSource: Ind<strong>on</strong>esian Demographic <str<strong>on</strong>g>and</str<strong>on</strong>g> Health Surveys.229